The Soiling Of Old Glory Analysis

1612 Words4 Pages

For Stanley Forman, a photographer of the Herald American news, it was unlike any other day heading to work. News in Boston, which had been going on for months, stated that the protest over a “court-ordered school desecration” was still being held as active. Assigned the task, Forman’s job was to take photos at the City Hall Plaza, where a couple of high school students would demonstrate to the crowd. It seems that Forman wasn’t in such a hurry; however, what came next soon baffled a life as the “agitated” students made their way to a well-dressed black man and attacked as he was walking to City Hall. As the man tried to flee, he found himself about to be assaulted with an American flag by one of the protestors. Forman, who had already snapped over a dozen photos at the scene, caught the image (Sullivan). Although the photo taken was nearly three decades ago, The Soiling of Old Glory caused shock towards the entire nation, which stirred emotions and confusion. It caused a wide range of effects, which drastically changed the lives of the photographer and two main people in the photo. However, because of Boston’s negative view from the public made the photo unnecessary to publish. …show more content…

Beatty, reviewer of the book The Soiling of Old Glory, said it was shortly after the release of Forman’s shocking photo that made the public well aware of who Forman was for quite a while afterwards (Beatty). Moreover, without using any words, Forman was able to express these societal conflicts through his photograph as well as stir American emotions regarding the event (Belisle). At one point, photographer Forman said, “I don’t want to say I was lucky to get it because I knew what I was doing, but I was lucky to get it.” He ended up winning his second Pulitzer Prize within two years

Open Document