The Wolf Of Wall Street Analysis

1518 Words4 Pages

Must someone become poor in order for another to become rich? This idea of class is present in both The Wolf of Wall Street and in The Great Gatsby. Jordan Belfort, the main character in The Wolf of Wall Street, Is a young man living in New York City working for a huge stock firm. He makes very little money and is told by his superior that he is “lower than scum.” Flash-Forward 3 years, and he is easily making millions of dollars per year, owning a huge house and expensive cars. Gatsby’s rise to stardom is very similar to Belforts. He starts out as a poor young man, and through certain methods, however lewd they may be, becomes one of the wealthiest men in New York. Through both of these characters rise to riches, we see that class is a zero …show more content…

He says to Nick, “I wanted somebody who wouldn't gossip” (114), after Nick asks what happened to all of them. This portrays not only his privacy and lack of trust, but also that he feels it necessary to take money from others in order keep his wealth and power. He knows that he cannot let word get out that he is meeting with Daisy, because if it did, it could ruin him. He is taking money, however small it may be to him, from others in order to keep his high social standing. The only money we actually hear about Gatsby getting, moral or immoral, is Dan Cody giving him his inheritance. In both Belfort and Gatsby’s case, it seems as if they used very unethical and immoral methods to gain their wealth.

Both Belfort and Gatsby use immoral and unethical methods to achieve their wealth, which includes taking money from the poor, so they can fit in with high society. Both texts show the rise and fall of very successful “businessmen,” but the way in which they got their money can be easily scrutinized and frowned upon. In Belfort’s case, he first starts selling stock to the wealthiest people in the country, where he only makes a very small percentage of it. When he gets laid off, he

Open Document