Trickle-Down Economic Vs Keynesian Economics

606 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effectiveness of new deal programs of president franklin roosevelt

When it comes to dealing with the recession, there are usually two main schools of thought, Trickle-down economics and Keynesian economics. Trickle-down economics, also known as Supply-side, focuses more on slashing taxes to helping the rich who in turn help the poor. Where as Keynesian economics puts more emphasis on government spending to help stimulate aggravated demand. Aggravated demand simply means the total amount of goods or services demanded at a certain time. Keynesian policies were developed in the 1930s by the British economist John Maynard Keynes. Until this time classical economists believed that there was a natural boom-bust cycle to the economy that was modest and self-regulating. For the most part they were right. That is until …show more content…

First, he proposed that the government should reduce interest rates. Second they should begin investing in infrastructure, which increases the amount of income in the economy, causing increased spending by the public. Hypothetically, this expanded spending increases business investment, along with more production to meet the increased demand. This course of action jumpstarts a doomed economy and, voila, no more Great Depression. FDR implemented Kenyes’ second approach with the creation of government projects such as the building of railroads and national parks. By combining Keynes’ ideas with Roosevelt's government run job programs America was able to pull itself out of the Great Depression and return to a time economic stability. The question now circulating is will Keynesian economic work in today’s day and age. If it worked so well in the 30s clearly it should work again. Right? Well the answer is not that simple. The reason Keynesian economics worked so well back then was not because of this prefect economic solution but rather because of the war. The start of WWII forced the government to increase spending in order to manufacture the necessary equipment needed for the war effort. Consequent endeavors to spend ourselves out of subsidence, for example, endeavors at present in progress by the Obama organization, have been less successful without a war to

Show More
Related

  • Economic History of Prince Edward Island

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    By definition, an economic depression is a “sustained, long-term downturn in economic activity in one or more economies.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_depression) The latter, is far worse then a recession. A recession is merely an economic slowdown, which was experienced by most Atlantic Provinces in the late 19th century.

    Read More

  • Literary Analysis: Money Well Spent By Michael Grabell

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    As an illustration, Michael Grabell speaks about signs of recession in March 2009; and how the recession consumed many states across the United States in the fall of 2008. Employment rates were decreasing, Unemployment rates were off the charts and there were many house foreclosures. Furthermore, in Krugman’s Economics for AP* it goes more into depth about the signs of recessions and house foreclosures which can be seen in Module 2. Here, it talks about the many signs of recessions-- inflation, deflation and labor force, which is the total amount of people that are employed and unemployed. In addition to, which they are vigorously looking for work but are not currently employed. Moreover, a few modules ahead Krugman’s textbook also talks about what some individuals did to survive the recession. For instance, Home foreclosures caused tax revenues to plummet. Not to mention, how at the same time more people sought Medicaid and food stamps to survive the recession.

    Read More

  • How Roosevelt And His New Deal Prolonged The Great Depression

    1397 Words  | 3 Pages

    The traditional view of Franklin D. Roosevelt is that he motivated and helped the United States during the “Great Depression” and was a great president, however, as time has passed, economist historians have begun analyzing Roosevelt’s presidency. Many have concluded that he did not help America during the Great Depression but instead amplified and prolonged the depression. Jim Powell wrote about FDR economic policies and did an excellent job explaining Roosevelt’s incompetent initiatives. Roosevelt did not know anything about economics and his advisors made everything worse by admiring the Soviet Union.

    Read More

  • Response Of Socialism To Classical Liberalism

    748 Words  | 2 Pages

    Franklin D. Roosevelt, president of the united states from 1933 to 1945 (and the distant cousin of Theodore Roosevelt), was the first to convert to Keynes’s theories. He implemented massive public works programs to put people to work. Called the “New Deal”, an echo of Theodore Roosevelt’s square deal, it consisted of a series of programs from 1933 to 1938. As well as providing employment through massive works projects such as the Tennessee valley authority, which built dams to generate electricity. New deal programs provided emergency relief, reformed the banking system, and tried to invigorate agriculture and the economy. Many other programs were also put into place with were used to attemp...

    Read More

  • Comparing Keynesian Economics and Supply Side Economic Theories

    506 Words  | 2 Pages

    Comparing Keynesian Economics and Supply Side Economic Theories Two controversial economic policies are Keynesian economics and Supply Side economics. They represent opposite sides of the economic policy spectrum and were introduced at opposite ends of the 20th century, yet still are the most famous for their effects on the economy of the United States when they were used. The founder of Keynesian economic theory was John Maynard Keynes.

    Read More

  • FDR and the Depression

    809 Words  | 2 Pages

    All of this is true. Roosevelt’s deficit spending, provoked by the English economist John Maynard Keynes, did add to the already high national debt while his programs did not solve the record-high unemployment rate. This “enormous outpouring of federal money for human relief and immense sums for public-works projects [that] started to flow to all points of the compass” and nearly doubled the nation’s debt also brought about many changes that were, in a large sense, revolutionary (Document C).... ... middle of paper ...

    Read More

  • The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008

    1076 Words  | 3 Pages

    The main ideas in Krugman’s book revolve around the “Keynesian Compact” or the “neoclassical consensus”. Krugman suggests five general solutions based on the economist, John Maynard Keynes’ theories: put more capital into the banking system to unfreeze the markets, make a program for the government to lend money, work hand-in-hand with other countries, use government stimulus plans, reform and regulate the capitalistic market system.

    Read More

  • Great Depression vs. The Great Recession

    1439 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since being founded, America became a capitalist society. Being a capitalist society obtains luxurious benefits and rather harsh consequences if gone bad. In a capitalist society people must buy products and spend money to keep the economy balanced, but once those people stop spending money, the economy goes off balance and the nation enters a recession. Once a recession drastically takes a downturn, the nation enters what is known as a depression. In 2008 America entered a recession and its consequences were severe enough for some people, such as President Barack Obama, to compare the recent crisis to the world’s darkest economic depression in history, the Great Depression. Although the Great Depression and the Great Recession of 2008 hold similarities and differences between the stock market and government spending, political issues, lifestyle changes, and wealth distribution, the Great Depression proved far more detrimental consequences than the Recession.

    Read More

  • The Great Recession

    670 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every few years, countries experience an economic decline which is commonly referred to as a recession. In recent years the U.S. has been faced with overcoming the most devastating global economic hardships since the Great Depression. This period “a period of declining GDP, accompanied by lower real income and higher unemployment” has been referred to as the Great Recession (McConnell, 2012 p.G-30). This paper will cover the issues which led to the recession, discuss the strategies taken by the Government and Federal Reserve to alleviate the crisis, and look at the future outlook of the U.S. economy. By examining the nation’s economic struggles during this time period (2007-2009), it will conclude that the current macroeconomic situation deals with unemployment, which is a direct result of the recession.

    Read More

  • The 2008 Economic Recession

    1050 Words  | 3 Pages

    Looking back to the Carter and Reagan Administration’s, you can begin to see where the Recession originated from. Prior to the Reagan administration, the United States economy experienced a decade of rising unemployment and inflation. Political pressure favored stimulus resulting in an expansion of the money supply. Reagan wanted to increase defense spending while lowering taxes, Reagan's approach was a departure from his immediate predecessors. Reagan enacted lower marginal tax rates in combination with simplified income tax codes and continued deregulation. During Reagan's presidency the annual deficits averaged 4.2% of GDP after inheriting an annual deficit of 2.7% of GDP in 1980 under President Carter. The real

    Read More

  • FDR DBQ

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Great Depression was one of the greatest challenges that the United States faced during the twentieth century. It sidelined not only the economy of America, but also that of the entire world. The Depression was unlike anything that had been seen before. It was more prolonged and influential than any economic downturn in the history of the United States. The Depression struck fear in the government and the American people because it was so different. Calvin Coolidge even said, "In other periods of depression, it has always been possible to see some things which were solid and upon which you could base hope, but as I look about, I now see nothing to give ground to hope—nothing of man." People were scared and did not know what to do to address the looming economic crash. As a result of the Depression’s seriousness and severity, it took unconventional methods to fix the economy and get it going again. Franklin D. Roosevelt and his administration had to think outside the box to fix the economy. The administration changed the role of the government in the lives of the people, the economy, and the world. As a result of the abnormal nature of the Depression, the FDR administration had to experiment with different programs and approaches to the issue, as stated by William Lloyd Garrison when he describes the new deal as both assisting and slowing the recovery. Some of the programs, such as the FDIC and works programs, were successful; however, others like the NIRA did little to address the economic issue. Additionally, the FDR administration also created a role for the federal government in the everyday lives of the American people by providing jobs through the works program and establishing the precedent of Social Security...

    Read More

  • Summary Of Positive Government

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    I believe that it's’ important to use our constitution as a guiding tool to help appoint the correct people for the job.John Maynard Keynes was a British economist where he fundamentally changed the theory and practices of macroeconomics and economic policies of government. Although he was revolutionary most of his policies were controversial and used Keynesianism economic to get people to stay away from them . His approach to macroeconomic management was different since the previous traditional laissez-faire economists believed that an economy would automatically correct its imbalances and move toward a state of equilibrium, They expected the dynamics of supply and demand to help the economy adjust to recession and inflation without government action. Laissez-faire economics thus regarded layoffs, bankruptcies and downturns in the economy not as something to be avoided but as elements of a natural process that would eventually improve. However that was not the case for the great depression. Keynes also believed that a given level of demand in an economy would produce employment however he insisted that low employment during the depression resulted from inadequate

    Read More

  • Classical And Keynesian Economics: The Concepts Of Classical Economics

    914 Words  | 2 Pages

    Regardless, in regards to applying Keynesian economic policies toward the Great Depression, Former Federal Reserve Governor Ben S. Bernanke said “You 're right, we did it. We 're very sorry. … we won 't do it again” (Federal Reserve Board, 2002). Other economic theory must be developed to address some of the shortcomings of the Keynesian economic

    Read More

  • Classical Economics vs. Keynesian Economics

    1187 Words  | 3 Pages

    Keynesian Economics was developed and founded by John Maynard Keynes. He believed and wrote in his book “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money” that it is essential for the Government to play a vital role in economic stability. Keynesian theorists believe government spending, tax hikes and tax breaks are vital to economic success. Keynesian assumptions include: Rigid or Inflexible Prices, Effective Demand, and Savings-Investment Determinants. Rigid or Inflexible Prices suggest that wage increases are easier to take while wage decreases hit resistance; likewise, a producer will increase prices yet when needed will be reluctant to decrease prices.

    Read More

  • Comparing Two Idealogies - Neoliberalism and Keynesianism

    1367 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our lives are greatly affected by our culture, ecological environment, political environment and our economic structure. The overarching method of organizing a complex modern society relies heavily on the founding economic theories regarding method of production, method of organization, and the distribution of wealth among the members of. This paper, specifically deals with the views and theoretical backgrounds of two dominant theories of the past century, Keynesianism and Neo-liberalism. Our social economic order is product of the two theories and has evolved through many stages to come to where it is today. The two ideologies rely on different foundations for their economic outcomes but both encourage capitalism and claim it to be the superior form of economic organization. Within the last quarter of the 20th century, neo-liberalism has become the dominant ideology driving political and economic decisions of most developed nations. This dominant ideology creates disparities in wealth and creates inequality through the promotion of competitive markets free from regulation. Neo-liberal’s ability to reduce national government’s size limits the powers and capabilities of elected representatives and allows corporations to become much larger and exert far greater force on national and provincial governments to act in their favour. Hence, it is extremely important at this time to learn about the underlying power relations in our economy and how the two ideologies compare on important aspects of political economy. In comparing the two theories with respect to managing the level of unemployment, funding the welfare sates, and pursuing national or international objectives, I will argue that Keynesianism provides far greater stability, equ...

    Read More

More about Trickle-Down Economic Vs Keynesian Economics

Open Document