The Yellow Wallpaper Argument

644 Words2 Pages

Their Eyes Were Watching God: Critical School (Feminism) 1) “Such a story ought not to be written” was one criticism that the author, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, received after her story “The Yellow Wallpaper” first came out in New England Magazine in 1891. The protest continued: “It was enough to drive anyone mad to read it.” Discuss this critical review based on your reading of Gilman’s explanation for her purpose of writing the short story (as found in the article “Why I Wrote ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’”). This review of “The Yellow Wallpaper” sounds like it was from the perspective of someone who would want the narrator stay inside all day to cure her mental illness. The critic who wrote this review comes off as condescending, as …show more content…

One who might think otherwise are the men forcing their wives into the housemaker role, trying to keep women entrapped. Gilman isn’t exploiting mentally ill women to make a taut psychological thriller, she’s telling them to break free from the patriarchal grasp that is the domestic lifestyle.
4) Tie Gilman’s explanation for her purpose in writing “The Yellow Wallpaper” (as stated in the article) to early feminism. Be sure to include references to the story as well as to the other works that you read in this unit. Gilman’s explanation for writing “The Yellow Wallpaper” is to liberate women from their domineering husbands. Joe and Logan Killicks from Their Eyes Were Watching God are examples of these men. They want Janie to fit a traditional role of what a patriarchal society thinks what a woman should be. Louise Mallard from “The Story of an Hour” is a woman contained by the domestic lifestyle so much that she fears her husband and rejoices when he is reported dead. Mrs. Mallard and her husband are obviously not in a mutual relationship, Mr Mallard obviously acts as the dominant, while Mrs Mallard is forced into being the

Open Document