Ti Rawls: The Two Principles Of Justice

1336 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Relevance of john rawls theory of justice

Essay Question: What two principles of justice does Rawls believe would be chosen in the original position (when deciding the issue of distributive justice within states)? Are these good choices? Critically discuss with reference ti Rawls’ own reasoning for the two principles.
Rawls believes that during his time, he came up with two principles of justice, which could of helped solve the problem of distributive justice, but utilising a variant of the social contract. The theory which resulted in this, is now known as the “justice as fairness” from which Rawls derives his two core principles from: the liberty principle and the difference principle, which will furthermore be explained below.
Several key concepts will be mentioned throughout: Two of the most important principles are the two which rawls discovered, the two principles of justice:
(1) “Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others” the second principle is split into two;
(2) “They are to be the greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society, consistent with the just saving principle (the difference principle)
(2a) “Offices and positions must be open to everyone under conditions of fair equality and opportunity”
The original position”… is a hypothetical situation in which the future members of a society meet and agree upon the general political principles to govern their society The ‘veil of ignorance’ also features within the original position; the ‘veil of ignorance’ is that “no one knows what their position is going to be within society, in fact, they know no personal information about themselves (including the life plan/values they are going to have)” within the veil of ignoranc...

... middle of paper ...

...f which merit is accounted. It may be concept that this equality than the differences principle, because big social and economic inequalities exist, even when they are to the benefit of the worst off, will assist to seriously impair the values of the political liberties and many shares towards fair equality of opportunity.
From what is above, we can see that the principles of maximin and egalitarianism both have their good and their points, in terms of relating it to Rawls theory of justice, but from this we can see that these two principles both best relate to the difference principle, which in theory, has been deemed the theory to go by, despite all the criticism from other philosophers, then from what has been read and written about it, then when applying criticisms to the theory, then this could be well be bought into our society, and therefore applied more.

Show More
Related

  • Rudy Giuliani's Role In The Aftermath

    768 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the American founding fathers etched the first words into the Constitution, they formulated the timeless document around three basic principles: logos, ethos, and pathos. Essentially, the Framers envisioned a society and country where free speech allows people to utilize these core fundamental principles as a symbol of American freedom following secession from the British. In fact, these core principles were first operated in a political scheme by the Athenians and Romans. But over many centuries, these principles finally gained recognition in a revolutionary setting when they were first employed by social theorists such as John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Voltaire. Following the Humanist Revolution, these same principles

    Read More

  • John Rawls and the Social Contract

    3640 Words  | 8 Pages

    At the outset it should be noted, “the origina l position is not, of course, thought of as an actual historical state of affairs, mu...

    Read More

  • Concepts that Illustrate the Founding Principles of America

    1157 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are several instituting concepts that for me illustrate the founding principles of America and the hopeful vision of the future of this country. There are those that stood out for me during my research for this assignment and resonated with my feelings and understanding of the country at large. First and foremost is Life Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness; this sentiment is to me the very cornerstone of the hope of America’s inception. Given this principles self explanatory nature I will concentrate on the other founding concepts that have meaning to me. First of these would be the thought of benefiting from one’s own hard work, second is the inalienable rights of man, and lastly the concept of the least possible government being the best.

    Read More

  • John Rawls on Justice

    1425 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Rawls was a man who played an influential role in shaping political thought in the late 20th century. Rawls is accredited for writing two major contributions that has helped influence political ideology of those even today. His first piece was published in 1971, A Theory of Justice, which argues his belief of justice on the domestic level and also that reconciliation between liberty and equality must occur in order to have a just society . Rawls’s belief of what justice should be is extremely controversial, and helped put Rawls on the map. Later, after Rawls gained a reliable reputation he published another piece called, Law of the Peoples, which was his application of justice towards international affairs and what he believes America’s Foreign Policy should emulate. In this I will describe both of his works and then throughout I will offer a brief critique on both A Theory of Justice and Law of the Peoples.

    Read More

  • On Utilitarianism

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill gives an account for the reasons one must abide by the principles of Utilitarianism. Also referred to as the Greatest-happiness Principle, this doctrine promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. More specifically, Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, holding that the right act is that which yields the greatest net utility, or "the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain", for all individuals affected by said act (Joyce, lecture notes from 03/30).

    Read More

  • John Rawls's Theory Of Social Justice

    1529 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rawls theory of justice is idealistic because the original position cannot be forced upon individuals in the real world, instead individuals of the real world must put themselves into the original position. With so many self-interested human beings in our world, a society that completely honored the rights of their brethren is difficult to imagine, but events in our history when the disadvantages of the oppressed were finally fully realized by the privileged have proved that not only is altruism natural to us but a society who honors it will succeed. As King exemplified in his freedom marches, when people realize faults in society they convene and unify to expel them and usually find themselves better off as a whole. A reality where the democratically elected president of America is of color would be just another fantasy in 1956. However now, not only have we begun settling matters of civil rights, but areas of disparity in the lives of women, the disabled, the LGBTQI community and immigrants across the country. So as I reap from the benefits of that movement, I myself cannot help but strive to attain those opportunities that I could never have dreamed of 80 years ago and live a life that supports those around me so that as society can improve as a whole. Suppression in any part of society from things such as a gendered wage gap or segregation based on race hold society back. Rawls theory of justice sets society free from the weight of the disadvantaged and gives each person the greatest chance to evolve not just as individuals but as part of an evolving

    Read More

  • Rawls Theory Of Justice

    3346 Words  | 7 Pages

    Why is it that a person has to offset his initial gain for the betterment of others? Rawls proposes this idea as the criterion for his second principle, the difference principle. What I argue however, is that the difference principle proposes to remove inequality from society but fails in this endeavor due to retaining enough inequality to benefit the disadvantaged, leaving the principle defective in its nature. This will be the question analyzed in this essay where I will first explain the two principles proposed by Rawls as well as the lexical order or priority, which is a central feature within A Theory of Justice. I...

    Read More

  • Civil Liberties And Civil Rights

    1049 Words  | 3 Pages

    To conclude, I have covered the two main ideas that I wished to add to my constitution essay, along with one civil liberty that I had already addressed. I explained my reasoning as to why I had established the civil liberty of religious protection within my original paper, along with the reasons that I wished to add those of freedom of speech and the pursuit of happiness. All of this combined form a fuller picture of what I wish this country to be and how I wish for this country to opereate.

    Read More

  • John Rawls: “Original Position”

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rawls creates a hypothetical society, via a thought experiment known as the “Veil of Ignorance,” in which all that you knew of yourself is eliminated from your mind to allow you to come to a rational decision on how you would like your society to be organized. Rawls principle is that under a social contract what is right must be the same for everyone. The essence of Rawls' “veil of ignorance” is that it is designed to be a representation of persons purely in their capacity as free and equal moral persons. Out of this experiment Rawls provides us with two basic p...

    Read More

  • Theory Of Justice In John Rawls's Theory Of Justice

    2303 Words  | 5 Pages

    Since this principle aims to benefit the people who are in the worst off position, this creates a sense of equality, wherein the person who has the least, gets the most compensation, and in turn, the person with the most, receives the least; thus it balances out the inequality of income and wealth. This constant shift in balance will provide society with a way of moving forward, as people are able to shift up and down in ranks, and allow the entire community to grow in some way. The economic standing will always fluctuate depending on conditions, but the distribution of principles will remain

    Read More

  • John Rawls And Utilitarianism

    2028 Words  | 5 Pages

    The social contract theory of John Rawls challenges utilitarianism by pointing out the impracticality of the theory. Mainly, in a society of utilitarians, a citizens rights could be completely ignored if injustice to this one citizen would benefit the rest of society. Rawls believes that a social contract theory, similar those proposed by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, would be a more logical solution to the question of fairness in any government. Social contract theory in general and including the views of Rawls, is such that in a situation where a society is established of people who are self interested, rational, and equal, the rules of justice are established by what is mutually acceptable and agreed upon by all the people therein. This scenario of negotiating the laws of that society that will be commonly agreed upon and beneficial to all is what Rawls terms "The Original Position and Justification".

    Read More

  • John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice holds that a rational, mutually disinterested individual in the Original Position and given the task of establishing societal rules to maximise their own happiness throughout life, is liable to choose as their principles of justice a) guaranteed fundamental liberties and b) the nullification of social and economic disparities by universal equality of opportunities, which are to be of greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society , . Rawls’ system of societal creation has both strengths and weaknesses, but is ultimately sound.

    Read More

  • Is rule-utilitarianism preferable to act-utilitarianism

    1769 Words  | 4 Pages

    Classical utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory which holds that an action can only be considered as morally right where its consequences bring about the greatest amount of good to the greatest number (where 'good' is equal to pleasure minus pain). Likewise, an action is morally wrong where it fails to maximise good. Since it was first articulated in the late 19th Century by the likes of Jeremy Bentham and later John Stewart Mill, the classical approach to utilitarianism has since become the basis for many other consequentialist theories such as rule-utilitarianism and act-utilitarianism upon which this essay will focus (Driver, 2009). Though birthed from the same utilitarian principle of maximising good, rule-utilitarianism and act-utilitarianism provide two very different accounts on how the maximising of good should be approached. This essay will compare these two approaches and try to ascertain whether rule-utilitarianism is indeed preferable to act-utilitarianism.

    Read More

  • Distributive Justice By Robert Nozick And John Rawls

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e achieved when the Liberty and Difference Principle are enacted with the veil of ignorance. On the contrary, Nozick argues that Rawls’s theory is exactly the sort of patterned principle that infringes upon individual liberty. As an alternative, Nozick provides his unpatterned principle as the ideal distribution of goods in a society. To me, Rawls’s argues his theory in a manner where his principles of justice are not only difficult to achieve, but ultimately are exceedingly deficient in providing general utility. The veil of ignorance has proved to be almost impossible as well as unethical. The Difference Principle in itself is unable to justly distribute property since it clearly violates an individual’s liberty. Since Rawls’s method of distributive justice is rendered unreasonable and inefficient, it leaves us with a clear answer derived from two disjunctions.

    Read More

  • Rawls Justice Is Fairness

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    & nbsp;                                       Take Home Exam # 1: Essay-2 John Rawls never claimed to know the only way to start a society, but he did suggest a very sound and fair way to do so. He based his scenario on two principles of justice. His first principle of justice was that everyone should have the same rights as others.

    Read More

More about Ti Rawls: The Two Principles Of Justice

Open Document