Women In The Homecoming

2584 Words6 Pages

Harold Pinter was a British playwright, director, poet, actor, and political activist. Most of his plays focused on pitting male weakness and insecurity against female strength and survival and the themes were usually power and sex. Pinter’s career did not reach a turning point until he wrote The Caretaker which secured his fame and prompted loads of commissions. It also led to the unravelling of his marriage. His ex-wife Vivien became a sort of embodiment of a certain kind of Pinter woman. A Pinter woman is almost always black stockinged, high heeled, and a combination of external gentility and inner passion. As Pinter’s marriage to Vivien declined he engaged in numerous affairs. His attitude toward women has always been a source of debate. …show more content…

In the early 60’s Pinter wrote three plays and the female characters progressed toward more focused characters that are socially capable and very functional. In The Homecoming, Pinter develops his characters to lack a connection to the audience. The audience is meant to sense that there is a presence of communication among the characters thus forcing the audience out of the spectator role and in to the role of an outsider. William J. Free states in his article ‘Treatment of Character in Harold Pinter’s The Homecoming’ that; “The Homecoming is the most extreme use of this device” (2). Looking at the character of Ruth the audience can see how, through her dialogue, she does not allow herself to reveal any motivation to the other characters or to the audience. She has a line in the second act, where she says; “You’ve forgotten something. Look at me. I…move my leg. That’s all it is. But I …show more content…

She may very well be a symbol for something, but what that something is the audience just does not know. She had just achieved earning the sympathy of the audience, but Pinter is quick to destroy it by showing her in more sequences that are shocking and repulsive. The audience could try to dismiss these actions as they try to remain sympathetic. They look at her dance and kiss with Lenny and think they are the natural actions of a frustrated young woman whose husband is weak, but then they look at her treatment of Joey and begin to see her as a tease. The final blow that collapses the audience’s sympathy comes when she cold-bloodedly accepts the proposition to become the family prostitute. The audience can no longer blame her actions on frustration and unhappiness. Pinter, however, cannot even let this judgment of Ruth’s corrupt nature pass without a mixture of some other reaction. As Max begins to explain the arrangement to Ruth his words are obviously ironic, but what about how Ruth had replied? Is this naïveté or irony on her part? Pinter gives the audience nothing with which to base a judgment

Open Document