Turtles Can Fly And Edge Of Heaven

833 Words2 Pages

National cinema is a hard to define film critical term. Higson (as cited in Simpson, 2014) argues that ‘categories of nation-state cinema should include the range of films in circulation within a nation-state’. There is nothing wrong with this claim in the account of nation-state cinema, but national cinema are way beyond the national boundary, whether in its circulation or content, besides national boundaries are moveable. In this essay, I will discuss the films Turtles Can Fly (Bahman Ghobadi, 2004) and Edge of Heaven (Fatih Akin, 2007) to analyze national cinema as the beachhead of third cinema is a vital term in interpret cinema. At the start, I will explore the situation when national cinema engaging with different audiences; then, I will …show more content…

For most blockbusters, an organic and coordinated national community are easy to conquer with a meaningful national state, such as patriotism. But in some cases, the experience of migration, diaspora, changing and homeless provide by national cinema will prevail. This is to say in these situation the allegiances outside of national and other belonging above national will be greater awareness and understanding. Turtles Can Fly and Edge of Heaven offers the best explanation. Under normal circumstances, regular practice of mass communication plays an important role in the process of closely untied people with common value as a collective society, but, does that mean the collective state must be national? Indeed, a particular aspect of society after fully discussion of press, television, internet and headlines will produce much strong repercussions rather than the list of figures. But are these media events as a national phenomenon has been the most fully understand? As Hamid (2006) indicates that ‘we tend to think of national cinema as only informing us about the nation in which is originated. But, on the other hand, we tend to trust our own national media to provide news of the …show more content…

Take example of Crocodile Dundee, which succeed both in Australia and the United States, some people are neither have the sense of sympathy nor expect to experience their national identity even though they are attracted by the text of the film. As Cao (2012) criticizes that ‘the construction of Australianness in the Dundee saga is defined in relation to the American Empire’. Unlike mainstream film, Turtles Can Fly and Edge of Heaven highlights the imagined community of transnational experience rather than the own experience. Hamid (2006) suggests that, ‘in the case of Iran, which is almost completely closed off to Western eyes, we have been largely dependent on Iranian filmmakers to allow us any view of the country at all’. Although cannot make sure that all the audiences correct understanding transnational scope in different ways, but the spectators will convert these experience into their own reference of cultural frame, and used in different texts and purposes. Scott (2005) has comments that, ‘Mr. Ghobadi has set out to give the Kurds a national cinema, and to bring their traditions and their language, as well as their troubles, to the attention of global audiences’. In the occasion of foreign national cinema international launch, non-native audiences are a mixture

Open Document