Thorndike's Theory Of Human Learning

1425 Words3 Pages

Summary Connectionism which states that behavioral responses to specific stimuli are established through a process of trial and error that affects neural connections between the stimuli and the most satisfying responses. Thorndike postulated that the most fundamental type of learning involves the forming of associations (connections) between sensory experiences (perceptions of stimuli or events) and neural impulses (responses) that manifest themselves behaviorally. He believed that learning often occurs by trial and error (selecting and connecting). (Schunk, 2016) Human learning can be very complex because people in this world like to learn when they connect ideas, analyze things and reason certain things. I would also agree that in order for someone to learn something there has to be an opportunity to try something and eventually errors will come up. A mistake is something that will keep us learning new things. For some people connectionism is not effective because they are afraid from failure. With errors occurring, connectionism can be damaging. Classical conditioning is a multistep procedure that …show more content…

(Schunk, 2016) Combining acts and movements will lead to contiguous conditioning. Guthrie believed that responses do not need to be rewarded to be learned. Rather, learning requires close pairing in time between stimulus and response. (Schunk, 2016) According to Schunk; “contiguous theory is useful when we need to eliminate bad habits in certain environments.” In order for someone to learn and be interested in learning the information provided needs to be interesting to the learner in order to be retained. Sometimes we catch ourselves reading certain material and it is completely out of subject in what we are interested in. This will make it very difficult for our brain to process and retain that

Open Document