Tolkien's Beowulf: The Monsters And The Critics

530 Words2 Pages

In Tolkien’s Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics, he offers many points of criticism toward Beowulf. Furthermore, he also critiques those who have previously offered criticism for the poem. He largely praises the poem, claiming that most of its beauty is lost with readers’ interpretations, namely their considering it more of a piece of history than the amazing piece of art that it is. In his own words, Tolkien states that “Beowulf is not an actual picture of historic Denmark or Geatland or Sweden about A.D. 500. But it is (if with certain minor defects) on a general view of a self­ consistent picture, a construction bearing clearly the marks of design and thought” (Tolkien). Additionally, Tolkien disagrees with other critics on the idea that Beowulf fighting enemies based in fantasy detracting from his many heroic deeds. He says that “it would have been preposterous, if the poet had recounted Beowulf’s rise to fame in a ‘typical’ or ‘commonplace’ war in Frisia, and then ended him with a dragon” (Tolkien). …show more content…

The difference between an epic and an elegy being that an epic is a narrative poem, usually very long, that tells the story of a larger-than-life hero performing incredible feats of strength and valor through involvement of the supernatural. On the other side of this coin, an elegy bares resemblance to the more commonly known eulogy, involving a lament, in which the poet show grief and sorrow, followed by praise for the newly dead, ultimately ending with a great deal of solace. He explains that the majority of the poem, “its first 3,136 lines,” (Tolkien) are simply an extended lead up to the lines in which Beowulf’s funeral is prepared which read “the Geat people built a pyre for Beowulf, stacked and decked it until it stood four-square”

More about Tolkien's Beowulf: The Monsters And The Critics

Open Document