Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chaucer’s insight into human behavior in The Canterbury Tales
The Canterbury tales analysis
Chaucer's life as reflected in the Canterbury tales
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In her article, " 'Quiting ' Eve: Violence against Women in the Canterbury Tales,"
Angela Jane Weisl notes that "The Canterbury Tales are framed by a story-telling
competition that becomes increasingly heated as tellers (particularly the male tellers)
attempt to 'quite ' one another 's stories" (117). In their efforts to quite each other, each of
the first three story tellers, the knight, the miller, and the reeve, objectify and use the
women in increasingly more personal and physical ways.
Nussbaum and Langton have identified features that are involved in the viewing
and/or treating of a person, usually a woman, as an object. In "The Reeve 's Tale," the
most violent of the first three stories in the Canterbury Tales, all
…show more content…
The first of Nussbaum 's features is instrumentality: "The objectifier treats the
object as a tool of his or her purposes" (Nussbaum 257).John and Aleyn are not only
angry at being duped and cheated out of their grain by the thieving miller, they also fear
that when they get back to their college "men wil us fooles calle" (Chaucer 4111). But the
miller is a dangerous man who owns many sharp and pointy weapons, so, to get even, the
scholars will not physically attack the miller but will use the miller 's daughter to exact
Mulvey 2
revenge: "If that I may, yon wenche wil I swyve," vows Aleyn (Chaucer 4178). To
figuratively screw the miller, Aleyn will literally screw the miller 's daughter
…show more content…
In other words, he
wanted as a wife a woman of a higher social class, a woman who would help him in his
business and improve his social standing in the community. He sees a superior wife as a
tool to help him rise in the world. This idea of the wife being merely a tool of the miller
is found in the description of an article of her clothing - "a gyte of reed" - a red gown, an
article that highlights her wealth, value, and social status. It 's also a symbol of the miller 's
jealousy, a red stop sign to any and all who might covet her.
However, nowhere are we given the wife 's name or do we learn anything else
about her. We do learn that she is haughty, but this might be evidence of the bias on the
part of the teller of this tale – the miller is a thieving bastard and his wife is a haughty
bitch and both are deserving of what happens to them in the end.
Mulvey 4
Two additional features of objectification identified by Langton - defining
someone primarily in terms of their looks and identifying them with their body or body
parts - can also be found in The Reeve 's Tale.The Reeve describes the Miller 's
The Reeve which is Osewold does take offense at the Miller’s tale of a stupid carpenter and counters his tale of a dishonest Miller. Osewold speaks in the Millers churl’s terms to basically lay it on the line for him on basically how he feels about the Miller’s tale, but in a weird, friendly way. Osewold speaks “I pray to God his neck may break into pieces, he can well in my eye see a piece of straw, but in his own he can not see a large piece of timber” In Lines (3918-20). Basically, the Miller and the Reeve don’t like each other at all due to them working with each other as carpenters in the same mill. Osewold is basically, trying to explain that the Miller is a thief and a dishonest miller and not fully honest with the company. Plus, the Miller is drunk so it’s still going to look bad on him because of him still being dishonest with his
Life as a human is dictated by an inborn hunger or purpose, and people, in general, will act on this hunger for their own personal gain in their individual ways. This hunger, be it for wealth, land, love, power, revenge, or pride, can, and will be the undoing or failing of all mankind as Miller so clearly points out in his play 'The Crucible';. This essay will explore the motives of characters within the play and even the motives of Arthur Miller himself and therefore show how conflict stems from certain recognisable human failings including those mentioned above, fear, and hysteria.
Chaucer's "The Miller's Tale" should be tragic, because a lot of horrible things happen to the characters. The carpenter's wife is disloyal to him, sleeping with others and making fun of him with Nicholas. Also, he is depicted as a fool. However, readers get a humorous feeling from the story, rather than feeling sorry for the carpenter's unfair life. Chaucer makes the whole story come across as comic rather than tragic. This humor is created by the Miller's narration, the use of irony, the cartoon-like characters, and the twists of plot. These elements combine to produce an emotional distance which enhances the comic effect.
Cornelius, Michael G. "Sex and Punishment in Geoffrey Chaucer's 'The Miller's Tale.'" Human Sexuality. New York: Bloom's Literary Criticism, 2009. 95-104. [ILL]
Chaucer, Geoffrey. "The Miller's Tale". Reading Chaucer. Trans. Larry D. Benson. Ed. Alfred David, James Simpson. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006.
The Virtue of Men and Women in The Canterbury Tales People never change. In every town you will always be able to find the "rich guy," the "smart guy," the "thief," and the "chief." It has been that way since the first man was swindled out of his lunch. Throughout his life, Geoffrey Chaucer encountered every kind of person and brought them to life for us in "The Canterbury Tales," a collection of short stories written in the 1300's. There are tales of saints, tales of promiscuity, tales of fraud, and tales of love.
Each pilgrim claims to have a tale good enough to match, or "quite," the previous tale told. The constant presence of competition in the tales—which often takes on an odd tone, as the combatants treat it more as a debate over whom the gods will or should choose to support and guide to victory— is echoed by the "route" of travellers telling them. And yet, as each character boasts of his or her tale, they constantly hedge their own bets, warning of the possibility that they might err in some way as they tell their story, and asking their company to absolve them of their flaws in advance. The most striking example of this is the Miller. The drunk, boorish Miller interrupts the pecking order, leaping over "better" men such as the Monk and the Man of Law in order to share a tale with which he plans to "quite the Knightes tale." When told by the Host to know his place, he threatens to leave the company unless he is permitted to tell his tale, and has to this point come across as brash and very confident in his abilities. However, when the Host relents and allows the Miller to have the floor, he backtracks: "But first I make a protestacioun, That I am dronke--- I knowe it by my soun." While the Pagans in the Knight 's tale blame failures on Fortune, the Miller, far more plain and earthly than the Knight or any of his characters, has a more practical scapegoat in mind: the
The Reeve’s Tale begins as The Reeve assures the Miller he will get him back for his tale. The Miller in the story lives close to a college. Each day, the Miller robs the mill of wheat and corn. One day when the supervisor of the college becomes ill, the Miller takes the opportunity to take more than he usually does. Two students at the college, John and Aleyn, are shocked and angry with the news and they volunteer to
The Miller was inflicted by pride and avariciousness. He was very prideful. He would boast about anything that he could do well. In “The Prologue”(pg. 107 lines 557-558), it says, “Broad, knotty and short-shouldered, he would boast, He could heave any door off hinge and post”. He was an avaricious man. He would steal grain for himself. In “The Prologue”, it says, “His was a master-hand at stealing grain. He felt it with his thumb and thus he knew its quality and took three times his due”. (Pg. 107 lines 570-572)
In the prologue, the Miller states, “And harlotry was all they had to tell. Consider then and hold me free of blame; and why be serious about a game?” (Chaucer 104). By this, the Miller retaliates from the Reeve’s earlier remark by exposing the plot of the previous tales. He ends with a question to imply that everyone’s stories are just a game to amuse the Host. The author uses the want Absalon has for Alison to show how foolish love can be. Chaucer does not exactly criticize love, but he exposes how love can turn into anger. On page 109, Absalon is shown singing to Alison under her bedroom window but she shoos him away. The parish clerk is persistent on winning Alison over, and Alison is persistent on getting rid of him. In the end though, love makes a fool of Absalon and he acts out of anger to get revenge. On page 115, Nic states, “ ‘Your wife and you must hang some way apart, For there must be no sin before we start.’” (Chaucer 115). Chaucer uses satirical irony through the actions of Nicolas to make fun of the carpenter’s blinding faith. Even though John is not committing sin by sleeping with Alison, Nic is by sleeping with a married woman. Nicolas makes fun of John’s wisdom again by saying, “‘You’re wise enough, I do not have to teach you, Go save our lives for us, as I beseech you.’” (Chaucer
In both the Miller’s Tale and the Wife of Bath’s Tale, Chaucer uses his characters and stories in order to project various stereotypes to the reader. Although varying a tad bit throughout the book, the tone that seems to be drawn from the stories is that women are manipulating, sinful, and power hungry, while men are considered gullible and rash. Its through understand and analyzing these stereotypes that we can fully understand what Chaucer’s stories are trying to convey to us.
In the Crucible, Miller uses jealously to help amplify the numerous conflicts that occur. Other key elements like manipulation also play into this story and almost all of the characters encounter either conflict or jealously and they all deal with it in different ways. Throughout the story, Jealously incorporates essentially leads to create these conflicts and result into larger situations.
“Miller tries both to offer a disclaimer about the imaginative aspects of his work, and to claim a higher level of veracity for the play’s authority.” (133)
One of the most prominent themes in Fragment VII of the Canterbury Tales is the attitudes of the pilgrims towards women. There are two distinct sides in the dispute: that women are simply objects of lust that must never be trusted, and that women are highly respectable and loving.
The debate of which individual should have the authority in a marriage, the man or the woman, is a topic that has remained unanswered for centuries. While he does not solve this debate, Geoffrey Chaucer attempts to unpack the different elements that factor into it. In Canterbury Tales, primarily in the prologue of the Wife of Bath and both tales of the Wife of Bath and the Clerk, Chaucer displays different types of marriages. These marriages analyze how a man or woman can gain authority over the other. These marriages vary in terms of their dynamics due to the unique individuals and their environments. Through an analysis of the marriages depicted by Chaucer in the prologue and tales of the Clerk and the Wife of Bath, one can see the different