The vehicle code of the state of California has many rules and laws that are directly related to vehicle operating, owning a vehicle, registering a vehicle, and insuring a vehicle. Department of Motor Vehicle and Highway Patrol in California perform their duties and apply these rules and laws by proceeding the vehicle code of the state of California.
The key elements of the policy:
1. All vehicles in California must be registered. Vehicle registration must be renewed annually. According to Article 1, no one can drive a car that is not registered (Official California Legislative Information, Article 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3).
2. There are parking information and rules that all vehicles must obey.
3. All motor vehicles must be appropriate
…show more content…
The rules, regulations and laws changed and updated after years, such as “1923”, “1935”, “1959” and 1999 (California Department of Motor Vehicles). For example, “in 1923”, “California Highway Patrol” emerged, “in 1935, the California Vehicle Act” was begun to be “known as the California Vehicle Code”, “in 1959, the California Vehicle Code was re-codified”, and seat belt regulation came in 1999 (California Department of Motor Vehicles). The laws and the regulations were updated for the benefits of people for safety issues. Changing or updating the California vehicle code is an example of policy making that it is seen that the issues were defined, had “agenda setting”, formulated, adopted, evaluated, and accepted (Kraft and Furlong, 2015). The California Vehicle Code was created with the “Institutional Theory” that gets the benefits of “structure, roles, powers and rules of government in determining policy” (Kraft and Furlong, 2015). It is because the other states vehicle codes influenced on the California’s, too. In conclusion, the California Vehicle Code was created in 1914, and then it was upgraded, updated, changed and it adopted some regulations and laws from other states like seat belt safety issue. It was done by the institutional theory because other state governments, local government and maybe foreign states’ regulations influenced on the California Vehicle Code on behalf of California
An enormous division currently exists between the people who believe that automobile safety should be an option and those that feel it must be a requirement. The federal government feels the morally obligated to create the safest driving environment possible. On the other end of the spectrum, opinions exist that the average driver has ability to make the choice of safety on their own. Editorials, political assemblies, debates, and conversations have arrived on the concept of click it or ticket. This idea refers to ticketing any motor vehicle driver and passenger that is not fastened by a seat belt. Arguments have been made for both sides, and have been reviewed in multiple states.
There are many positive aspects to having a HSR in California. First, after the HSR is completed most people will choose to ride the HSR than flying or driving. The HSR will be efficient, convenient, reliable, and environmentally healthy for citizens of California. HSR will minimize carbon dioxide from vehicles and greyhound’s buses (Pettinger, 2013). HSR will benefit both businesses and vacation travelers because it will allow them easy and quick access to a range of California cultural and tourist attractions, sporting events, and recreational destinations. The continuous job growth from expanded operations and
States and much of the world. Owning a vehicle is almost a necessity in modern society.
In the late 1920’s, school buses and larger industrial vehicles became a popular source of transportation that started from Ford dealership owner, A.L. Luce. Luce had plans to extend the school bus frame (from a Model T) to accompany more students per one bus. As school buses and city buses became more common throughout America’s cities for daily transportation, safety regulations and precautions were put in place. Safety features, including flashing caution lights, visors outside of the vehicle, and motorized stop signs and stop arms were all installed within the next 80 years to make the journey to and from school safer. Although many of these precautions were taken, many citizens believe that not enough action was taken to promote safety on school buses. Because a variety of school bus companies do not have a stance on whether seatbelts should be installed or not, the safety concerns mainly impact parents and school leaders. A good solution for many of those concerned would be the installation of seatbelts on every school bus within the United States, but the reality of seatbelts being on buses is quite the opposite of what people believe. Seatbelts are not the justification to these safety issues concerning school corporations and parents nationwide, as the seatbelts are a costly and dangerous factor.
In 1966, the National Highway Safety Bureau (NHSB) was designed by the Highway Act. NHSB’s director, Dr. William Haddon, noticed that he could prevent motor-vehicle injuries by applying public health methods and epidemiology. Various passages demanded the government to set standards for the highway and motor vehicles. The federal government responded by developing new safety features in cars such as safety belts, head rests, and shatter-resistant windshields. Barriers, reflectors, and center line strips were placed on roadways to provide direction and illumination. Traffic safety laws, wearing a safety belt, and public education encouraged drivers to make safer decisions. The use of safety belts has skyrocketed from 11% in 1981 to 68% in 1997 and decreases When the community and government understood the necessity for motor-vehicle safety, various programs such as Prior to the implementation, the rate stood at 18 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 1925; however, the rate stood at 1.7 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 1997. With all of the new safety features with cars, public education and enforcement of safety laws, “motor-vehicle crashes remain the leading cause of injury-related deaths in the United States.” Over 23.9 million vehicle crashes were reported in 1997; estimated costs were around $200 billion.
California is a different kind of state. It is one of the largest states and is known for being one of the most diverse states along with being one of the most populous states in America as well. With all these factors coming into play with California, it is not unlikely that California’s politics is in for a wild journey.
These proposed laws will make driving any type of automobile a lot safer, which should be the ultimate goal of any driver getting behind the wheel. Laws being changed or added will obviously save a vast amount of time, money, and lives, however, as long as there are vehicles on the road, there is a chance of accidents occurring. Victims of car accidents are often extremely disoriented so it is important to be aware of what laws are in place to protect victims and know the proper steps to take in the event of a traffic
Roan, Shari. "Driving Laws May Be Shifting the Fatalities to Older Teens." Los Angeles Times. 14 Sep 2011: A.1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 06 Feb 2012.
California, a state located on the West Coast of the United States is the most popular state. Its the third largest state by area. California borders Oregon to the North, Nevada to the East, Arizona to the Southeast, and the Mexican States of Baja to the South. On 1850, September 9 California became the 31st state of the United States. California became the 31st state in the Union even though it hasn’t even been part of the United States for less than 2 years.
The state of California recently enacted two new driving laws. These new laws included having to use a hand-free device. Another thing these laws touch on is texting while driving.
With the introduction of the automobile in the early 1900s, laws have been instituted to protect drivers on the road. With these laws come lawbreakers who put their agenda in front of the well being of others. Tens of thousands of lives have been lost. billions of dollars have been spent, and pollution has grown exponentially because of this. drivers travelling at high speeds on roads (Hartman).
There is a need for the introduction and implementation of new drunk driving laws by the legislature, because presently the united States drunk driving laws are too lenient. The continuous rate of drunken driving fatalities makes a case that the united States drunk driving laws are too lenient and makes a call for stricter laws. According to Valenti “countries with strict drunk driving penalties have a far lower incidence of accidents than the United States (1). The United States being a first world country is weak in enforcing strict punishment for drunk drivers. Valenti is emphasizing on the fact that the united States need to improve their present laws and be firm in enforcing these new laws. There is a need for the United States to improve on their severity of its drunk driving penalties just the way the other part of the world have done and this is giving them a reduced rate of drunk driving fatalities. The claim of the leniency of the United States drunk driving laws is further stated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), this is a prominent body when it comes to the issue of drunken driving fatalities. It claims that the drunken driving laws are severe enough. “Despite great strides in awareness, education and enforcement in the last two decades the United States still has one of the most lenient drunken driving standards in the world”. (NHTSA of existing laws. There is a need for stricter laws to be introduced as the United States ranks behind the world when it comes to effort to combat drunk driving and more efforts need to be put in place by the implementation of harsher laws so as to reduce the high rate of repeat offenders and first time offenders.
Automobiles! You just have to have one in this fast paced world! In the United States automobiles are necessary. People need to move from point A to point B. These points can be as close as a few hundred feet or even range up to a few hundred miles! When making these trips safety is a priority. There are hundreds of thousands of automobiles on the roads across the nation and if safety was not considered, thousand would be injured or even killed daily! Automobile safety has come a long way over the years and as every day goes by more and more new ways are created to keep drivers, and their passengers, safe on the road.
The Supreme Court did not stop there, they continued to add more laws. “.new motor vehicles produced after September 1982 will be equipped with passive restraints to protect the safety of the occupants of the vehicle in the event of a collision” (Supreme Court). Now all new motor vehicles must have a form of passive restraint added to their vehicles before they can sell them to the public. The government hoped to protect more lives of young drivers who did not insist on wearing seat belts by making them mandatory and enforced by police officers. Since 1972, hundreds of thousands of teenage lives have been saved with this simple safety feature.
Rules are the foundation of society. If there are no rules everyone would do whatever they want and have serious consequences. For example, texting and and using your cell phone while driving is very dangerous to yourself and other people surrounding you. The reason why many people are against this action is because it causes many car accidents and deaths every year. While driving many teenagers and adu...