Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues for organ donation
Debate on organ donation
Ethical issues for organ donation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues for organ donation
Based on The Meat Market, by Alex Tabarrok (607), The Case for Mandatory Organ Donation, by Scott Carney (614), Yes, Let’s Pay for Organs, by Charles Krauthammer (620), and The Surgery Was Simple; the Process Is Another Story, by Virginia Postrel (625). Should we pay for organs? We can solve our problems by paying for organs. By paying for organs, donors are saving lives, and reducing the organ shortage. First, Donating saves those in need. Anyone can donate, dead or alive. Although donating from the dead helps, if living people were to donate the amount of lives saved would increase. “You don’t have to be dead to give someone a kidney, you just have to be healthy and willing” (Postrel 626). Like donating a kidney, other organs can be donated while alive. After being surgically worked on, our organs are able to function normally. While giving a part of us to a patient in need, we help them gain organ functionality and save their lives. Moreover, the idea of donating is more conceivable for all when given a reasonable amount of compensation. Compensation for donation may sway some (such as the poor), but for those who don’t need money, a larger more reasonable sum should do. “[Paying for organs may] address the rich/poor concern: after all, $3,000 is real money, even for bankers and lawyers” (Krauthammer 621). By addressing both the poor and the rich, more lives are be saved as donors come from both parties, and if the rich donate surely the middle class will donate. Second, by paying for organs, donors reduce the shortage on organs. People would be inclined to donate if they were being paid. Many problems can be solved by money, and according to Tabarrok, so can the organ shortage, “The Iranian system and the black market dem... ... middle of paper ... ...fe. Works Cited Carney, Scott. “The Case for Mandatory Organ Donation.” 2007. Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. 12th ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford, 2012. 614-17. Print. Krauthammer, Charles. “Yes, Let's Pay for Organs.” Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. 12th ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford, 2012. 620-22. Print. Postrel, Virginia. “The Surgery Was Simple; the Process Is Another Story.” 2006. Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. 12th ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford, 2012. 625-27. Print. Tabarrok, Alex. “The Meat Market.” 2010. Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. 12th ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford, 2012. 607-11. Print.
The Stases and Other Rhetorical Concepts from Introduction to Academic Writing. N.p.: n.p., n.d. PDF.
In her article, Satel criticizes the current methods governing organ sharing in the United States, and suggests that the government should encourage organ donation, whether it was by providing financial incentives or other compensatory means to the public. Furthermore, the author briefly suggests that the European “presumed consent” system for organ donation might remedy this shortage of organs if implicated in the States.
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
The impact and effectiveness of using proper rhetoric was a strategy of “good” writing that I was not aware of until my senior year of high school. While taking AP Language and Composition my junior year, my fellow students and I believed that we had survived countless essay workshop activities and writing assignments with emphasis on word choices, grammatical structure, syntax, punctuation and spelling. By the time we had entered AP Literature our senior year, we felt we could achieve success; we already knew how to write in the correct format and structur...
McNeil, Hayden. The Anteater's Guide to Writing & Rhetoric. Irvine: Composition Program, Department of English, UC Irvine, 2014. Print.
11th ed. By Kelly J. Mays. New York: W W Norton &, 2013. 551-57. Print.
People in support of organ transplantation argue the cost/benefit ration and have determined their arguing points to be these: Social Responsibility, Improves the Quality of Life, alleviation of familial grief, encourages hope to live, lessens the cost of patient care, improves research and research methods. The opposing side offers an alternative view, offering these augment points: Risk of complication during and after surgery, degradation of health in the long run, adverse physiological effect on donor’s family, financial burden, objections based on religious belief, unethical trade and harvesting of human organs, and finally, the donor has no rights to choose the recipient.
of the book. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print. The. Madaras, Larry, and James M. Sorelle.
The process of organ donation is essential to the institution of health for it to continue to function smoothly and to provide the protection and safety it was designed to create. Organ donation also has many latent functions such as creating jobs for the surgeons and doctors.
Shteyngart, Gary. “Sixty-Nine Cent.” Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. Eds. Laurie G. Kirszner and Steven R. Mandell. 11th edition. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010 Boston, 102-105. Print.
Thesis: While driving on the highway recently, I saw a bumper sticker which read: “Please Don't Take Your Organs to Heaven, Heaven Knows That We Need Them Here” Approximately 7,000 Americans die annually while awaiting an organ transplant. In other countries of the world thousands more whose lives could be extended or transformed through transplants lost their lives because of unavailable organs. The waiting list is ever growing and the list of those willing to donate seems to be shrinking. This can be attributed to lack of motivation and knowledge among the prospective donors. According to a research done by the World Health Organization (WHO) on Kidney transplant, only one in ten people in need of a new kidney, manages to get one. The gap between supply and demand for organs has created a black market for body parts which has led to abuse of human life especially in third world countries. This high demand has led people to scour the globe to procure the organs they or their loved ones need and unscrupulous intermediaries offer help. There is a need to compensate those who are willing donate if this wide gap has to be bridged.
...o rules out medical and religious ethics. Many people are not willing to donate an organ if they do not receive any personal gain to it. However, many more people would be willing to donate if in turn they could save the life of a family member.
While people who offer parts of their bodies to others after death may not necessarily give their families much financial comfort, those who volunteer their bodies to medical schools for practice and research are typically able to cut down their funeral expenses significantly (Wellington & Sayre, 2011). However, Wellington and Sayre (2011) theorize that the decrease in entombment prices may also depreciate the number of individual parts donations, but their studies reveal no support to this assumption. Even if the donations of cadavers did overpower those of separate organs, these bodies would allow medical students to gain more information about unfamiliar diseases that would help eliminate the time and money that a patient would spend on futile methods of treatment (Wellington & Sayre, 2011; Minz, Kashyap, & Udgiri, 2003). Furthermore, live donors are able to help others without the subjection to financial burden (Wellington & Sayre, 2011). While profits from organ donations are morally wrong in the eyes of humanity and illegal due to the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, many states enable live donors to gain thousands of dollars in compensation on their tax returns and recruit state workers with up to a month of reimbursement while they are in recovery (Wellington & Sayre, 2011). Ultimately, the ethical concerns that involve the monetary motivations for organ donations still favor society as a whole because it allows patients with fatal illnesses to receive the mandatory procedures to save their
Organ donations are crucial for people in emergency situations. For years organ donations have saved the lives of millions. The problem with people needing organs is that there are not enough organs to be supplied to everyone who needs it. There are many people who die because they are not able to obtain lifesaving organs. The need for organs exceeds the supply given. Thus, leading me to ask this essential question, “Should organ donation be a part of the market?” To support this question I have prepared three supportive claims, but since my answer is no my reasons will revolve around this argument. First, I will state why I do not agree with such a thing, and then I will support my claim by stating why it is so bad, and to end my paper I will state what place(s) legalizes trade.
A transplanted kidney can last a person their whole lifetime yet in the greatest country of the world, the government bans the selling of organs. This leads to thousands of citizens desperate to find a cure for themselves or a loved one. A solution to reduce our supply and demand gap would be to pay our donors. By paying our donors, this would increase the supply of kidneys tremendously. People living in extreme poverty are willing to put so much on the line for money. People in third world countries are accepting as little as $1,000 for a kidney just so they can supply their family with some food and necessities. This black market of organ trading needs to be stopped but we should not ask a patient to accept death easily. If organ sales did become legalized it would need to be highly regulated. Some people in less fortunate countries are only left to sell their organs on the black market. Why not build a regulated system that compensates people fairly and provides them with safety? As unpleasant as it seems to commodify organs, the current situation is simply too tragic not to change something. If coordinated properly, it could simultaneously satisfy the needs of wealthy countries with long waiting lists and poorer countries with overwhelming poverty. In the 1990s, after years of war and economic slumps, the country, Iran decided to compensate donors by paying them for