To Kill A Mockingbird Rhetorical Analysis

820 Words2 Pages

The Powerless Individual Multitudinous amounts of people, like small groups of ants within a colony gathered in many different cities in the United States. According to a New York Times article, fervent protests broke out in many urban areas such as, “New York, Boston, Chicago, Pittsburgh and Washington D.C” (Southall). A result of the outrageous outcome of the case that released a white police officer, Daniel Pantaleo, who choked a black man to death, Eric Garner, despite his innocence and desperate gasps of plea and aid was immense passion towards this course of action. In To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee the myopic views of the people of Maycomb act as a concrete wall so solidified that it is almost impossible for Atticus a humble yet …show more content…

When Jem asks Atticus to change the law in Montgomery, Atticus replies, “You’d be surprised how hard that’d be. I won’t live to see the law changed, and if you see it you’ll be an old man” (Lee 220). Atticus believes that changing society’s view can prove too hard for one man to handle, especially with such a short time window. Change progresses slowly and requires the efforts of multiple people, regardless of the differences in the views of those people in order to achieve it. Slow change, achieved due to the differences in the views of these individuals, can either persuade a group of people to join or stray away from the view being presented. In a similar manner, when Jem talks to Calpurnia about the result of the trial, Calpurnia says, “Atticus Finch won’t win, he can’t win, but he’s the only man in these parts who can keep a jury out so long on a case like this…it’s just a baby-step but it’s a step” (Lee 216). Calpurnia discusses with Jem about how Atticus could elucidate some truth to the court even if it wasn’t enough to acquit Tom Robinson. Atticus was able to “get the stone rolling”, in other words, start to change the views of the people in society, but only through the efforts of multiple people and all the similar cases before him, made Atticus able to progress as far as he did. …show more content…

During the court trial when Atticus proves Bob Ewell’s status as a left-handed man, “nothing Atticus asked him after that shook him” (Lee 178). Despite the outcome of the case, Bob Ewell proves the only reasonable and logical culprit in the case due to his left-handedness which starts to lift the veil of prejudice that the society had. With the help of Bob Ewell’s stubbornness to admit to Atticus’s claim, Atticus could show society the truth and the wrongness of their ways. In a similar manner, when Bob Ewell follows Helen Robinson around town Link Deas notices Bob’s behavior and retorts, “…if I hear one more peep outa my girl Helen about not bein’ able to walk this road I’ll have you in jail before sundown” (Lee 249). The antagonistic behavior that Bob Ewell still shows after winning the unfair court trial reveals his true colors and intentions of reaping the benefits of a corrupted jury. This course of action places him in a spot where people like Link Deas are starting to step up against people who share the same values or opinions as Bob

Open Document