Unrestricted NP Practice: A Literature Review

1158 Words3 Pages

Primary care services are an important focus of improving health outcomes in this country. These essential preventive services save lives and improve the quality of life by detecting health problems early. Visits to a primary care provider can help promote health by allowing patients qualified guidance in their decision making, encouraging family involvement, and putting patients in touch with community resources. Since the inception of the first Nurse Practitioner (NP) programs in the 1970’s, these providers have been providing primary care services to patients across the lifespan, typically with an emphasis on underserved populations. Just as long, there has been considerable resistance to NPs being allowed to practice by physician groups …show more content…

Despite this evidence, NPs still face considerable barriers to practice in most states; however, several states currently provide unrestricted independent practice rights to NPs. The purpose of this paper is to examine the available literature about what effect unrestricted NP practice has on accessibility to primary care and health outcomes in the states where independent practice is permitted. Literature Review Kuo, Lorest, Rounds, and James (2013) examined the relationship of the percentage of medicare patients seeing NPs for primary care and the level of restriction placed on NP practice in the state. The authors hypothesized that in states in which there were both fewer primary care physicians per capita and less restrictive NP laws, a higher amount of medicare patients would report NPs as …show more content…

Through a non-experimental design, the authors analyzed data to determine whether full, reduced, or restricted practice rights for NPs affected the health outcomes of medicare and medicaid patients in those states. The type of NP practice allowed was compared to state rankings for avoidable hospitalizations, readmission rates after inpatient rehabilitation, and hospitalizations of residents of long term care facilities, as well as state health outcome rankings provided by the United Health Foundation. The authors performed a quantitative statistical analysis of previous studies done pertaining to outcomes of medicare and medicaid patients. To be included in the analysis, previous studies had to have a national scope but also provide a state ranking system and an explanation of how the ranking was performed. The authors performed two-sampled t tests on all data to determine if there was a correlation between autonomous NP practice and patient outcomes. The results of comparing potentially avoidable hospitalizations, readmission rates of rehabilitation patients, annual hospitalizations of long term care patients and overall state health outcomes between states with full practice and those without, showed that full practice produces more desirable outcomes. Potentially avoidable hospitalizations per 1,000 person-years in

More about Unrestricted NP Practice: A Literature Review

Open Document