Unhappy Meals Summary

563 Words2 Pages

In the article “Unhappy Meals,” Michael Pollan gives an ordinary person an overview of what food really is. Pollan starts out by saying, “If you’re concerned about your health, you should probably avoid food products that make health claims.” I feel like Americans today go out of their way to find foods that make health claims, because they truly believe what the food distributors are marketing. So many people trust everything that health food distributors say and don’t take time to actually read the labels and understand nutritional facts. Pollan, throughout the whole article, points out that almost everything we eat is nutrient enhanced food. He said that he believes that the food people are eating now days are worse for you than past generations. …show more content…

One of the main topics that Pollan discusses is to eat less. Something Americans have had an extreme issue with. He points out that it’s just as important to eat less as it is to focus on eating only healthy foods. I agree with this statement. For instance, you could eat only spinach for a week, but you could still have the potential to be as big as someone who eats a fast food once a week. Either way you still aren’t getting all the nutrients you’re body needs. In the bad science portion of the article Pollan states, “These molecules (which plants produce to protect themselves from the highly reactive oxygen atoms produced in photosynthesis) vanquish the free radicals in our bodies, which can damage DNA and initiate cancers. At least that’s how it seems to work in the test tube. Yet as soon as you remove these useful molecules from the context of the whole foods they’re found in, as we’ve done in creating antioxidant supplements, they don’t work at all,” He explains that some nutrients are more streamed-lined with other nutrients, but are too complex for scientist to duplicate. We shouldn’t be able to produce these natural

Open Document