Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial discrimination effect on society
Comparison of books and movies
Movie and novel comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial discrimination effect on society
To Film A Mockingbird
“Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They both are fruit, but taste completely different.” Does this quote by Stephen King have it right when comparing the timeless novel, To Kill A Mockingbird with the Robert Mulligan film version? This touching book is about the protagonist, Scout, retelling the story of her childhood. Her youth was lived in Maycomb, Alabama in the 1930’s. At this time, there was still much segregation in the South and it affected how she grew up. To Kill A Mockingbird is by Harper Lee, and the director of the movie was Robert Mulligan. Knowing that there were some scenes, which provided important themes and plots, the director made it different than in the book. There were some similarities, but also many differences that impacted the novel, such as a radical change in scenes and less in depth descriptions of the characters.
…show more content…
Inside the book, we learned that most black people could not read. Also, it was showing that most of the black people were accepting of Jem and Scout. A man, Zeebo, who arose from the crowd said, “we’re mighty glad to have you all here. Don’t pay no ‘tention to Lula, she contentious because Reverend Sykes threatened to church her” (Lee 159). Out of all the people attending the black church at that time, Lula was the only person who was against Jem and Scout attending the black church with Calpurnia. Contrary to the book, this section was left out of the movie. It is different because there is not a church scene in the movie. Because of the film not showing us about the home life of Calpurnia, a certain bridge is lost that connects the black people with Jem and Scout. Without this scene, viewers of the movie would not realize how strong the connection is between the African-Americans, and Jem and
There are many differences between the book; To Kill a Mockingbird and the movie. Some differences are easy to spot and some aren’t. Many things that are in the book aren’t in the movie. Many of these things you don’t need, but are crucial to the plot of the book. Movies and books have differences and similarities, but many things in books MUST be included in the movie.
1. The movie To Kill A Mockingbird was based on Harper Lee 's Pulitzer Prize winning novel To Kill A Mockingbird. The movie was released in the United States on March 16, 1963. Many of the characters in this movie are relevant such as Boo Radley, Tom Robinson, Jem, Bob Ewell, and Calpurnia; however, this movie is a representation of what was seen in the deep south during the depression era through the eyes of a six year old girl named Scout. Because it is a narrative, Scout makes one of two primary characters. Scout 's father, Atticus Finch, is the other primary character; he is the morally righteous lawyer that decides to defend a colored man who is being accused of raping a white girl.
To Kill a Mockingbird is a 1962 American film, based on the novel of the same name by Harper Lee. To Kill a Mockingbird is a classic film about racial injustice, the loss of innocence and what it was like to live in the deep south during the depression era. When I watched To Kill a Mockingbird, I had many things I like about the movie and a few things I wish that could have been differently.
To begin with, there are many similarities between the book and movie To Kill A Mockingbird. For example, Tom Robinson died in an attempt to escape from prison in both the book and the movie. In my opinion Tom's death was crucial to the original story, and I believe the movie would have been seen as over-sentimental if the scriptwriters had let him live. Another important similarity between the book and movie, is the mutual fascination between Arthur Radley and the children. Arthur, or Boo as the children called him, left them gifts such as dolls, a watch, and chewing gum in the hollow of a tree in his yard. The children made expeditions to the Radley house to look in the window just so they could catch a glimpse of Boo Radley. I believe this captivation was important to the story line because it was the main foundation of the children's imagination. A big part of the story was imagining Boo to be some kind of freak that came out at night to eat cats and squirrels. An additional similarity between the book and movie is the respect showed to Atticus by the African American community of Maycomb. They respected him for his courage, which by his definition meant, "It's when you know you're licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do."(112). I think the mutual respect between the African Americans and Atticus was important not only to Atticus, but also to his children. Their father and the sad story and memories of Tom Robinson taught them the wrongs of racism. I think if the movie producers had taken out the good relationship between Atticus and the African Americans, it would be taking away one of the most important themes of the story. There are many other significant similarities between the book and the movie.
First of all, contrasting the book, the movie never shows or hints to the scene where Jem and Scout go to Calpurnia’s church with her. It can be seen that the respect directed at the Finches by the blacks grows throughout the story as Atticus is defending Tom Robinson, a black man. However, it is also made known that not every black person has respect for the Finches. The importance of the church scene shows both of these statements to be true as many people in Calpurnia’s church don’t mind having Jem and Scout, white children, around; they even welcome them. The other side of the coin is shown when Calpurnia has to defend the children when she gets into a bout with Lula while having Jem and Scout at the church. It also seems as though some characters have been left out of introduction such as Reverend Sykes, who is the preacher at Calpurnia’s church. The director of the movie rejected this scene since there is an alternative instance of black people d...
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
Jem and Scout are going to Calpurnia’s First Purchase church for the first time. Jem and Scout are the children of Atticus, a prominent white lawyer in Maycomb, and Calpurnia is their African American cook and nanny. Scout, the narrator, is describing her less-than-flattering view
To Kill a Mockingbird, written by Harper Lee, then later adapted into a black and white picture film in 1962. The story portrays a young girl's experience during the Great Depression within a racist, segregated society. The texts, also centres around the young girl’s struggles with growing up, as she not only tries to understand and process the trial, but also wrestles with the expectations people have of her. Both versions of text are representations of the concept of innocence through the embodiment of Jean Louise ‘Scout’ Finch and Arthur Radley (Boo): In the film the audience is mainly exposed to the representation of Jem’s innocence rather than the depiction of Scout, whereas, in the novel she is portrayed as a ‘slow coming child’. This
It;s our church, ain’t it, Miss Cal?” There is an invisible line between blacks and whites, and when someone crosses the line they are criticised by the rest`. This goes back to the point where the hidden rule is that blacks and whites should not interact. When Cal bring Scout and Jem to the church they feel uncomfortable and unwanted by the rest of the black community, or more specifically Lulu. This shows that not only blacks are affected by the
During the book Scout and Jem are at an age were people around them greatly affect their thoughts, views and ideas about the world. Although Atticus tried to raise them to treat Negroes as equals, people around them affected their views on them. A good example is when Dill questioned the seemingly rude way which Mr. Gilmer treated Tom Robinson. Scout replied by saying, "…after all he's just a Negro." (Lee 201). She believes it to be acceptable. This is not something her father put in her head but people in her town. The same also happens in the black community. When Atticus asks Calpurnia to watch his children for him while he is out, Calpurnia accepts and takes the children with her to church, a church for black people. When she arrives with the children, they are greeted kindly except by a few people. These people use the same reason as in the last example as to why they should not be there, because they are white.
In this scene, a Mad Rabid dog, named Tim Johnson, comes through the streets of a the town of Maycomb.
Little by little Jem, Scout, and Dill get exposed to the real world; changing their perspective and their attitude towards people and subjects. This event focuses on Scout and Jem, Atticus is away and Calpurnia decides to take them to her church. While they are at the church Jem and Scout notice, Calpurnia talks a different way to negros than to whites. “‘Cal,’ I asked, “why do you talk niggertalk to the—to your folks when you know it’s not right?” ‘Well, in the first place I’m black—’ ‘That doesn’t mean you hafta talk that way when you know better,’ said Jem. Calpurnia tilted her hat and scratched her head, then pressed her hat down carefully over her ears. ‘It’s right hard to say,’ she said. ‘Suppose you and Scout talked colored-folks’ talk at home it’d be out of place, wouldn’t it? Now what if I talked white-folks’ talk at church, and with my neighbors? They’d think I was puttin‘ on airs to beat Moses.’ ‘But Cal, you know better,’ I said. ‘It’s not necessary to tell all you know. It’s not ladylike—in the second place, folks don’t like to have somebody around knowin‘ more than they do. It aggravates ’em. You’re not gonna change any of them by talkin‘ right, they’ve got to want to learn themselves, and when they don’t want to learn there’s nothing you can do but keep your mouth shut or talk their language.’” (167) Calpurnia
Alluring and beguiling, the themes and characters, sentence after sentence, flourish and blossom, creating a truly enchanting story. After being released into the world, To Kill a Mockingbird sincerely stole the show, wrestling with the hearts of many. With almost every beautiful novel, there is a beautiful movie to go along with it, and To Kill a Mockingbird is no exception to this statement. But, are there the same themes and key parts of the storyline included? Taking place in the 1930’s in the small county of Maycomb, Alabama, To Kill a Mockingbird shows the hardships of the minorities, as well as the views of children growing up during this certain time period, and highlights the differentiation of different people.
pg. 251-252). Besides discrimination and white privilege, gender discrimination also plays a role in this novel/film. Jem and Scout have grown up without a mother, and have a black house servant, Calpurnia, stand as a mother figure even though she and Scout do not get along. Throughout the movie, Scout is portrayed as not wanting to wear dresses and not acting “ladylike” as Calpurnia says.
Not many African Americans had the opportunity to be involved in the process of major productions. Because racism in To Kill a Mockingbird, written by Harper Lee, is underplayed in the film, it shows society’s unwillingness to address the issues even during the Civil Rights Movement. The movie focuses more on Tom Robinson’s case itself, than the social caste issues with the citizens of Maycomb (Dave). The movie was made in Hollywood during the the civil rights movement, which proves that the lack of racial issues addressed is intentional.