The White Man's Burden By Rudyard Kipling

1498 Words3 Pages

Paternalism vs. Agency
When examining historical political cartoons, an individual must be cognizant not only of the lens with which they see the world, but the lenses that others use to view such items. Each viewer brings a set of life experiences and biases that shape their perceptions, in ways both subtle and profound. Those who favored emancipation and Reconstruction argued for better treatment of newly freed men and women, but at times may have done so from a sense of paternalism, a prescient assumption of Rudyard Kipling’s 1899 poem “The White Man’s Burden: The United States and the Philippine Islands.” Visual representations often portrayed blacks as passive victims of racist southerners and neglected to show them as individuals who …show more content…

It depicts a U.S. Marshal protecting a cowering freed man from a rich southerner with a whip. The title is a reference to the possible end of military occupation of the Reconstruction-era South as northerners began to grow tired of the expense of Reconstruction and the attention being paid to the problems of the south. In the engraving, the southerner appears as a diabolical figure, the marshal is heroic, and the black man is a defenseless victim. The caption, however, complicates matters. It is a quotation from an editorial in the Birmingham (Alabama) News that reads, “We intend to beat the negro in the battle of life & defeat means one thing—EXTERMINATION.” The statement is not a reflection of what the artist believes, rather an indictment of the sentiment expressed by a southern newspaper. The artist is credited as an essentially anonymous “C.S.R.”, who can be assumed a white northerner attempting to influence white northern readers of Harper’s Weekly to oppose an end to the military occupation of the South. If U.S. forces were to withdraw, the clear implication is that a resumption of white supremacy akin to slavery would occur, thereby assuaging the concern of the Birmingham News author. A sympathetic northerner might see this piece and feel a return to the outrages and injustices of the past were too high a price to pay for the removal of the …show more content…

Both scenarios are somewhat fanciful depictions that serve as stinging indictments of white southerners. In the first, he shows a dignified black farm worker carrying a hoe and pick axe. His former master idly reads a newspaper while he leans back in his chair and says, “My boy, we’ve toiled and taken care of you long enough—now you’ve got to work!” A careless glimpse at the cartoon might lead the viewer to conclude that Nast is expressing the viewpoint of the white southerner, but the headline makes it clear that the artist is ridiculing the outrageous claim. The notion that a white plantation owner had toiled to take care of enslaved people who had worked under the worst possible conditions year after year is patently ludicrous. But unlike the distracted, obnoxious former master, the black worker stands upright and in the foreground, an image of strength and

Open Document