Theme Of The Individual And Society In A Doll's House

1031 Words3 Pages

Discuss the Theme of the Individual and Society in the Work a Doll’s House A Doll’s House is a work by the author Henrik Ibsen who has been internationally known for being avant-garde in lifestyle and current society when it was first published in 1879. Henrik Ibsen was an important figure in the 19th century, he was a Norwegian playwright, theatre director and poet. He was often referred to as the “father of realism” and was also one of the founders for modern theatre. The play A Doll’s House became the most performed play by the early 20th century. There were many discussions about a Doll’s house on how it reflects the current social issues of society with the slight approach to feminism. The play consists of nine characters and three acts …show more content…

As the play progresses we see that the woman characters are stronger than the male ones. Ibsen has really succeeded to portray how much more woman sacrifice themselves in both society nowadays and in the play. “Helmer: No man can be expected to sacrifice his honour, even for the person he loves. Nora: millions of women have done it.” This quotation in act three is particularly powerful as it perfectly represents the actions that all the female characters have done. For example, Mrs Linde abandoned her true love, Krogstad, who was poor so she could marry a rich man so that she would be able to take care of her penniless mother and her two brothers. In this case love was sacrificed. In the play the nanny is not seen as a very important character in the play as she is not present often. However, without her Nora would not be here today. The nanny abandoned her own children to work for Nora’s family so that she could earn a living. Throughout the first two acts Nora sacrifices her true self so that she can be the perfect stereotypical housewife for her husband. She lives to please the ones around her instead of being true to herself and being happy. She also protects her husband by endangering herself when getting the loan from Krogstad. Nora’s abandonment of the children at the end of the play can also be considered as an act of self-sacrifice. Despite Nora’s eternal love for her children, she thought that she corrupted them and that it was best to leave them is in their best interest as she firmly believes that the nanny will be a better mother to

Open Document