Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Oedipus the Tragic Hero Oedipus is depicted as a “marionette in the hands of a daemonic power”(pg150), but like all tragic hero’s he fights and struggles against fate even when the odds are against him. His most tragic flaw is his morality, as he struggles between the good and the evil of his life. The good is that he was pitied by the Shepard who saved him from death as a baby. The evil is his fate, where he is to kill his father and marry his mother. His hubris or excessive pride and self-righteousness are the lead causes to his downfall. Oedipus is a tragic hero who suffers the consequences of his immoral actions, and must learn from these mistakes. This Aristotelian theory of tragedy exists today, as an example of what happens when men and women that fall from high positions politically and socially. Oedipus had good intentions for his people and tries to save the city when death is at its doorstep even admitting that they mean more to him that is own life “I grieve for these, my people far more that I fear for my own life”(106-106). His determination to seek the truth and care for his people not only makes him an admirable man but respectable king. His quest for truth no matter …show more content…
His ideal qualities of being intelligent and powerful, but not perfect, were not enough to keep his falling into misfortune. Like many tragic heroes despite their lofty positions who make mistakes they must suffer the consequences. He then becomes an example to us all to what happens when powerful men fall from high positions. The pain he suffered was inflicted upon himself because he though he was powerful enough to control his life but in reality he was powerless. The unavoidable fate to kill his father and marry his mother create pity from the audience for the fact that we can’t control what we were destined to do no matter how hard we
...ying the requirement of high status. Oedipus’ tragic flaw was his short temper, which led him to his downfall, as did Othello’s flaws of naivety and mistrust. Both plays went through a peripeteia and an anagnorisis, as both saw a reversal of fortune and a realization of their mistakes. All these elements of tragedy give the audience a feeling of pity and remorse for both Oedipus and Othello, thus reinforcing Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero.
Oedipus' search for the truth lead him to the discovery that he was not a "child of luck," but a "man of misfortune." His fate was determined years before his birth, as proven by the prophecy of the oracles. All he could do was live out his destiny, but he did this with such dignity and heroism. Oedipus showed great nobility even in suffering and despair. At the end of Oedipus at Colonus Oedipus pursued the truth to its horrible conclusion. Having blinded himself, Oedipus was a broken and shaken man. But he also became a model for people to imitate. He has shown what it means to endure in the face of defeat. He has shown what it takes to survive in a world that is ruled by unpredictable fate. He has shown the true meaning of suffering and despair. When you think of Oedipus, remember that he suffered for all of us, so that everyone can know the truth about ourselves in a world that will always be hostile and cruel.
Throughout the play we find that Oedipus, the protagonist of this Greek tragedy, is tested by life in a number of ways. To those in Athens who watched the performance of Oedipus the King, Oedipus appeared to be the embodiment of a perfect Athenian. He is self-confident, intelligent, and strong-willed. Ironically, these are the very traits which bring about his tragic discovery. He is portrayed as a character of social conscience whose tragedy stresses the vulnerability of human beings whose suffering is brought on by a combination of human and divine actions.
With every acclaim to success, there is a falling as intense as the ascent. Failure is the building block for success and without failure being the constant reminder that perfection is non-existent, great achievements could not be obtained. After an accomplishment, the world seems utopian, but not for everyone. Some feats end in the catastrophic demoralization of an individual. Aristotle believed the tragic hero to leave the mortal world in consternation after rising to a high societal stature, and using this as a basis, he developed the six characteristics of a tragic hero. Oedipus and Blanche, two tragic heroes with strong symbolic resemblance, rise to social success that ultimately seals their fate. Through desire for social attraction,
Arthur Miller alters Aristotle 's definition of the tragic hero and tragedy; Miller suggests that the common man is capable of experiencing the tragedy of a king because they experience "similar emotional situations"(148). Miller points out that the tragic feeling is induced when the character gives up everything to try to guard his personal dignity. The character is flawed but not too faulty in order to be relatable to the common man. However, the character flaw that causes his downfall isn 't a weakness. After his downfall, the common man learns a lesson Although Miller redefines the tragic character, Oedipus is still a suitable example. I completely agree with Arthur Miller’s points about the nature of tragedy and the tragic hero in the context of Oedipus and Oedipus Rex.
Therefore, the sheer act of venturing out to discover the truth behind his own destiny serves to validate Oedipus' heroic qualities. This can be seen in Tiresias' comment regarding "how dreadful knowledge of the truth can be when there is no help in the truth"(Lines 145-146). What is illustrated by this statement is the mindset that was held amongst those around Oedipus that seeking out truth is meaningless because fate will follow through regardless. In other words, knowing what will happen will not change what will happen, and therefore there is no logical need to torture oneself by seeking truth. Oedipus on the other hand, defies this way of thinking by stopping at nothing to seek out the truth behind his
If one is familiar with Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero, one may consider King Oedipus, from Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, as a potential example of an ideal tragic hero. Sophocles exemplifies the definition of a tragic hero in his portrayal of King Oedipus, in addition to masterfully constructing a tragedy that has lasted the ages and continues to thrive as a classic work of literature to this day. A brief review of Oedipus Rex reveals key elements when defining a tragic hero. The first is the situation, as it unfolds, is complex in nature. The protagonist, King Oedipus, is of nobility and high respect; however, he is also troubled personally by unresolved questions of his past. The second element is his hamartia or error, a tragic flaw of sorts. The last element is his fall from his position of power and respect, after the climax of the story.
In order to describe Oedipus as a tragic hero, one must begin by describing a tragedy. A tragedy must consist of a variety of elements in order to truly fulfill its purpose. According to Aristotle, the most important element is plot (175). Without the events that unify all aspects, the story would not be held together. It is the actions of the tragic hero that lead to his downfall, and that define his characteristics and set into motion all other aspects of the work. In Oedipus the King, it is Oedipus's attempt to avoid his destiny, an overt act of hubris, that leads to his rise in power and ultimate fall. In this aspect, he completely fulfills the job of a tragic hero.
At first, Oedipus is seen as a man of mighty feats; however, in the end, the remembrance of his great acts is overcome by the infamy of how he killed his father and married his mother. At the beginning of Socrates’ play, the priest cries out on the subject of the mighty acts the king, Oedipus’ has done; surely the man
The concept of tragic hero is very important in the construction of tragedy. It is the main cause of pity and fear. The tragic hero is a character between the two extremes; he is neither virtuous nor evil. At the same time, this character is better than the ordinary men or audience, he has some good qualities. Moreover, as a tragic hero, he is moving from happiness to misery by his downfall at the end. In fact, this downfall is caused by an error or a flaw in his character not by a vice or depravity. Another feature in the tragic hero is that he has good reputation and he is a man of prosperity. It can be said that Oedipus is a tragic hero because he has all the previous mentioned characteristics and the whole play is a classical application of this concept.
The people of Thebes worship Oedipus. Oedipus suffers from the consequences of his actions. Oedipus is unaware the things that he has done. Oedipus is seen as a tragic hero is evident in his lack of knowledge of himself, his desire to find the truth and because of the wisdom that he gains at the end of the story. Oedipus decides to find out who murdered the king not knowing that he is not only the murder but the king is his father and he has married his wife who is his mother. Even after Tiresias confronts him about these events, Oedipus does not want to believe it. Oedipus begins to seek the truth but he does not really want to know the truth about himself. According to Farahbakhsh (2013), “Oedipus’ life is replete with choices and decisions: he decides to believe the oracle of Apollo’s temple and escape from Corinth; he decides to kill Laius, whom he did not know was his real father; he decides to risk his life and face the Sphinx; he decides to marry Jocasta, whom it did not know was his mother, as reward for killing the Sphinx; and ironically he sets out to punish Laius murderer” (Farahbakhsh, 2013). Unfortunately these decisions are Oedipus’ destiny that he has to fulfill. “If we give ourselves up to a full sympathy with the hero, there is no question that Oedipus fulfills the function of a tragedy, and arouses fear and pity in the highest degree” (Barstow,
Oedipus was a good man. He solved the problem with the Sphinx, which is how he became king of Thebes in the first place. Oedipus was a religious and god-fearing man, believing in oracles and acting on them. Oedipus understood his people very well, to the extent that when he was that he ought to consul the oracle to figure out Apollo's wishes by the people. He is very ironic because he does not understand himself or realize anything that should seem plain and simple to him. Oedipus is very decisive, he sorts things out quickly and effectively, without much trouble.
Oedipus the King is an excellent example of Aristotle's theory of tragedy. The play has the perfect Aristotelian tragic plot consisting of paripeteia, anagnorisis and catastrophe; it has the perfect tragic character that suffers from happiness to misery due to hamartia (tragic flaw) and the play evokes pity and fear that produces the tragic effect, catharsis (a purging of emotion).
Elements of Tragedy in Oedipus Rex It is not the tragic subject matter of the text that is of primary interest but rather the manner in which the plot is developed. The story line progresses as if the reader is "unpeeling an onion. " The tale of King Oedipus is well known. An enraged Oedipus unknowingly slays his father (Laiusq, King of Thebes) and supplants him as monarch and as husband to his own mother (Queen Jocasta).
The consensus seems to fall along Other elements of literature that point to Oedipus being a tragic hero include cosmic irony, tragic flaws, and the tragic dilemma of the story. Being the intellect that he is, Oedipus slowly uncovers the whole truth and continuously fights the idea of his involvement. He wishes only to be the uncorrupted hero of Thebes, but is ultimately unable to achieve that moral clarity. One scholar describes this best when he says, “The pivotal theme of the tragedy is Oedipus' conflict between his desire to know himself and his opposing wish to cover up the truth that will bring disaster” (Zachrisson). Pairing the king’s motive to do only right and his tragic cosmic circumstances creates a sense of dismay for the audience.