Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of protest movement on vietnam war
Antiwar influences of the Vietnam War
Anti - war movement during the Vietnam war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of protest movement on vietnam war
With the failure of policy makers to fully commit to the war early on it made it impossible to win the conflict. The presidents in the early days of the war had enough support for this invasion but that quickly dwindled away as they did not take the war seriously leading to a communist victory. The United States lack of military strategy contributed to the fact that they were being beaten by the Viet Cong. The strategy of the U.S was flawed from the very beginning with their poor combat missions. Military forces in Vietnam used a Search and Destroy policy, where they inserted ground forces into hostile territory, searched out the enemy, destroyed them, and withdrew immediately afterward ( Stanton 8). This strategy was unsuccessful because …show more content…
The U.S strategy against the Guerilla warfare of the Viet Cong consisted of using Agent orange, a deadly chemical that kills the plant life, to\kill the crops around them and flush the enemy out (Leepson 300). This strategy was flawed in two ways. It first failed to work quickly or efficiently enough because of an unwillingness of the enemy to come out. Secondly, the U.S was fighting the enemy on their terms in their territory. This gave the Gurillias a huge advantage by being able to hide in the Jungle and set ambushes and traps for the approaching enemy in the jungle. Additionally, this strategy took to up too much time in the U.S’s limited timeframe. Early in the conflict,” The lack of quick serous movement by the U.S military is what allowed the war to go on for so long” ( Appleman 249). However, this lack of movement by the military is due to the failure of presidents to act quickly. The lack of quick …show more content…
This attack was rather unsuccessful in terms of an attack. The North Vietnamese and Vietcong had 50,000 casualties including captured soldiers where as the U.S lost only 3,000 troops. However, the U.S and south Vietnamese suffered a much larger Psychological loss in the Tet Offensive (Appleman 269). Before this attack the South Vietnamese citizens had not been directly targeted on such a scale by the communists. This helped to demoralize the South Vietnamese people and the U.S troops protecting them who thought they were safe from conflict by opening them up to further attack. Correspondingly, the Tet offensive had a huge affect on the people of the U.S. This battle fueled the Antiwar movement of America. It did this by,” reinforcing the views of those who were already disillusioned with the war,”(Nev 134). The reason it boosted the Antiwar movement is because it cast doubt on the United States ability to win the war. With a new found doubt in winning the war it created an even greater lack of resolve and support for the for fighting a war in Asia. The ability of the Communist to demoralize and create larger opposition for the war is why it is the most important battle of the
Robert S. McNamara's book, In Retrospect, tells the story of one man's journey throughout the trials and tribulations of what seems to be the United States utmost fatality; the Vietnam War. McNamara's personal encounters gives an inside perspective never before heard of, and exposes the truth behind the administration.
The Vietnam War took place in between 1947- 1975. It consisted of North Vietnam trying to make South Vietnam a communism government. The United States later joined this conflict because of the stress North Vietnam was putting to South Vietnam to become a government that America did not want. The main reason why America joined was because of a theory called the Domino Effect. America and Russia were going through what has been dubbed the Cold War. The Domino Effect is the theory that communism will spread form one country to another. United states does not want this because our government is a democracy and communism opposes everything we stand for. America fearing communism was growing, stepped into Vietnam with America’s interest in mind, instead of Vietnam’s. There are several reason why American should have not gotten involved with this war. The most important reason was that America government officials made to much of a big deal about communism. This might sound cynical, but America to a certain degree did over react. Let it be said that it is much easier to say this after the fact. By looking back at McCarthyism, we can see the silliness of this fear. There is a serious side though. Thousands of people dies for a government that has no impact of their daily life. What regime Vietnam was going to change over to had no effect on the every day cycle of the United States. So truly, one can say, this can not one thing to do with America, its government and people.
What Different Tactics Did Both Sides use in an Attempt to Win the Conflict in Vietnam Between 1956 and1968? Both sides used different tactics and had to adapt strategies in response to the conditions they had to meet. Vietnam has some of the harshest conditions possible in which to fight. From the swamps, paddy fields and the Mekong delta in the south, to the mountainous jungles in the north; it was all alien to the Americans. The geography in Vietnam was so different to what the American soldiers had been trained in, that they found it difficult to exploit the landscape and make good use of it.
He was also a Gulf War veteran who commanded an armored cavalry. His desire in writing this book was to examine, through the recently declassified documents, manuscript collections, and the Joint Chief of Staff official histories, where the responsibility for the Vietnam foreign policy disaster lay, but also examine the decisions made that involved the United States in a war they could not win. This book details the discussion of government policy in the stages of the Vietnam crisis from 1961-July 1965. It examines the main characters of President Lyndon B. Johnson, Robert McNamara, in addition to the military, which included the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It began in the Kennedy era amidst the Bay of Pigs incident and how that led to mistrust of the military planning by advisors and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Recent technological advancements on show in the recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq have indicated, to some, that there is a new American way of war. Scholars, however, do not seem to have reached consensus on what a new way of war for the United States would embody. Depending on the scholar, their beliefs are underwritten by the American ability to wage war with highly interconnected, agile, precise, and extremely damaging methods or because the United States is capable of waging war with a small, Special Forces centered footprint. Other scholars argue that there is not a new American way of war because traditional methods are still necessary in many kinds of conflict. Scholars who address this question focus on conflicts that they believe to be important indicators of how the United States will act in the future, but miss the forest for the trees. The choice of a particular method of combat in any given war is not the result of some national tendency, but rather the result of the political object desired. The political object is the ultimate arbiter of the choice of strategy in war, and that is certainly not new to how the United States wages war.
The Viet Cong (VC) has far better tactics than the US. The VC was told to 'nibble at the enemy' so that he could 'neither eat or sleep'. This worked very well for me. Another demoralizing tactic the VC used was their landmines; they were designed to blow the limbs off the soldiers without killing them. This tied up hospital beds and meant the soldiers had to carry the wounded back to the base.
After Vietnam erupted into civil war, both sides started employing clever tactics and new t...
The US Government had no clear political objective that could end the war. In fact, in 1954 President Eisenhower decided that going to this war was not worth the sacrifices that had to be made, but the US bureaucracy at that time failed to adopt a coherent policy . Thus, the US slipped toward war with half measures. Additionally, US commanders and soldiers were geared and trained for large scale combat and, as a result, found it difficult to adapt to the unique requirements of counterinsurgency . US military failed to consider the ideological motive and commitment of the Viet-Cong.
On January 31, 1968 The Tet offensive was a surprise attack in hopes for the American soldiers to back out and stop their support of South Vietnam. The North Vietnam along with Viet Cong main goal was to turn Vietnam fully communist, but in order to succeed they had to defeat South Vietnam and try to intimidate the American leaders out of Vietnam. They believed that the Tet offensive would cause the Army of the Republic of Vietnam forces to collapse which would weaken the Saigon defensive positions and disrupt South Vietnam and the U.S plans in attacking North Vietnam. The Tet offensive approximately sent 80,000 National Liberation Front soldiers to Central South Vietnam, these soldiers started to attack at 13 cities and lead to 100 cities, towns, military bases and many other places. Four thousand National Liberation Front soldiers were sent to Saigon in which this actually weaken Saigon control. Tet offensive was a surprise but the U.S. soldiers managed to fight back in which caused numerous of Viet Cong losses. As a result the National Liberation Front suffered as many as 40,000 casualties. During the attack Charlie Company had several of its soldiers killed in the area during the preceding weeks and were down to just about 100 men. The Tet offensive heated things up between the Charlie Company and Viet Cong soldiers (Abdul
...nt pressure from its own citizens, the United States refused to change its tactics and the argument over this issue would not end with the war.
The Vietnam War was a long, costly armed conflict. The conflict put the communist government of North Vietnam and Viet Cong, against South Vietnam and the United States. More than 3 million people were killed in the Vietnam War. The people among the dead were as many as 58,000 Americans. That statistic places the death toll for Vietnamese civilians over more than half.
The Vietnam War was unsuccessful for the Americans because of the loss of support back at the United States. It was between South Vietnam and their American allies against North Vietnam and Viet Cong. The battle occurred between 1954 to 1975. Over three million people were killed during this war in which 58,000 of them were American. The United States were trying to help South Vietnam fight communism from taking over.
In Vietnam, no longer did the U.S military face an equally matched opponent on an open battlefield. It now faced an enemy heavily concealed among the local civilian populace that was often unconcerned with following the international rules of warfare. In Vietnam. The Viet Cong’s hit and run and ambush tactics were specifically designed to drain the moral of American troops. They made U.S troops unwilling to fight and reduced the overall effectiveness of U.S forces.
Historically, the United States has most often engaged in irregular wars since its conception. Robert Scaife’s article in the Small Wars Journal discusses the few instances the US military has faced regular wars when stating that, “During the 20th Century, the United States arguably engaged...
Kennedy and Diem were both killed in 1963 and 1964. Johnson took control of the situation by increasing the amount of money and manpower put into Vietnam. Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, giving the president full military power. After Johnson dramatically escalated the amount of soldiers in Vietnam, The North Vietnamese mounted a surprise attack during the Vietnamese new year, and this strike was called the Tet Offensive. It made America more aware of what they were up against, that the communists were capable of fierce, guerrilla warfare, unlike anything Americans had ever fought before. Images of the terror and disarray reached back home, and the U.S. began to wonder how effective their involvement in Vietnam really was.