Utilitarianism In Lord Of The Flies

1312 Words3 Pages

A government is like the roots that gives life and holds the tree, and the laws are the branches which branch off the tree like of how they are composed from a government. A stable foundation is needed for the rest to stay in peace, but when the foundation breaks apart, so does the rest of the tree, or society. Cesare Beccaria and John Locke were two philosophers whose views were prerequisites to a stable society. Beccaria supported having a criminal justice system that incorporated utilitarianism, which means doing the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Locke believed that citizens deserved the naturals rights of life, liberty and property. These rights are crucial for citizens to live a content and stable life in society, because …show more content…

John Locke was the foremost expert of the incorporation of rights. He urged for a government which protected the natural rights given to a human: life, liberty, and property. He knew it was strongly necessary that all humans deserved the rights as they are the uppermost decisionmakers to their life. (Gonzalez Binder) Although, the boys on the island violated Locke’s views as they had no system in protecting these valuable rights. Ralph and Jack’s mentality was set upon leading the group, that they took no one's ideas and voices into consideration. This violated the boy's right to liberty as they were not in the decision making process to make decisions for the group's survival. Jack and Ralph’s decisions severely impacted the group in a negative way because of the horrible communication and trust they had between them. Jack’s ego was hurt when Ralph did not respect his decision of hunting and he separated from the group, “I’m going off by myself... Anyone who wants to hunt can come to.” (Golding 127). Understanding was the biggest issue Jack and Ralph faced as both of them wanted to be leaders, and no one was willing to compromise power. Jack had a desire to hunt for the group, although Ralph did not respect his decision to do so which violated

Open Document