More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of globalization on society
Benefits and challenges associated with expression of cultural identity
Impact of culture on identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence of globalization on society
It is one of my traditions to call my grandparents and aunts who reside in my natal country (El Salvador) every Sunday. Whenever my mother goes to the store, she prioritizes buying imported Salvadoran products to make a good, typical Salvadoran meal. I miss my country’s traditions and culture, I also miss my family and friends, however, thanks to the new technological innovations, I get the opportunity to communicate with my relatives and remind myself of where I come from. Globalization provides individuals with great general interactive opportunities, without it, many countries would have difficulties progressing and collaborating with each other. In Jared Diamond’s 1997 written work, Guns, Germs, and Steel, he attempts to answer Yali’s question
The world has been steadily growing in population, but shrinking in both the literal and metaphorical vastness of society. With a boom in technological invention, the world has discovered new ways of international trade, transportation and communication. With this comes the ability to interact closely with other cultures. In an article about globalization, Deborah Knight says “Go to your local supermarket and you can buy grapes from Chile or tomatoes from Mexico. Call the help desk for the computer you just bought, and the person you talk to is in India. Purchase a shirt and it will bear a tag from China, Indonesia or El Salvador. Go through your daily routines and you will almost surely encounter people who have immigrated to the United States
DeJonge, Alissa. Globalization: How to Maximize Gain and Minimize Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Welcome to college! You can only afford to maintain two of the next three options: adequate sleep, a social life, and good grades. In Dani Rodrik’s new book- The Globalization Paradox, a similar triangle is evinced. The author presents us with a “trilemma” consisting of Hyperglobalization, Democratic politics, and the Nation-State. You can efficiently balance two of these three triangle “corners”– but no more than two. Rodrik claims our current worldview on globalization is that the more of it- the merrier. Yet this is flawed thinking in the fact that bigger globalization isn’t necessarily better globalization, instead we need to strive for “smart” globalization over “maximum” globalization. Rodrik uses a vast amount of real world events, past and present theories, and statistics as evidence. In this essay I will first give a brief overview of Rodrik’s main argument and his evidence supporting it. Moreover, I will attempt to compare Rodrik’s argument(s) to Friedman’s. Finally, I will analyze the specific claim Rodrik makes (and one I found most interesting) concerning hyperglobalization’s hindrance on national democracies.
Overtime, as shown through the shift from Fordist to Post-Fordist ideals for production, it takes long period of time to mix people and nations closer together. This is being done through technological innovation, as technology is helping to dissolve former barriers of time and distance. Factories that used to dominate the United States have now spread throughout the world, providing jobs for people globally. Consumers are also on an international level, as there is a greater awareness and understanding of what is happening everywhere. Globalization, however, also produces economic and social disorders while producing public concerns over job security, the distribution of economic gains, and the impact of instability on people. Many people also worry about a growing focus of economic power, harm to the environment, danger to public health and safety, the breakup of native cultures, and the loss of power and responsibility within government. I believe that as a global citizen, I have to look at all perspectives from people in different situations and realization how current times have come to be. I am a part of an entire world community and all my actions, although in a miniscule amount, contribute to building the world’s community values and practices. By living in the United States and attending UW Madison, I
Kofi Annan, a UN diplomat, once said,“...that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity.” He is undoubtedly correct in this assessment. Indeed, globalization is no longer something to be skeptical of, it is very real and is changing our world exponentially. The affects of globalization, however, continue to be a heated topic for debate. Proponents praise the overall economic lift provided by free trade, the diffusion of cultures, and the spread of democracy and capitalism. Critics cry foul at the loss of national identity, the accelerated and uncontrolled use of natural resources, and the redistribution of wealth into the hands of a few very powerful people and corporations. Globalization is a polarizing topic and it has affected people in different and varying ways. I looked back over my life, looking for personal experiences that represent the affect of globalization upon my life. It is difficult to pinpoint exact experiences, but it is clear the broader affects globalization has had on my life such as in the spread of cultural practices such as yoga or foreign entertainment, or the rapid demise of the Midwestern manufacturing industry.
Kofi Annan once said, “Arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity”. Globalization is an inevitable phenomenon in human history that brings about greater interconnectivity and integration of people worldwide. Over the past few decades, the pace of global integration has accelerated quickly and dramatically due to unprecedented advancements in technology, communications, science, transport and industry (The World Bank, 2013). Globalization affects economical, cultural, technological, political and social aspects of a country. In this essay, we’ll be talking about cultural globalization and its effects solely. Cultural globalization is the rapid movement of ideas, attitudes, values across national borders and the “the emergence of a specific set of values and beliefs that are largely shared around the planet” (Castells, 2009, p. 117). Circulation of ideas has allowed people to partake in extended social relations that cross national and regional borders, leading to the diffusion of cultures. Due to increasing interconnectedness, there is formation of shared norms and knowledge in which people associate their individual and collective cultural identities with. Cultural globalization is a double-edged sword with both benefits and disadvantages to society. However, its threats to national traditions outweigh the progress it contributes to society.
The idea of globalization and modernization was born out of the capitalist market mentality in the age of technology. "Globalization occurs when an organization extends its activities to other parts of the world, actively participates in other markets, and competes against organizations located in other countries" (Holton p.36). Bangladesh allows foreign companies to enter into our market. Our companies are also allowed to enter foreign markets. Globalization makes international borders vanish and increases competition in the market place. In the modern world, globalization also has an impact on our culture and social life. For example, MacDonalds introduced American fast food to other parts of the world. Foreign media introduces different cultures to the different nations. In my last essay, I discussed the disadvantages of globalization in Canada. Other countries, like Bangladesh benefit from opening their borders for trade and investment by increasing their modernity.
Mudimbe-Boyi, Elisabeth (ed.). 2002. Beyond Dichotomies: Histories, Identities, Cultures, and the Challenge of Globalization. Albany: State University of New York Press.
...the American dream and western way of life is being forced upon cultures all around the world. These large communications companies hold the power over information and culture and act as the catalyst in the process of the homogenization of global cultures thus creating a one-world culture. This movement towards cultural homogeneity does not come without the elimination or eradication of heterogeneity (Zhang, 48). The amalgamation of cultures into one western Americanized culture does not allow for the celebration of cultural differences or promote the uniqueness of traditional cultures. Globalization and development is based on the idea that in order for countries to prosper they must become like the western world, more specifically America, and this ideology has destroyed cultures globally and created a McWorld where faster, cheaper, bigger and western is better.
Most civilizations and groups of people are forgotten soon after their destruction. As a society collapses, their role in global history is rarely acknowledged after a few decades. It is only if a society proves to be far bigger and bolder than the surrounding population, that their legacy just may be admired and talked about. Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies tells a tale of how the different peoples came to dominate world history and the factors that made their prosperity prevalent for centauries to follow. From economics to politics to war; the gap of superiority demonstrated by various groups throughout history remains a theme central to this novel.
The advancement in the technology enables companies to widen their reach through communicating globally. It allows them to go beyond their boarders and explore transactions to different countries. Communication becomes easier which resulted to better business transactions.
In this article the author discuss about the social impact of the Globalization in the developing countries of the world. The article is the result of four years research, the basic purpose behind this research was to delete the misunderstandings and the impacts of globalization. After 80’s the economy of world was too much interrelated and connected with each other, as well as the FDI (Foreign direct Investment) begins to rise up significantly. The information and communication programs begin to enhance and the distance between the world countries become more less. For example by the invention of telephone the distance between the countries of world becomes more less
Theodore Levitt (Levitt, 1983) was one of the first academics to write about globalisation in 1983 and he highlighted the important role of technology in the globalisation of markets and thus, ‘converging commonality’ in countries around the planet. In Levitt’s ‘Globalisation of markets’, he suggested that cultural differences due to globalisation were becoming more homogenised, perhaps predicting the condition of contemporary society today. However society has changed since then and the meaning of globalisation with it, and the widespread view of globalisation being homogenous or even to some extent being described as ‘Americanisation; has somewhat diminished. Dr Moises Naim (Naim, 2009) explains how even America have greatly benefited from globalisation, highlighting that globalisation is bigger than one of the world’s biggest super power. Furthermore, Naim explains how relationships between countries has moved from simply co-operating to integrating with one another, sharing ideas, knowledge and culture. In the same way, Scholte (Scholte, 2008) sustains this notion, calling globalisation the ‘spread of trans-planetary and the reduction in barriers to trans-world social contacts. Highlighting that this is the new characteristic of contemporary society; world-wide
The term “globalize” started being used in the modern times. However globalization is an idea that has been brought up since even before the 1500’s when people started forming connections between communities, and therefore creating forms of communication. In the modern era we call it "Globalization" which is known for being a process of a world wide connection and integration in many different ways. Usually It is almost always about international trade, foreign investment,and capital flow. But what about culture, identity, and traditions? True, if globalization is viewed strictly from economic terms, then the debate delves into trade barriers, protectionism and tariffs. Powerful countries demand that smaller countries break down all trade barriers, while maintaining a level of protectionism over their own. Smaller countries, knowing that they cannot do much to hide from the hegemonic nature of globalization, form their own economic clubs, hoping to negotiate fairer deals. But between diplomacy and threats, dialogue and arm twisting, the side of globalization with which most of the people are familiar; there is another side of globalization: cultural globalization. In this paper, I will be arguing that the social cultural impact of globalization is good, and it does not result in monoculture. And the opposition is: the social cultural impact of globalization is bad, and it results in monoculture. Before I start my argument, I w...
The world is a constantly changing place and the relationships, or lack there of, of the people in it are the primary source of the change. Growing partnerships and the creation of a "global community" are being encouraged and defined by the term known as globalization. At the same time, the need for tradition and individual culture has perpetuated localization. Events that happen everyday around the world prove that both of these phenomena do have a prominent role in our society, and by studying these occurrences, we can better explain the benefits and consequences of the circumstances.