Tom Culley's The Art And Skill Of Cutting Corners

444 Words1 Page

Tom Culley, writer of “The art and skill of cutting corners” and Patrick Weidinger, director of environmental health and safety, disagree on the act on the act of “corner cutting” when starting and operating a business. In the article, “The art and skill of cutting corners”, Tom Culley believes that corner cutting is the most efficient way to a profit-making business. He believes that when starting off, precious time should not be wasted when attempting to make profit. Patrick Weidinger on the contrary believes that “cutting corners” play a part in the injuries or deaths or workers, in efforts of obtaining quick profit. Weidinger also believes that “corner cutting” leads to pollution of the environment as well as a violation of state and federal regulations. Both sides provided a strong case and I …show more content…

Culley goes on to say “if you made the gold, you made the gold-no matter if your office is a mess or your warehouse is a pigpen”. This is where he is wrong. I disagree with this statement, solely because of his comparison of a warehouse to a pig pen. When it comes to overall safety in the workplace, it is important that cleanliness and organization are a priority. IT is obvious that Culley is figuratively speaking; however, his stance on the cutting corners arises concerns for safety in the workplace environment. Culley also believes that there will be a “pause time” that can be used to make up a bit for the “corner cutting”. I think he is wrong by stating that because with profitable success, laziness can occur. By taking caution when operating a business, one can make sure to do so effectively and safely, which is what Weidinger believes. Patrick Weidinger, being a director of safety, had a serious disagreement with Culley. Widinger believes that “going for the gold” can be the reasoning for sickness, injury and death of employees while

Open Document