To What Extent Did the Government Adhere to the Principles of Laissez Faire from 1865 to 1900

1744 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Laissez faire policy

Laissez faire, meaning "let them do," is a governmental policy i which there is little government intervention. A french philosopher and the finance minister under King Louis XIV's reign, Jean Baptiste Colbert is said to be the first person to disseminate the principles of laissez faire.
From 1865 to 1900, the federal government of the United States moderately adopted the laissez faire system. At first, the government did practice laissez faire for it did little except its necessary duties. However, by the 1870's it was violating laissez faire little by little with the small restrictions on railroads and companies. As time progressed, the federal government abandoned laissez faire, for it passed the Interstate Commerce Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Many Industrialists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries endorsed the laissez faire system, for the lack of government control that it stood for allowed industrialists to manipulate industry and gain power without any opposition. Amasa Walker summarized their thoughts, regarding government, with the sentence, "Economically, it will ever remain true, that the government is best which governs least." In addition, Daniel Knowlton stated, "It is better always to leave individual enterprise to do most that is to be done in the country." For one, big business owners organized trusts by joining with other companies to form monopolies. Without competition or governmental interference, monopolists could ultimately control the production, transportation, and distribution of a consolidation. In 1892, James B. Weaver described the trust system in A Call to Action: An Interpretation of the Great Uprising. Its Source and Causes. He stated:
It is clear that trusts are contrary to public ...

... middle of paper ...

...erfere with anything other than "unlawful combinations." He also explained, "It is the right of every man to work, labor, and produce in any lawful vocation and to transport his production on equal terms and conditions and under like circumstances. This is industrial liberty and lies at the foundation of the equality of all rights and privileges. . . ." In other words, it is right for government to intervene with the affairs of businesses to stop corruption and better the United States rather than allow wealthy industrialists to take away people's freedom.
Much controversy came with the various acts. Some believed government was wholly violating laissez faire, while others believed that government maintained a good balance. However, although government did enact laissez faire at the beginning of the time frame (1865-1900), it ultimately abandoned it by the 1900's.

Show More
Related

  • New Deal impact on society

    1623 Words  | 4 Pages

    Because the economy was unstable, Franklin Roosevelt imposed many programs to boost the economy both helping and hindering American citizens through banking and financial reformation with government regulation. After declaring the “bank holiday,” Roosevelt created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in order to put confidence back in the citizens and their ability to trust banks to keep their money. By also separating commercial banks from investment banks, the government was trying to keep the flow of money uniform. This idea is radical in form because of the new government imposed restrictions, and conservatives may argue this movement shows signs of socialism. Many people saw implications that free enterprise was disappearing; Herbert Hoover specifically mentions in his Anti-New Deal Campaign speech that he proposes to “amend the tax laws so as not to defeat free men and free enterprise.” The threat to free enterprise challenged the American economy because u...

    Read More

  • 19th Century's Industrialists: Robber Barons or Industrial Statesmen?

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...interpretations of their assumption of millions of dollars. Due to their appropriation of godlike fortunes, and numerous contributions to American society, they simultaneously displayed qualities of both aforementioned labels. Therefore, whether it be Vanderbilt’s greed, Rockefeller’s philanthropy, or Carnegie’s social Darwinist world view, such men were, quite unarguably, concurrently forces of immense good and evil: building up the modern American economy, through monopolistic trusts and exploitative measures, all the while developing unprecedented affluence. Simply, the captains of late 19th century industry were neither wholly “robber barons” or “industrial statesmen”, but rather both, as they proved to be indifferent to their “lesser man” in their quests for profit, while also helping to organize industry and ultimately, greatly improve modern American society.

    Read More

  • Michael Sandel: An Analysis Of Democracy's Discontent

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    First, the “decentralization” vision was popularized by Louis Brandeis. It advocates deindustrialization on the grounds that it limits self-government among citizens. This makes the same republican virtue arguments that Sandel himself makes. Government should not regulate trusts for the benefit of workers or consumers. Rather, the state should ban monopolies and break up trusts in order to promote competition among firms. It is important that businesses be local and independent in order to preserve the people’s democratic control over the government.

    Read More

  • American Equality in Pay Issues

    1788 Words  | 4 Pages

    1932 - Federal Economic Act passes to ban wives of federal employees from holding government positions. It also declares that women with employed husbands

    Read More

  • New Freedom Vs. New Nationalism

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Theodore Roosevelt's opinion, trusts are inevitable. As said in his 1910 "New Nationalism" speech, "There can be no effective control of corporation while their political activity remains. To put an end it will be neither a short nor an easy task, but it can be done". Woodrow Wilson had a somewhat different view on how trusts react in our society. He believes that trusts are natural but not inevitable. Wilson states in his speech in 1912 that trusts are manmade and believes they're intolerable. "I am not willing to be under the patronage of the trusts, no matter how providential a government presides over the process of their control of my life", Wilson exclaims during a campaign speech. He didn't care how much governmental control they were under and he would like to do anything in his power to stop them completely from taking over the industries.

    Read More

  • Theodore Roosevelt

    1493 Words  | 3 Pages

    During his first term as President, Roosevelt put one of his most progressive policies into effect. This policy dealt with labor and anti-trusts. During the early part of the twentieth century the large businesses of the day would combine to form powerful monopolies that kept a strangle hold on all the competition. These trusts, Roosevelt believed, “…have on a whole done great good to our people … but combination and concentration should be, not prohibited, but supervised and, within reasonable limits, controlled.” (World Book, Vol. 16, Pg. 468) In 1902 the United States government, under the influence of President Roosev...

    Read More

  • Religious Freedom Restoration Act

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    In other words, the government did not have to have a reason to impose laws

    Read More

  • The Progressive Movement In The Early Twentieth Century

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the Progressive Era, the Federal Government passed a great deal of legislation in efforts to ensure a safer and more efficient nation. The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 modified and strengthened previous policies passed in the Sherman

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The 1930s And 1960s

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    The President and Congress actually passed and enacted significant reform, ultimately resulting into facing the grave time of suffering. Although the era of do nothing Republicanism has been in the 1920s, the economy collapse and everything took a turn for the worst. Starting in 1933, such legislation as banking and stock market reform, welfare relief, Social Security, aide and funds for farmers, such as the AAA passed. Labor powers were given by The Wagner Act.

    Read More

  • Federalism

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    During Reconstruction the war argument over the use of federal power erupted in violence against newly enfranchised blacks and Republican government in the South .In the late nineteenth century the federal government retreated from its temporary expansion of power in saving the Union and trying to remake the South. Whether in tolerating state created racial segregation or striking down federal efforts to regulate the new industrial order, the federal courts limited federal authority in many areas of public life. At the beginning of the twentieth century progressive reformers wanted to enlarge the role of the federal government and solve glaring economic and social problems. With mixed success they sought federal legislation to regulate the workplace, protect labor unions, and promote “moral improvement.” During the 1930s the new deal redefined federalism and saved the economy by recognizing federal responsibility over many areas of public and private activity that previously had been unregulated or solely the purview of the states,

    Read More

  • The Pros and Cons of Roosevelt's New Deal

    1214 Words  | 3 Pages

    The era of the Great Depression was by far the worst shape the United States had ever been in, both economically and physically. Franklin Roosevelt was elected in 1932 and began to bring relief with his New Deal. In his first 100 days as President, sixteen pieces of legislation were passed by Congress, the most to be passed in a short amount of time. Roosevelt was re-elected twice, and quickly gained the trust of the American people. Many of the New Deal policies helped the United States economy greatly, but some did not. One particularly contradictory act was the Agricultural Adjustment Act, which was later declared unconstitutional by Congress. Many things also stayed very consistent in the New Deal. For example, the Civilian Conservation Corps, and Social Security, since Americans were looking for any help they could get, these acts weren't seen as a detrimental at first. Overall, Roosevelt's New Deal was a success, but it also hit its stumbling points.

    Read More

  • The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen

    1183 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ion of the Right of Man and the Citizen”, Republic of France, 26 August 1789

    Read More

  • Agrarian Discontent in the Late Nineteenth Century

    1288 Words  | 3 Pages

    Near the end of the nineteenth century, business began to centralize, leading to the rise of monopolies and trusts. Falling prices, along with the need for better efficiency in industry, led to the rise of companies, the Carnegie Steel and Standard Oil company being a significant one. The rise of these monopolies and trusts concerned many farmers, for they felt that the disappearance of competition would lead to abnormaly unreasonable price raises that would hurt consumers and ultimately themselves. James B. Weaver, the Populist party's presidential candidate in the 1892 election, summed up the feelings of the many American Farmers of the period in his work, A Call to Action: An Interpretation of the Great Uprising [Document F]. His interpretations of the feelings of farmers during that time were head on, but the truth is that the facts refute many of Weaver's charges against the monopolies. While it is true that many used questionable methods to achieve their monopoly, there were also other businessmen out there that were not aiming to crush out the competition. In fact, John D. Rockefeller, head of Standard Oil and a very influential and powerful man of that time, competed ardently to not crush out his competitors but to persuade then to join Standard Oil and share the business so all could profit.

    Read More

  • The New Deal Reforms

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    A competitive market makes a country stronger but without regulation it can threaten the country’s democracy. The President criticized the large corporations for “keeping prices artificially high and failing to increase workers’ purchasing power”(Liberty 863). Franklin D Roosevelt realized large corporations who gained monopolies were gaining immense influence on matter’s concerning government and the daily lives of American citizens. The first New Deal reforms were introduced, not to dismantle large industries but to control them in such a manner that they could never challenge the democratic government. Large corporations took advantage of the liberty given to them prior to the crash by exploiting the profits in payoffs or bribes. The businesses gained influence in government by funding election campaigns of tainted politicians who would in return be blinded of the corruption spread by the untouchable corporations to expand their profit margins.

    Read More

  • Socialism - The Best Economic System

    1465 Words  | 3 Pages

    Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens.

    Read More

More about To What Extent Did the Government Adhere to the Principles of Laissez Faire from 1865 to 1900

Open Document