Viral Videos

2216 Words5 Pages

Internet Celebrities

For those who feel a deeper love of sharing, Internet celebrity beckons. Pop artist Andy Warhol famously said that “in the future, everyone will be world-famous for fifteen minutes.” Warhol spoke this most famous quote in 1968, well before YouTube and Google were anything but science fiction, yet the phrase now seems prophetic. Celebrity, once the exclusive province of people who had an abundance of talent, connections and luck, has become a more attainable goal – at least if Internet celebrity counts.

When Internet fame brings real album sales and ad offers, as it did for the Chicago-based band OK Go, achieving viral video fame pays off. The band's first viral video offering, “Here It Goes Again,” featured an intricately choreographed dance on treadmills and a tune as infectious as the visually arresting video. The group reached 50 million viewers on YouTube with that video; that doesn't include e-mailed and saved versions of the song. If one percent of the people who watch later buy the song, something that's becoming increasingly easy to do via YouTube and other video sharing sites, that equals half a million sales.

While OK Go aimed for fame with their viral videos, other Internet celebrities became famous before they realized what was happening. Gary Brolsma filmed himself lip-synching to a Moldovan pop tune called “Dragostea din Tei” that featured the phrase “nu ma, nu ma iei.” Gary's exuberant chair-dance and facial expressions delighted hundreds of millions of viewers, but tagged him with the permanent nickname Numa Numa Guy. His first instinct was to flee the limelight, but he quickly changed his mind and embraced his Internet fame, parlaying it into ads and appearances in other music vide...

... middle of paper ...

...et them offer real-time critiques of the experience. Video itself can hardly get more compact and easy to use than camera phones without subcutaneous implantation.

Content changes are likely to happen before format changes. Video is ultimately a passive medium; viewers can leave comments or create parodies in response to a viral video, but they must still watch it to get the sense of it. Print has the benefit of letting readers take a more active role, receiving information at the rate they choose instead of at the speed chosen for them by a filmmaker. Print can go viral too, so campaigns that rely on both strong written content and intriguing video may enjoy wider appeal as passive viewers take a renewed interest in becoming active readers.

Once an Internet technology becomes mainstream, the roots of the next great idea to supplant it are already growing.

Open Document