Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Medieval warfare technology
Warfare in the medieval era
Notes about trebuchet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The trebuchet was the apex of non-explosive projectile-based siege weapons to predate the cannon. The trebuchet was one of many non-explosive projectile-based siege weapons developed over the preceding 2 millennia. The largest and most powerful "nuclear option" trebuchet was known as the Loup-de-Guerre, which was Anglicized as the War Wolf. A trebuchet is a catapult, but not all catapults are trebuchets. Other catapults include siege engines called the Onager, Mangonel, Ballista, and the Springald. The difference between trebuchets and these other catapults were the mechanics of throwing the projectile. Non-trebuchet catapults are powered by torsion. The energy is stored in twisted animal sinew or vine-based ropes. Trebuchets are powered by a large counterweight or counterforce, which when released, falls and pulls a swing arm up and over with a sling containing the projectile. At the right angle the sling is released sending the projectile to the target. In its simplest form, a trebuchet is a lever. Trebuchets were first used in China …show more content…
This was created by King Edward "Longshanks" in 1302 to lay siege to Scotland's, Sterling Castle. The Scottish defenders refused his surrender demands, until the War Wolf was built and completed within sight of them. They surrendered immediately after seeing it nearing the end of its construction. However, their surrender was not accepted, seeing as King Edward wished to test its capabilities since they had made him build it. This trebuchet is thought to have been able to throw a 300 lb. object over 200 yards. Modern day engineers theorize that the projectile would have reached speeds of 120 mph as it was propelled by a 15 to 20 ton counterweight, with a frame that was 400 ft. tall. After firing it several times and destroying entire buildings and sections of wall, King Edward accepted the Scotts' surrender. This was literally the "nuclear option" of the Middle
This is a brief paragraph or two on each of the major siege weapons. For the not just the besiegers but also the defenders. Please note most of these weapons were not used alone and often had many different versions of the same weapon.
According to Chevedden et al., (2002) the Latin word for trebuchet was “ingenium” and those who designed, made and used them were called inginators. These early engineers kept modifying the trebuchet to increase the range and impact force. One of the improvements engineers made was varying the length of the sling ropes so the shot left the machine at a ? angle of 45 degrees to the vertical (shown in the figure above), which produces the longest trajectory (Chevedden et al.,
Question 5: “Texts construct characters who represent the best qualities in human nature, as well as those who represent the worst.” Discuss how at least ONE character is constructed in a text you have read or viewed. (Sem 2, 2016)
The image indicates that the man on the bottom has forgotten about the trebuchet and is more focused on the cannons abilities because of the gunpowders tactics. Since the cannon is increasingly more compelling than the trebuchet, men in the Middle Age started to transition to gunpowder- based technology knowing that gunpowder was more effective and powerful. The image could also be seen as soldiers thinking that cannons are more of a effective weapon since it’s chosen over the trebuchet. Gunpowder was the primary propellant in cannons by making the cannon fire the iron/steel ball to its enemies. It drove the ball upward causing a smokey effect resulting in a large sound from the kinetic energy towards the heavy ball. By 1350, cannons and other gunpowder based weapons were regularly used in the English and French armies. Therefore, the transition from medieval artillery to modern artillery truly impacted the fighting style in Europe. Gunpowder gave warfare a fresh start to create powerful weapons that ultimately made Europe and many more places stronger in the long run. In the end, there was now a quicker way to defeat an entire army more sufficiently and
Even though all trebuchets were similar in design, they were all made up of different materials. Heavy lead weights or a pivoting ballast box were the counter weights on many of the medieval trebuchets. They would also use leather pouches as the sack and then build the frame and arm out of wood/trees. During the medieval times, countries new that building walls would slow down enemy troops. The only issues with this are that they would not be able to defend against the trebuchets that are throwing one ton stones. The trebuchets were able to lock in on accuracy by judging how far their max throw is and would then move it depending on need for more or less distance. The way the modern trebuchet is being used today is mostly for teaching purposes. Colleges have been using this to help students think outside the box and create new trebuchets that can throw huge missiles like a car. We have seen many new ideas and ways to make a modern trebuchet, but all of these trebuchets are based on a single blueprint that was made over 900 years ago. In conclusion, trebuchets can be dated back to the 12th century where they were used for military strategies to throw heavy
Archers weren’t the only badasses of the battlefield; other destructive weapons also created terror in the hearts of the enemy. Every city and castle feared the appearance of siege engines, especially the devastating counterweight trebuchet. This powerful gravity-driven engine could reduce a city’s walls to rubble. Infantry and cavalry alike feared the awesome pike formations of the Swiss and Landsknecht armies. Essentially a really long spear, the pike’s very simplicity provided a remarkable tactical versatility in many medieval battles.
The name of the Trebuchet is ironic, being a French originated word, when this mechanical weapon was first invented in 300 BC, China (Alchin, “Trebuchet”). However, the machine that the Chinese used in the beginning, did not resemble the modern-day Trebuchet, and worked more like a sling. Sadly, this Trebuchet did not have the wished for results by the Chinese. Consequently, this weapon went through changes before it came to be the Medieval Weapon we think of today, the weapon that “overthrew” it’s two predecessors the catapult and ballista (“The Trebuchet”).
The mangonel, somehow, had some design flaw in that is called for a wooden barrier to be a concept. It is place in catapult history is nonetheless well documented as this model was still used when the trebuchet arrived on the scene. Unlike it is earlier Greek brother. The mongonel is counted as a easier design in history of catapult.
hundred pounds each of four cannons - a British and American cannon from the battle of
The canister shot was a wooden cartridge carrying iron balls and when fired would explode like a shotgun for shorter range personnel. The cannons were mostly low trajectory as opposed to the mortars which were high trajectory and fire bomb shells. The mortar was based on a wooden platform and a wedge of wood was used to incline the front of the barrel. There were land service mortars and sea service mortars. The land service being more mobile and the sea service much heavier and were permanently positioned on ships.
The U. S. Soldiers used the M-79 40mm, also known as the thumper, which looked like a sawed shotgun. It could fire up to 300 meters and fire a 6.5 pound grenade. The M-72 is a BBMM light anti-tank weapon that weighs 5.2 pounds. It was also used as a bunker buster and fired a 1 kg rocket that could travel 300 meters. (173dairborne)”
Another type of catapult is the Onager. Onagers were used right up to the middle ages with the Trebuchet, when gunpowder and the Cannon were invented and eventually replaced the catapults.
“Volley Guns” (Chivers, 2010, p.26) or also known as “Organ Guns” (Ellis, 1975, p.10) were first attempts at increasing firepower by adding several barrels at the firing itself, rather than simply attempting to increase the rate of fire. “Gunsmiths had long ago learned to place barrels side by side on frames to create firearms capable of discharging projectiles in rapid succession. These unwieldy devices, or volley guns, were capable in theory of blasting a hole in a line of advancing soldiers” (Chivers, 2010, p.26). An example of such weapons can be seen on July 28, 1835 when Giuseppe Fieshi unleashed terror on King Louis-Phillipe in Paris, France. He fired his 25 barrel “volley gun”, killing 18 of the king's entourage and grazing the King's skull. The weapon was ineffective however. Four of the barrels failed and another four ruptured. Two other barrels had exploded inside, grievously wounding Giuseppe. (Chivers, 2010, p. 27)
First the energy of conservation. The setting of the trebuchet before firing is shown in Fig 1. A heavy counterweight of mass (M) (contained in a large bucket) on the end of the short arm of a sturdy beam was raised to some height while a smaller mass (m) (the projectile), was positioned on the end of the longer arm near or on the ground. In practice the projectile was usually placed in a leather sling attached to the end of the longer arm. However for simplicity, we shall ignore the sling and compensate for this omission by increasing the assumed length of the beam on the projectile’s side. The counterweight was then allowed to fall so that the longer arm swung upward, the sling following, and the projectile was ultimately thrown from its container at some point near the top of the arc. The far end of the sling was attached to the arm by a rope in such a way that the release occurred at a launching angle near the optimum value ( most likely by repeated trials) for the launch height. The launching position is shown in fig.2 where we have assumed that the projectile is released at the moment the entire beam is vertical. In the figures: (a)=height of the pivot, (b)= length of the short arm, (c)= length of the long arm, while (v) and (V) are the velocities of (m) and (M), respectively, at the moment of launching.
The word trebuchet comes from the Middle French verb trebuch, meaning ‘to tumble’ or ‘to fall over,’ which is exactly what the throwing arm of a trebuchet does when it is released. The medieval etymology of the word (first appearing in English in the fourteenth century as ‘trepegete’) has led many historians to believe that this war engine was a medieval invention, but this ‘bad neighbor’ took up residence in the annals of military history long before that.