Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
America's gun culture
Correlation of mental illness and violence
Canada gun control legislation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: America's gun culture
In the documentary “Bowling for Columbine” by Michael Moore, there were two scenes that stood out to me about the comparison between America and Canada. These scenes are the brief history of America and Michael Moore visiting Windsor, Canada. These scenes show the contrast between the two countries.
In the scene Brief history of America, it uses cartoon to portray the silly nature of how America’s guns laws have come to be. They start off by showing how Americans were scared of everyone so they went to the new world, there they started to kill all the natives, killed English men for Independence, then gun laws came in, they brought slaves over to do all their work, A Civil War broke out and the North won, KKK and NRA were formed, African
…show more content…
This was so he could show the viewer how Americans saying that they were brought up to be gun owners is just childish excuses that they say to blame on why America has so many gun related deaths compared to the rest of the world. But is America really safe? With all these relaxed gun laws and Americas history, is it safe or is it as dangerous as the statistics tell us? Moore used very patriotic music to symbolise Americas very selfabsest history of them having the viewpoint that they are the most safest independent country out there. Moore shows the irony of what Americans think of their country to what their history really was. The use of title of “Or did they” on a black screen, this changed the tone of the documentary from a ironic comedy carton into a more serious rhetorical question asking is America as safe as they think they are. In 2011 The United States of America had a total of 8,583 firearm murders, this had come down by 3% from 2010. Firearm murders were 68% of all murder in the United States in 2011 (http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/jan/10/gun-crime-us-state). California had the most firearm murders of 2011 with …show more content…
The scene starts of with Moore going to Windsor Canada, he interviews local Canadians, he interviews Americans on why Canada has fewer firearm related deaths, he goes and interviews a Canadian gun store owner, he then brought amo to show how easy acces anyone has to it and then goes and opens doors to see if the houses in Windsor really were left unlocked. Moore used the effect of interview in this scene to show how Canadians were comfortable in how safe they feel even though robberies could happen they had no fear about being murdered. Moore wanted to show the audience what real people thought about safety in Canada, he used the technique Vox Pop to show this by asking members of the public to say do they think Canada is safe and asked if they would leave their doors unlocked. Moore backed this up by going into peoples houses to see if they really do leave their doors unlocked. Canada isn 't afraid of firearms but they do have less firearm related murders than America. Moore also uses the technique of Music by playing jazz music, this is to set a happy mood and by making it happy it gives off the feel of safty. In a study from 2012 (http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jul/22/gun-homicides-ownership-world-list) they list the number of homicides by firearm by country. America had a total of 9,146 in
Consequently, “In recent years, tragedies involving mass killings in the US, such as The Aurora, CO movie theatre shooting in July 2012, and the Newton, CT has intensified social focus on trying to understand the dynamics and contributing factors that underlie such events”(Towers 2). Both of these shooting left the public shocked and concerned. As an article says one of the main concerns was “concern with the publics understanding of the shooting specifically who or what did the public blame” (Joslyn, and Do...
Moore uses ethos in his work by giving us descriptive details and facts on other shootings and gun sells in America. Moore’s audience is more likely to give him creditability because of the way he dresses. In the movie he goes about looking like any
Hysteria. Terror. Paranoia. All words used to describe feelings after a school disturbance. Reports of such emergencies from mainstream media outlets cause some to conclude extraordinary security breaches happen on an almost daily basis. However, schools are actually safeguarded; in recent years, protocols have been installed in schools across the United States to ensure safety. The catalyst: nationwide panic and suffering after an act of terror at a high school in Littleton, Colorado. Journalist and author Dave Cullen, in his book, Columbine, narrates the horror surrounding this shooting. Cullen’s purpose is to inform readers by captivating their attention utilizing emotional language. He establishes contrasting characters and alludes to significant
The present essay aims to analyze the connection between American society and gun ownership. Also what this can provoke on the citizens. These issues have been highly debatable over the past fourteen years since the massacre on Columbine High School occurs on April 20, 1999. As gun ownership is closely related to availability of firearms, the people who are against this civil duty of bearing arms to defend themselves and theirs are terrified of being shot, so the fear has spread over the country. Another relevant aspect is the discrimination of students from Columbine School since the existing paranoia. Students are taken to court to declare about their ‘misbehavior’. Finally, all these negative feelings have increased within the country creating a division having ‘firearms’ as guilty.
The columbine massacre the day where no one is safe in school or out of school. The columbine massacre is about two students named Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris both seniors 17 years old both two weeks before graduating they killed 12 students, one teacher, and 21 injured to their shooting on April 20, 1999. Both Dylan and Eric were some believe they were bullied by the sport teams in their school so they planned to kill the people who bullied them and other mostly anyone who gets in their way but that wasn’t really why the FBI he said that there target was everyone no one in pacify we will not get in to more details now. Dylan and Eric were both intelligent boys with solid parents and a good home and both had brothers younger than them. They played soccer, baseball, and both enjoyed to work on computers. Both boys were thinking on commit suicide on 1997 but instead started to plan a massacre in 1998 a year before it happened. Then the two boys had got into some trouble for breaking into a van on January 30, 1998 trying to steal some fuses and wires for bombs for them to make, but they got caught in trouble. So the court put them in a program called the juvenile diversion program, but even if they were there they were still planning the massacre and the court also put Eric in some angry management classes and people believe it worked but it didn’t he just did it to look like it work and both boys made it look like they were really sorry but they weren’t. Dylan and Eric both really hated everyone in their school and the court as well after they got caught breaking in to that van that’s when they really started to plan the massacre more and that’s when Harris started he’s journals no one really knows way but they didn’t hate a hand...
In the documentary Bowling for Columbine by Michael Moore, it asks important questions and provokes thoughts. The United States is known to have the highest gun-murder rate in the world. Not that shocking if you watch the news. The media influences fear in the heart of Americans and creates hysteria all over the globe. The documentary had me thinking why are we in fear well for example every day there is always something violent going on in the news a shooting, someone getting stabbed, a woman’s purse get lifted. The media is inflicting fear in our hearts and we really just let it happen without saying a word. In my opinion I think it’s a disguise from the big picture. What is the United States hiding from the American people? The documentary started off with Michael going into a Bank and from my understanding if you open up an account with the bank you can take advantage of their special offer of being able to pick any type of gun that is advertised which I thought was completely crazy especially when the guns are stored in the bank.
In order to understand the complexity of the Anti-Americanism, it is important to understand the history and relationship between Canada and the United States. The sentiment was first conceived by the Europeans and the issues it had with the upcoming “rebellious” American culture. Europeans at the time had the tendency to see Americans as, “overconfident and self-important… it was this egocentricity that most aggravated Europeans” (O’Connor, 2004). In its earliest form, the American ideology seemed to be an opponent to the popular European ideology. Which soon became a campaign between “high culture” (the European ideology) and “low culture” (the American culture) and through that rivalry many European citizens held the belief that,
It is interestingly sad how debates on gun violence and gun control is being handled in our society by our top leaders and lobbyist. Gun control has become a serious issue and a national epidemic, however, the debate is far from over. In the article “under the gun” by writers Rottenberg, Rice and Franich, for entertainment weekly, the writers discussed the failing of gun control laws and the increase in gun violence. By setting sides of their argument, the writers discussed violence in movies, TVs and videogames and how this violence impact our society, thus allowing their audience to decide for themselves.
McMahan backs up his premises by showing that in other “Western Countries, per capita homicide rates, as well as rates of violent crime involving guns, are a fraction of what they are in the United States.” (McMahan, 4). Gun advocates deny this claim, but then what could be the reason for the United States being the homicide capital of the developed world? Essentially, I believe that McMahan has a solid, compelling argument that makes readers believe that we should take more steps in the direction of banning guns. The analogies he places within the article make for a descriptive, persuasive argument, yet McMahan lacks statistics and factual information to back up his claims.
Newman, Garfield et al. Canada A Nation Unfolding. Toronto: Mc Graw – Hill Ryerson Limited, 2000.
Thompson, John Herd, and Mark Paul Richard. "Canadian History in North American Context." In Canadian studies in the new millennium. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. 37-64.
Carter, Gregg. Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2012. Print.
Canada as a nation has been striving to characterize itself as more ?Canadian? for decades. This has included numerous struggles and events such as protests, bans, and the creation of the Massey Commission, to encourage national development in the arts, and support major companies like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and National Film Board (NFB). However, this has not been an easy task for the Canadian government, as major influences from below the border (the United States) have been captivating the Canadian audiences by large. American media has had a momentous revolutionizing effect on Canada, even through efforts made to define Canada with its own cultural identity.
Today Canada and the United States are major trading partners, allies, and two neighboring countries with a long history of cooperation with each other. But is it possible for Canada to protect its independence and culture living next door to the country so powerful and rich as the United States. Since the Canadian confederation, Canada started developing relations with the U.S. As the years passed by, Canada began to relay on the United States in the national defense. Many Canadians think that the military, political and economical dependence would not make a difference to their daily life. But today more then even Canadian culture is affected by the American influence. Media, American artists, economic dependence, American propaganda and political pressure from the United States is making Canada too Americanized. All of these factors reflect on the social life of ordinary Canadians threatening the heritage and the traditions that define Canada as independent country.
There are three ways to approach gun-control: first, it is the citizens’ constitutional right to own firearms; second, firearms kill - get rid of them; and third, to have no opinion and not deal with the issue. Whichever view people have on gun-control, they must first understand the facts and statistics of these issues. Charlton Heston’s “Is Freedom Lost on the Next Generation?” and Paul Craig Robert’s “Unarmed and Unsafe” both study the opposing side of gun-control with facts and logic.