Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis Camus's The Stranger
Critical analysis of the stranger by albert camus
Stranger by camus essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis Camus's The Stranger
In the novel The Stranger by Albert Camus, the narrator’s monotonous tone makes the reader experience a lack of emotion and feeling. The novel starts off describing Mersault’s current job and how he must go on leave in order to attend his mother’s funeral. He and his mother have been disconnected for some time as they had come to a mutual agreement with her staying in an elderly home. Mersault, the main protagonist, did not have the money or time to tend to his mother. The elderly home was the best option for the both of them. When he returns home from the funeral, Mersault gets caught up in external affairs he should not be in. He ends up writing a break up letter to Raymond’s girlfriend, which drives the rest of the story. Raymond beats his …show more content…
Mersault ends up shooting the Arabian brother and is tried in court. Mersault’s insensitivity and ignorance regarding his mother’s death, Raymond’s abuse, and the murder leaves the reader in a bleak mood after experiencing such a dry, emotionless tone. Mersault’s attitude towards his mother’s death exemplifies and introduces the reader to his lack of remorse. The opening sentence of the novel shows how indifferent he is as he has no guilt for not being there for his mother nor grief for her passing when receiving the telegram notifying him of her sudden death, “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know” (Camus 3). He is very direct and his diction offers short, little details, evoking the attitude of disregard in Mersault. When approaching his boss for two days off, he does not show any sign of emotion, but tries to justify the reason for his leaving as his mother’s fault. The funeral director takes him to his mother’s coffin, to find that it has already been sealed. To the caretaker’s and director’s surprise, Mersault does not want it to be opened. He does not mind that they have skipped past formalities of allowing close family members to view their deceased relatives by sealing …show more content…
By writing this letter, Mersault gets himself into an ironic situation where he ends up killing the man that Raymond was supposed to kill. Moreover, Mersault does not feel guilty for his actions dating back to his mother’s funeral to now as he is put on trial for the murder he should not have been involved in. At the point in the novel, all the events that have happened are being brought up against Mersault in his murder trial. Attendees of his mother’s funeral are present as witnesses to describe Mersault’s actions at her funeral. Mersault was in total acceptance of the situation and did not think much of it as the witnesses on the stand describe him to be careless and unloving. One begins to feel sympathetic and understanding of Mersault’s situation after all this evidence is being wrongly used against him. The tone of the novel shifts to a more serious and concerning mood. By contrast, Mersault’s emotionless tone stays constant as he is being falsely accused, without bursting into an outrage. Marie is brought to the stand and the prosecutor begins to explain uncorrelated events based on fallacious beliefs in an order that makes it seem as though Mersault murdered his own mother and the
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
Chapter 6 of part I of The Stranger concluded with Meursault’s conscious decision to shoot an Arab because of the physical discomfort the Arab’s knife caused him. The significance of the ending of part I is that it was the first demonstration of Meursault’s awareness of the possible consequences of the act that he committed. This awareness continues into the second part of the novel as he is arrested and trialed. The reason for Meursault’s trial is the murder of the Arab. His insensitivity towards Maman’s death and lack of a social conscientious are factors that contributed to support further investigations, but are not reasons to trial him because they have not ‘harmed’ society on a way that he could be arrested for. For example, if Meursault
In Camus’ The Stranger, the use of the minor character Raymond helps illustrate the absurd nature of Meursault. Through imagery, dialogue, and irony, the novel investigates the moral decisions Meursault makes under Raymond’s influence. The constant tactical bribery and other forms of manipulation steer Meursault’s writing of the letter that leads to him killing the Arab and ultimately receiving the death penalty. Camus uses Raymond to highlight the cultural and societal values. In addition, through Raymond’s help, Meursault ends up in jail where he finally realizes the theme that life is
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
...r has not done makes no essential difference at the end. The nurse at the funeral tells him, "if you walk too slowly, you'll get heat exhaustion, but if you walk too fast, then the cool air in church will give you a chill.” As he kills the Arab, he thinks, "Whether I fire or don't fire is irrelevant; the ending will be the same.” And at the trial, Meursault tells the prosecutor, "I have lived my life thus and did x, but if I had done y or z instead, it wouldn't have mattered.” And, ultimately, Meursault turns out to be correct; he discovers that when death approaches, all men are equal, no matter what their ages or previous lives. Meursault views death as an escape: you can't escape from it, but you can escape into it, and he prepares himself to do so, bit by bit. Each parellel incident is just one more winding round of the rope that will bind him completely.
Through Dysart’s self-diagnosis given throughout Equus, Shaffer directly conflicts with where focus of the story should be thrown, and an unintentional glorification of Dysart is displayed in result. The focus of the story strays, and although Dysart remains fascinated with Alan throughout the duration of the play, his fascination turns selfish, and he reflects more upon his own life than he does Alan’s. Dysart’s name is the first on the list of characters, and he opens the play as well, therefore, the focus of the reader/audience is automatically thrown towards Dysart, and he is expected to be the main focus of the play. Similar to Equus, through Camus’ presentation of Meursault to the jury in The Stranger, he suggests the selfish and corrupt nature of the self-serving institution of the law. Meursault is the sole reason for the trial that takes place, but his story starts to matter less and less throughout the duration of the trial. The members of the law become more concerned with glorifying their side of the story, and in result, winning the case.
Mersault is characterized by an indifference to change. At one time, Mersault gets an invitation to move to Paris by his boss, but he declines. Mersault says that "people never change their lives, that in any case one life was as good as another and that I wasn't dissatisfied with mine at all." (Camus, p. 41) Mersault is content with what he got. He has his work, his home and his girl: it's all he needs. He lives, like Roquentin, in solitude, reflecting upon the actions of others. But he never gets involved since it doesn't matter to him. He neither feels happy nor sad. It is as if all emotions were drained from his body.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
In the novel, we are given a more complete view of Meursault. The story is told from his point-of-view, which allows us to understand the situation as Meursault perceives it. Looking at the situation in this light, we can see Meursault as not evil, but simply indifferent and detached from life. He doesn’t attempt to get wrapped up in emotion or relationships, he just takes things as they come, doing whatever is easiest for him. He becomes friends with Raymond and agrees to marry Marie simply because he doesn’t have a very good reason not to. Seeing the story from Meursault’s viewpoint, we understand that even killing the Arab wasn’t an act of malice or evil intent. As Meursault puts it, “My nature is such that my physical needs often get in the way of my feelings.” With this in context, things begin to make more sense. Meursault’s seemingly cryptic statement that he murdered the Arab “because of the sun” can be taken as truth. Meursault does things that society judges as wrong not because he is evil or wants to appear immoral, but because the sun and heat, symbols for Meursault’s emotional state, cause him to become uncomfortable and act “inappropriately.
This calming diction shows that Mersault is experiencing a different kind of emotional release; not one of anger but of acceptance. After all of the instances where the light was overwhelming to Mersault, he finds peace in the darkness. He is able to recognize truth. For the first time, “I felt as if I understood,” not only the imminence of death, but the intentions of his mother (122). Mersault feels a human connection: a novel idea after all of his experiences with Raymond, Salamano, and Marie. Therefore, as Mersault faces death, he “opened [him]self to the gentle indifference of the world” (122). He recognizes that man has no control over his fate: he would still be facing the “dark wind” (122) whether or not “the sentence had been read at eight o’clock at night and not at five o’clock” (109). Thus, in the face of death, Mersault reaches his enlightened state. There is no meaning in life: the universe is indifferent to the actions of mankind. Meaning is arbitrarily ascribed by individuals, such as the lawyers and jury who found it gravely repulsive that Mersault did not cry at his mother’s funeral. Though he spent his whole live denouncing arbitrary meaning in life, in the moments before his death, Mersault begs for human connection and empathy. He wishes for his death to have meaning, and for others to create that meaning with “cries of hate”
As part of his revenge Raymond beats up his girlfriend, only to be followed by her Arab brother. At this time Raymond thinks Meursault to be his good friend and takes him to his friend Masson's beach house, where the two major violent acts that lead to Meursault's ultimate metamorphosis takes place.
First, Raymond influences Meursault negatively as seen when he convinces Meursault to testify against a woman who was supposedly cheating on Raymond which eventually leads to him downfall, his death sentence. Without any evidence or proper reasoning, Raymond falls into a craze where a simple lottery ticket and bracelet deemed his mistress as a cheater. With thorough conviction and compliments, Raymond manipulates Meursault into agreeing with everything he has to say. He blames everything that happens between him and the Arab on the Arab, and presents himself as the victim. He says “I was about to help him up but he started kicking me” (29), but refrains from mentioning that the Arab was actually the beaten mistress’ brother until later. Raymond consistently tells Meursault “I knew about things, I could help h...
The trial portrays the absurdist ideal that absolute truth does not exist. This ideal destroys the very purpose of the trial, which seeks to place a rational explanation on Meursault’s senseless killing of the Arab. However, because there is no rational explanation for Meursault’s murder, the defense and prosecution merely end up constructing their own explanations. They each declare their statements to be the truth, but are all based on false assumptions. The prosecution itself is viewed as absurd. The prosecutor tries to persuade the jury that Meursault has no feelings or morals by asking Perez if “he had at least seen [Meursault] cry” (91). The prosecutor then continues to turn the crowd against Meursault when he asks him about his “liaison” with Marie right after his mother’s death. Though Meursault’s relationship with Marie and his lack of emotions at his mother’s funeral may seem unrelated to his murder, the prosecutor still manages to convince the crowd that they are connected to one another. The jury ends up convicting Meursault not because he killed a man, but because he didn't show the proper emotions after his mother ...
”(Camus 19). Mersault did not show any emotion at all while at the nursing home where Maman lived. He is just there because he feels like he has to be. Everything about the weekend seems to annoy him, events like the vigil, the funeral, and some of Maman’s friends, in particular to the sobbing woman at the vigil. Another aspect of the existentialism portrayed in The Stranger is that Mersault focuses mainly on physical sensations with his relationship with Marie.
Mrs.Mallard for the first time experiences freedom and see the world in a new perspective that she did not see before her husband 's supposed death. Mrs.Mallard see the world with more life and takes in the atmosphere of life around her and as the narrator describes Mrs