Luzzatto Essay Moshe Chaim Luzzatto, a Jewish rabbi, wrote extensively about many topics. Luzzatto’s writings can be applied to us today and from which we can learn a great deal. Two of the topics that we discussed in seminar that Luzzatto addresses were vigilance and alacrity. Vigilance is the process of regarding someone's actions and affairs and about knowing if your actions are right or wrong. In order to be vigilant, two parts are necessary. The first part involves determining what is considered evil and what is good. By doing this, you can make the right decision and do the right thing. The second part is to “see if his own deeds are good or evil,” which means that you have to decide if your actions were good or evil. This applies at …show more content…
He stated that alacrity involves to “turn from evil and do good.” Alacrity, like vigilance, also consists of two elements. The first one is to not delay starting the deed and the second one is that once you have started the deed you must hurry to finish the act. The basic concept of alacrity is to act swiftly when completing a mitzvah. This is stated when he uses metaphorical language to illustrate that “passivity in deeds is as harmful as actively causing damage.” Acting slowly when committing a mitzvah is passively causing harm to yourself and it is just as bad as active harm. You must act quickly to perform the mitzvah and not procrastinate because the longer you procrastinate, the chance of the opportunity ending increases. This is the case for many mitzvahs. A great example of this is doing the dishes; once you start doing the dishes you should hurry up and finish before more pots and pans get put in the sink or before someone else does the dishes instead of you. In order to acquire alacrity and vigilance you must do very similar things. The only major difference is that alacrity is regarding the positive commandments while vigilance is referencing the negative ones. In the process of acquiring alacrity, once someone realizes the full values of the mitzvos they will be drawn to fulfill the mitzvos. It is also possible to lose alacrity and this can happen through a lack of …show more content…
This metaphor takes place in a maze and the objective is to reach the gazebo in the middle. Once you reach the gazebo, you can see everyone in the maze and choose to help them out. When you are in the maze, you cannot see your path and some paths lead away from the gazebo. If someone offers you advice on how to reach the center you can either choose to put your trust in them or try and figure out your own path. The only way to reach the center is by putting your faith in the people who have reached the gazebo. You have to make a decision to place your trust in someone else. Something else that can be learned from this metaphor is to foresee the consequences. To do this, you have to have knowledge of what will happen as a result of your actions. The corresponding idea is to learn from your mistakes. You cannot learn from your mistakes if you already know it will be a mistake. In this case, you do something wrong, but then gain knowledge about how to do it
Tests and decisions are as numerous in any man's life as are the beats of his heart. The consequences follow him forever - he is judged by them and they affect his entire existence. However, judgement should not be passed on a man's single decisions individually, but only by observing how he has chosen to live his life.
However, three ethical decisions that this learning will make after viewing the film is to always assist individual to the best of your ability, despite personal issues with loved ones or friends; next, always report crimes, no matter the consequence they may have; and last but not least, stand up for what’s right, even if it leads to misfortune. The pros of each of these decisions is peace within yourself. However, one of the cons is dealing with negative pressures. For example, when you report a crime, you may be summoned to court, and have to deal with the negative criticism.
thus know what is best not to do to someone else. (i.e. don’t need to
In “Can We Teach Character? An Aristotelian Answer” by Edwin M. Hartman, Hartman discussed about how one can improve another’s ethics by teaching them about good characters. (Hartman 68) and by teaching them “techniques for deciding what the right thing is” (Hartman 69). As Hartman mentioned, “ a person of good character in Aristotle's sense knows genuine strength and cowardice when s/he sees it.” (Hartman 75) meaning that a good character should be able to tell and recognize the difference between what’s good and what's bad. I agree with Hartman I believe that being able to identify what is right or wrong is very important. I grew up learning to do only the right things and not the wrong. However, if I cannot identify which
prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance are vital facets in the decision-making process. Prudence affects moral judgment, sensitivity, and intention. It is concerned with the knowledge and practical wisdom. Justice, on the other hand, refers to the permanent attitude to perform what is fair. Another virtue; temperance refers to the desire to pursue what is just while avoiding dangerous undertakings. The fortitude virtue then controls the passions of humans like despair, fear, anger, audacity, and hope. All these elements affect both individual and organizational factors of ethical decision-making (Cabello-Medina,
When people realize that good and evil are just points of view that are placed on other people and actions, it is possible to transcend these superficial roles. Since it is people who create the meaning of evil, it cannot be said that people are evil, or are born evil, because not only is that a perspective that is assumed onto others, which will change with different cultures, societies, and eras, but the very same acts may appear to be both good and evil, depending on the perspective in which the acts are seen. Ultimately, it is the individual’s responsibility to decide for himself the effects of his actions on himself and others.
In Luzzatto’s, “The Path of The Just,” he spends 9 chapters discussing the value of vigilance and alacrity. His argument can be taken and molded to relate to modern life situations that many people would not think about in their daily routines. As our class discussed Luzzatto’s points made in his argument, we applied his beliefs to our own modern lives and each took away something unique to our own personal beliefs. Vigilance and Alacrity are different concepts that have a connection to each other and if they stand alone, their meanings are not as valuable.
Albert is trying to say that if you do something wrong in life you can always
This research paper with discuss how an inherently “good” person can under the right circumstances turn “evil” and the psychological effects behind the change. To understand how a person can cross the proverbial line from good to evil; evil itself must be given a definition. The word evil has been an overarching term to describe anything from biblical aspects to natural disasters, even to describe the human condition. For this paper the human aspect of evil will be solely focused on. Oxford dictionary describes evil as “profoundly immoral and malevolent.” To understand this further the philosopher Peter Dews Author of “The idea of Evil” writes “Basic notions of offence and punishment, of transgression and forgiveness, seem to lose their grip in the face of profound, far reaching desecrations of the human. For those kinds of crimes, “evil” is still the only word we’ve got.” (12) Through this research paper Ethics of these experiments will not be discussed. Each of these experiments in present day are considered unethical however, they served their purpose in finding what psychological aspects contribute to evil in a given individual.
The average man or woman would be interested in this essay because it unveils a reality which all of us face at one point or another, common mental errors. As previously mentioned Wise mentions several key terms for the reader to use and understand. . The author uses five key points, The Domino Effect, Double or Nothing, Situational Blindness, Bending the Map and Redlining. The Domino Effect according to Wise, is when people look not to their logic but to their emotion and fall victim to the same fate as those their trying to save. You often see this situation in people trying to save someone who is drowning or trapped in a house fire. Double or nothing according to Wise, is where people fail to calculate true risk. Wise says this is seen most often at Casinos and in investing. We’ve all seen the guy or woman who is at the black...
“In the long run, we shape our lives, and we shape ourselves. The process never ends until we die. And the choices we make are ultimately our own responsibility.” (Eleanor Roosevelt). This is just one of the infinite examples of how human nature has been explored by so many different people. Each and every human is born with the capability of making their own choices. The decisions that they will make in the future will determine how evil they are viewed by others. Although one’s nature and nurture do affect their life, it is their own free will that determines whether or not they are evil.
the way in which we come to find out what actions are right and which
One of the desirability of virtue ethics is the elasticity to measure each situation independently, searching for action guidance in bearing in mind what a naturally virtuous person would do. This would be clarified and informed by the pertinent facts and personal ethical sensitivities of that situation. This permits and heartens creative resolutions to very difficult problems, which may be harder to disc...
“4. RESOLUTION Resolve to perform what you ought; perform without fall what you resolve.”(132) The first four of these virtues seem hard enough that it would take most of a person’s strength just to follow them. Yet these four not only show the need for discipline but the importance of restraint.
In our world today, we come across all sorts of people. Some you see do evil actions and some you see do good actions. The person doing a good action might be a psychotic killer-- you never know. The other person doing the evil action, could be a priest. Not everything you see people do shows what type of person they really are inside. These people may look one way on the outside, but the world can change the way they see the world and their ultimate actions. Regardless of how someone seems, they are consistently changing because of the evil energies of the world. Humans are all born good and pure, although as we grow up we are corrupted by the evil world around us.