Uris Hall Dairy Kitchen Case Study

1659 Words4 Pages

Case 2: Uris Hall Dormitory Kitchen The early days of Uris Hall’s dormitory kitchen were characterized by excellent food and a content, tight-knit staff. The employees’ feelings of satisfaction and utmost commitment to their jobs are best explained using Herzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene Model. This motivation theory relies on the assumption that satisfaction and dissatisfaction in the workplace are independent of each other, and a different set of factors is responsible for causing each emotion. One motivating factor is the employees’ sense of achievement in their work. The case stresses that the eleven women who worked in the kitchen felt a consistent sense of pride in their labor; they went to great lengths to ensure superior quality …show more content…

Loud.” The staff was not comfortable with her habit of singing at the top of her lungs, bossing other, more experienced women around, and extolling to the crew how great her abilities were in the kitchen. The old crew clearly had certain norms that each member followed, and disruptive behavior was not one of them. In short, these factors adversely affected kitchen staff morale and performance. The staff harbored great resentments toward the management, fellow personnel, and the new allocation of tasks. The kitchen employees obviously were struggling to cope with the new kitchen. We will be analyzing their team behaviors and outputs with six criteria: cohesiveness, goals, norms, external environment, member composition/roles, and leadership. There are two sides to every coin, the factors could enhance team outputs if used right, they could also hurt the team when ignored. Cohesiveness was the factor that helped them the most. The 11 old employees were kept as the morning shift instead of two shifts, this allowed them to face the new environment and harder task together with cohesiveness they built in last 16 …show more content…

Loud to the morning crew poses a second problem. Her poor influence on the staff has led to two workers threatening to quit. Considering the successful years of experience this group of women has achieved working in the dormitory, the Mrs. Loud situation must be addressed immediately. She should be removed from the morning crew, and either moved to the evening crew or fired altogether. Since she has little experience working in large kitchens and is likely to annoy the evening crew, it would probably be a better decision to fire her, and replace her with a new, more composed worker with greater

Open Document