Up: Movie Analysis

1054 Words3 Pages

The creation of life is a marvelous thing. The bodies and minds of individuals are boldly shaped through experiences and memories unique to each person. As babies grow to be teenagers and as teenagers grow to be older adults, each stage has its own particular courses that it travels. In order to see this more clearly, Pete Docter and Bob Peterson translate the stages of life through a young boy who becomes stuck with an elderly man on a mission to fulfill a lifelong promise to his deceased wife in the movie Up. At the very beginning of the movie, a young boy named Carl Fredricksen is at a theater screening of his childhood hero Charles Muntz. Charles Muntz is an adventurer who travels the world finding adventure everywhere he goes while discovering …show more content…

Russell finds his way to a now older Carl in an attempt to finalize his goal by assisting the elderly. As the two embark on their journey through Paradise Falls, Russell begins to realize, something most kids come to realize, that the books and stories he had heard about the wilderness were not true. As Russell says, “Wilderness isn’t what I expected. It sounds so different in my book”, it shows the error children have in interpreting the real world. Russell has a mislead perception of reality that was caused by books, movies, and other popular sources. Many kids are faced with the same issues, but they do not experience them until they are in the situation itself. A great example comes when Russell tries to put together a tent, but he fails miserably realizing that the reality is harder than what the world lead him to believe. As the story unravels, two parts of Erikson’s psychosocial stages of development are quite evident. The last two stages of development are the generativity versus stagnation and integrity versus despair (p. 16). The movie revolves around these two stages as Carl begins to explore what these final stages truly mean to

Open Document