Violence In The French Revolution Essay

534 Words2 Pages

Violence is an inherent part of human nature, the minute we picked up sticks and stones they were fashioned into weapons. In progressive society one could claim there is no need for violence, but in the case of the French Revolution, when voices were ignored and people were oppressed, violence was a necessary move for a greater future. Before the revolution, France was still governed by a dated monarchy, comprised of three rigid social classes called Estates. With ensuing poverty and political strife, the people required change. However it could be argued that it may well have been taken too far, especially when considering the extensive violence. To understand the Third’s adoption of violence as a form of political action, it is important to identify the standards of life which led them to such drastic measures. The most notable instigating occurrences for the people were the unstable political …show more content…

The violence of the Third Estate was, by far, the most graphic, poignant, and therefore condemned, of the revolution. It’s important to remember that the third estate contained roughly 98% of France’s population, and the majority of the third estate was made up of the rural peasantry, who were at the mercy of their wealthy landowners and nobles. Before the revolution began it was only the Third Estate who were taxed by the crown, yet they still held no political representation. This was one of the major motivating reasoning for the ‘Bourgeois Revolution’ against the monarchy. Jacques Necker was appointed finance minister by King Louis XVI, and won the people over with his tax reforms and transparency with the crowns finances. He prompted the king to take the nobles and clergy too, to help bring France out of their mounting debt. The king ordered a meeting of the Estates-General to decide on this issue, the first meeting in 175 years. Regardless

Open Document