Title IX: Progress or Reverse Sexism?

1575 Words4 Pages

From the beginning of time men and women were not view as equals. Woman have fought time and time again to be viewed with the same standards as men. Title IX has helped sexism in education, and sports all across the United States, but could Title IX be supporting woman more than men? Sexisms has switched lanes and is now targeting men. Through World War II woman took the jobs of men in the military, in 1919 woman got the right to vote, in 1900 woman got their to participate in their first Olympic Games. As time progresses women rights blossom. Title IX has helped this movement grow. Title IX of the Education of the Amendments act of 1972 is a federal law and it states “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded …show more content…

Department of Education. The National Wrestling Coaches Association stood together to try to save Bucknell Wrestling, Marquette Wrestling Club, Yale Wrestling Association, and College Sports Council. Through a series of investigation they concluded that Bucknell limited the ability of mens sports all together, which goes against the Title IX laws. They did this by eliminating mens athletics all together or limiting the amount of participants. One short month after the suit the National Women’s Law Center filled a friend-of-the-court brief behalf of the American Association of University Women, American Volleyball Coaches Association, National Women’s Lacrosse Coaches Association, National Fastpitch Softball Coaches Association, Women’s Basketball Coaches Association, and Women’s Sports Foundation. A friend of the court brief is someone who has strong views or information in the leading matter. The Nation Women’s Law Center urged the court to reject the case due to Title IX laws that have been active sense 1975. They are all supporters of equal opportunities of both genders in sports and education. The Department of Education filled a motion to dismiss the claims because the plaintiffs lack to bring their claims under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The case was then dismissed in June of 2003. Soon after this case was dismissed in came into question that the matter was sexist. …show more content…

This may come of shock to you but women get payed more then men when they are managers and supervisors of construction workers. Painting is a job typically down by men, only three percent of painters are women, but a study shows that women get paid more for the same amount of work. Aircraft, vehicle and mobile equipment mechanics are another job that women’s pay flourishes, but once again they only hold about three percent of the

Open Document