Things They Carried 'By Tim O' Brien: Character Analysis

498 Words1 Page

In The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, moral ambiguity is often present in order to distort the reader’s judgement on whether the characters are purely good or purely evil. The contrast between the two characteristics depend on the situation the narrator is in. At a time of war, morality is not questioned or thought of because of the surroundings and nature of war. Tim O’Brien uses his experience in which his moral ambiguity is present and shares his story with readers of this book. The moral ambiguity relates to the plot by revealing the effects of war and the experiences soldiers endured during their combat. “The Man I Killed,” describes the time in which O’Brien kills a Vietnamese soldier going down a path. The author repeatedly mentions his figure after the killing and the identity of the man he killed. According to O’Brien, the men he killed was in love with mathematics and was soon going to be a professor of it. The moral ambiguity is shown through O’Brien’s reaction and his friend, Kiowa, attempting to make him feel better about the situation explaining there is nothing O’Brien could have done. This relates to readers by distinguishing two groups of opinions: a group that judges O’Brien for not showing mercy on the young soldier with a bright future, and a group that things there wasn’t anything O’Brien could have done. …show more content…

In sum, O’Brien saw the young man walking towards him through the fog and, by instinct, threw a grenade towards him, ending his life and leaving a star-shaped hole in his eye. O’Brien states that he wanted to warn the young soldier of what he had done, which shows the moral ambiguity in O’Brien. In warm acting upon instinct is natural and is overlooked. This relates to the work as a whole by revealing that even in the moment of killing, a soldier might second guess

Open Document