The Unreliable Narrator In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

753 Words2 Pages

Frankenstein, although well-educated himself, is a very closed-minded individual. He soaks in the information that he first learns from a young age and refuses to examine the perspectives of other scientists or educators. A later omitted text from Mary Shelley’s original draft of Frankenstein states that (when Frankenstein visited Oxford) “We found that the regulations of this university were much improved since the days of Gibbon, but there is still in fashion a great deal of bigotry and devotion to established rules that constrains the mind of students and leads to slavish and narrow principles of action” (Bugg 657). Not only does this briefly touch on Shelley’s belief that discrimination was actively being taught at universities in England,
Was the Creature truly as horrid as Frankenstein makes him out to be, or is Frankenstein merely using such compelling adjectives because that is how people of distinct color and appearance were described at the time? When Frankenstein realizes that the Creature is not what he expected him to be, Frankenstein resents the Creature, refusing to look at or talk to him. In this way, Frankenstein is the worst educator (and possibly the most unreliable narrator) in the novel. He teaches the Creature nothing in order to remain above the Creature. If the Creature were to learn all of the language and mathematics that Frankenstein knows, it would then put him on the same intellectual level as Frankenstein himself. This refusal to educate slaves is the same logic that was used by slave-owners of slaves such as Equiano. There may even be a small possibility that Frankenstein detested the Creature when he realized that the Creature may be able to possess the ability to read and write. Frankenstein did not want to create anything close to a human companion when creating the Creature, he only wanted to create a slave that would procreate and form a “family” of slaves who would not only give Frankenstein the satisfaction of company but would assist him in scientific experiments. “A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me” (Shelley

Open Document