Trash In The 19th Century

525 Words2 Pages

Topic: The chosen subject matter is trash in the 19th and 20th centuries. The author focuses on the larger idea that the way one choses what is trash and what is not shows what class they are in while providing the change from the 19th century trash was almost absent due to basically everything being reused, to the 20th century where only certain classes were reusing things and disposal became separate from production, consumption, and use. Trash reveals the difference between classes. Thesis: The author argues that “trash is a dynamic category” (p5) and “that nothing is inherently trash” (p5). The author conveys that in the 19th century, there was little to no trash, because everything from rags to bones was reused, but as times changed, the population grew, and there were more people deciding they didn’t have any more …show more content…

Another underlying assumption is that people who can be more wasteful is an indicator of them having more money, means having power. This book might contribute to garbology, environmentalist, as well as oceanographers. Source Material: The author draws on many works that include that of anthropologists, Lars Eighner’s memoir of homelessness, household handbooks, newspapers and articles, business writer, and Cosmopolitan. The author uses her knowledge as well as the sources she chose to relay the idea of trash as a dynamic category. Counter Arguments: While the author states that we are not likely to go back to the stewardship days, we should be more conscious about the trash we produce, no matter our class, one thing a hostile reader could say is that the less trash we produce, it could hurt the economic system and the production of items. The economic system is run by production and labor, and if the production rate goes down, so does our economic

Open Document