Trafficking in Numbers: The Social Construction of Human Trafficking Data, by David Feingold

1519 Words4 Pages

In today’s world, numbers and statistics play an undeniable role in shaping our perception of the world, and quantification has become a universal tool to support claims and provide necessary evidence. Such cases are especially predominant in the fields of politics and media. People nowadays seem to automatically accept numbers and mindlessly repeat them with an unquestionable air of authority and validity, without considering the importance of examining the methodology behind them and the source that produced them. David Feingold makes this clear in his chapter titled Trafficking in Numbers: The Social Construction of Human Trafficking Data, as he states that the trafficking field is best described as one of “numerical certainty” and “statistical doubt” (p. 53), numbers in that field provide false precision and spurious authority while lacking any supporting proof. He offers examples that substantiate his arguments, and the suspect data behind them becomes clear when using the tools provided by Joel Best in his book Stat Spotting: A Field Guide to Identifying Dubious Data.

One straightforward example mentioned in Feingold’s chapter stated, “NGOs and journalists were claiming that there were 4 million sex workers in Thailand” (p. 51). When reading this, instant alarm bells start ringing, as many are awe struck by the seemingly unbelievable number of 4 million. As Best himself puts it, “If you had no idea things were that bad, they probably aren’t” (p. 111), which indicates the need to carefully examine this claim. First, we notice that 4 million is a “big round number” (p. 30), therefore indicating an exaggeration or guess, which begs the question: How was this number derived in the first place? This is a particularly importan...

... middle of paper ...

...hey do not question the information that is handed to them. This doesn’t mean that we should have a knee-jerk reaction whenever a number is brought up and automatically dismiss it, but we should rather approach it with a sense of informed skepticism. Many dedicated individuals like Joel Best have provided the general public with tools to effectively evaluate numbers in daily life and emphasized the significance of questioning how these numbers were socially constructed.

Works Cited

Best, Joel. Stat-Spotting: A Field Guide to Identifying Dubious Data. California: University of California Press, 2008.

Feingold, David. “Trafficking in Numbers: The Social Construction of Human Trafficking Data”. Sex, Drugs, and Body Counts: The Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Conflict, edited by Peter Andreas and Kelly Greenhill. New York: Cornell University Press, 2010.

Open Document