Theories Of Serial Killers

2292 Words5 Pages

Jacob Bollen
Kelly Hagen
English 50
19 May 2014
Born a Killer or Learned to Be a Killer?
Serial killers have fascinated and intrigued the world for centuries. It seems like everybody wants to know why serial killers do what they do and how they can live with themselves after doing something so terrible. Some may believe that a serial killer is anyone who kills more than one person, but the FBI defines serial killers as someone who murders at least three people with significant pauses between incidents (Culture and Understanding). There are two main theories to explain the behavior of serial killers. One being nature and one being nurture. The nature side of this theory about serial killers says that people including serial killers, do what they do because they were born that way, usually due to a chemical imbalance in their brain or inherited characteristics. The nurture side of the argument says that people do what they do and make the decisions because of the way that they were raised, what they were taught and things of that sort. One example of how nature affects serial killers is psychopathology and one example of how nurture affects serial killers is being brought up in an abusive home environment. Both of these things can contribute to serial killers behaviors.
There are two theories that better explain what nature vs. nurture is and how they affect everyones behavior in life, especially serial killers. One of these theories is the learning theory and the other is the psychodynamics theory. The learning theory is the nurture part of the nature vs. nurture argument, stating that it is not genes that determine our behavior and personality, but how we are raised. Certain events that happen during childhood can trigger things...

... middle of paper ...

...gnosed as a psychopath but can function in society. Sometimes they are married and are completely able to have a life, their lives are not 100% focused on killing. An unsuccessful psychopath is the complete opposite, someone who is a danger to society and someone that cannot be left alone to roam the streets. There is a lot of controversy whether serial killers can be categorized under unsuccessful or successful psychopaths which was another main point of the article. Although, I was unable to include this in my essay, I still got a good quote from the article, “The prevalence of psychopathy is not definitively known, but is estimated at approximately 0.6–1% in general populations (Coid, Yang, Ullrich, Roberts, & Hare, 2009)”. This gave readers an idea of how many psychopaths there are in the world which supported my argument that not all psychopaths are killers.

Open Document