Office of Justice Programs The Office of Justice Programs is a division of the United States Department of Justice and established by the Justice Assistance Act of 1984. The mission of this agency is to expand public safety and improve the administration of fair justice throughout the country by providing adequate leadership and new programs. They strive to be the main source of support for the justice community by presenting and organizing data, research and development, training and statistics to ensure that communities are meeting their public safety goals. The agency provides federal leadership by developing programs and services to prevent and control crime. They work to administer fair justice and provide assistance to crime victims. …show more content…
The OJP provide grants and funds to not just implement new programs but also sponsors research in crime, criminal justice and evaluation of justice programs. They collect, assess, release and spread statistical information on crime, criminal offenders, victims of crime, and the operations of the justice system. The OJP also works to enhance the standards, integrity and convenience of the nationals criminal history records system. In addition they provide support for new developments, testing, assessments and utilization for new and cutting edge technologies and methods. Such new technologies and methods will provide better support and enhancement of law enforcement, courts and corrections. Another function of the OJP is to improve the ways to better assist victims of crime and provide guidance in refining the attitudes, policies and practices that promotes justice and healing for all crime …show more content…
However they work together with the DOJ and other agencies to better improve the functions of U.S. justice system. But not all programs they create, implement, fund or support are always successful. The OJP and like any other government agencies has flaws that can be problematic and create tension between the agency and public. The OJP has in the past been criticized with mishandling grants and its lack of proper management over the distribution of the grants. Just in the last year, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention has been investigated after whistleblowers complained that they have been breaking a federal law that protects youths accused of juvenile offense. The investigation led by U.S. Senator Charles E. Grassley accused the OJJDP of providing grants to states that were incarcerating youths with adult prisoners which is a violation of the 1974 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
In addition to Federal, State and local law enforcement participation in CJ Net, additional participants in the network may include;
The mission and values of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is up held with strong Constitutional values. Over the years since the FBI was created in 1908 by Attorney General Charles Bonaparte during the Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. As a progressive during this time period Bonaparte applied his philosophy to forming the FBI with several corps of agents. His thought was that these men should have expertise and not political connections. With the U.S. Constitution based on “federalism” a national government with jurisdiction over matters that cross boundaries, such as interstate and foreign affairs.
Juvenile Justice Reforms in the United States. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2011, from Juvenile Transfer to Criminal Courts: http://www.ojjdp.gov
To remedy this division the DRC changed its structure to a regionalized organization type. The supporting goal for this transition is to blur the lines within the functional structure and decentralize functions throughout the agency. Decentralizing will empower organization leaders, increase lines of communication at all levels, and build bridges within and between prison and parole services. The decentralized structure will make staff more available in the field to see, hear and feel what is taking place within their regions, allowing them to create relationships with community partners and offenders. All of these changes are to support and further the DRC’s mission of “reducing recidivism among those we touch” (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction). Common among most state ran prison systems within the United States; the Ohio DRC maintains several functions. Author Dean John Champion has identified these functions in his book, Administration of Criminal Justice: Structure, Funct...
...ing beckoned in with the 21st century. While U.S.’s JLWOP laws are inconsistent with many human rights treatises and with international law, it is more important for our policies to be based on a thorough understanding of the issue- the most essential being a separation of the processes for juvenile and adult criminal offenders. With an emphasis on rehabilitation for juvenile offenders, and the goal of encouraging maturity and personal development after wayward actions, the futures of many teens in the criminal justice system can become much more hopeful.
Zhang, Sheldon. "Preventing Parolee Crime Program." Program: Preventing Parolee Crime Program (PPCP). National Institute of Justice, 15 June 2007. Web. 26 Nov. 2013. http://www.crimesolutions.gov/ProgramDetails.aspx?ID=72
The rehabilitation model and parens patriae failed to prevent delinquency, and so the courts began to shift their methods to suit the times. The Supreme Court handed down a series of decisions in the 1960s and 1970s providing due process rights to juveniles. Some of the rights involved included right to counsel, a right to confront witnesses, and a notice of charges. Congress also took action during this time period, passing the JJDP Act in 1974. This law granted funding to juvenile justice programs, and enforced deinstitutionalization of status offenders and non-offenders, mandating that delinquents not be held with adult
Meng, A., Segal, R., & Boden, E. (2013). American juvenile justice system: History in the making. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 25(3), 275-278. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0062
NIJ (National Institute of Justice) interviewed countless professionals at their sponsored symposium about what is expected of the criminal justice system in coming years. Bryan J. Vila a former chief of the Office of Justice Programs, explained that if technology evolves, the crime
According to the (Office of Justice, 1999), these programs are established by communities to provide an...
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, also know as the FBI is an interesting topic. The FBI is the “principal investigative arm of the United States Department of Justice”, also known as DOJ. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is responsible in collecting facts and giving or writing reports that one has either perceived, investigated or observed. As well as, assembling evidence in cases that involve Federal jurisdiction and assembling evidence. Not to mention, it bestows law enforcement leadership and reinforcement to international and state law enforcement agencies, which enforce the law.
Pros of the restorative justice system are that it brings parties together in crime. Instead of a short term goal, the restorative justice system takes a long-term approach to reducing crime and violence using different kinds of methods. In restorative justice programs, offenders work with others affected by their criminal actions. Restorative justice promotes instilling positive behaviors in young criminals and teaching long-lasting changes in behavior to prevent future crimes. There also could be negative consequences from the restorative justice system. For restorative justice to work, criminals and their victims must communicate about the crime and its consequences. Since violent crimes often leave victims feeling helpless and vulnerable, encouraging communication can result in increased anxiety and fear. Additionally, communication might breach confidentiality for victims of violent crimes, such as rape and assault, because they must discuss the outcome of the crime and how it has impacted
Over the years many laws and policies have been created and altered. As a result many activities have become illegal. With so many laws in place now, juvenile crime is also on the rise. More and more juveniles are being sent to prison than ever before. The goal of the juvenile justice system was to rehabilitate but now it is more focused on punishment. However, many rehabilitation programs are still in place to help delinquent juveniles get back on the path to becoming successful productive members of society. One program that comes to mind is the restorative justice program.
According to RJ perspective, a crime is considered a conflict between individuals that result in harm to victims, communities, and offenders, and so these parties are also involved in responding to it. One of the prevalent programs of the RJ system is victim-offender mediation (VOM) program. VOM program is a process which provides interested victims an opportunity to meet the offender, in a safe and structured setting, with the goal of holding the offender directly accountable for their behaviour while providing assistance and compensation to the victims; mediators do not impose settlements. Over the years, the VOM program has proved to be beneficial to both, the victim and the offender.
The dilemma of juvenile incarceration is a problem that thankfully has been declining, but still continues to be an ethical issue. The de-incarceration trend has coincided with a decrease in crime. It is hopeful that our nation is changing the approach to the treatment of juveniles in the criminal justice system. It means we know what to do and what is working, now just to follow through and continue the change to creating a juvenile justice system that is truly rehabilitative and gives youth tools to be able to be positive members of