The Social Brain Hypothesis

1803 Words4 Pages

Over 40 years ago, Henry Jerison identified a key difference between primates and all other vertebrates: primates have unusually large brains for their body size (Dunbar 2009). Initially, it was assumed that the evolution of large brains in primates was guided by ecological problems, such as foraging and other acts of survival. Today, the widely accepted theory is that there is a link between social complexity and brain expansion, and large brains in primates evolved as a means to manage their complex social lives - this explanation is known as the “social brain hypothesis.” The purpose of this paper is to not only examine the mechanisms underlying the social brain, but to also explore how it relates to the development of psychiatric and neurological …show more content…

According to Brothers, “the social brain” can be described as “the higher cognitive and affective systems in the brain that evolved as a result of increasingly complex social selective pressures,” and it is these systems that underlie our ability to function as highly social animals and provide the substrate for intact social cognition, social behavior and affective responsiveness (Brothers 1990, Burns 2006). In other words, the evolution of a larger brain in primates has led to a number of relative behavioral specializations, the most important for our case being social cognition; it is these specializations that allow us to meaningfully evaluate a complex situation and interact with other …show more content…

Although all four structures work in concert with one another, each is observed to have a distinct function. Specifically, the amygdala is thought to be responsible for recognizing other’s emotional states; the STC analyzes body movements in order to predict the actions, or intentions, of others; the OFC is involved in social reinforcement; and the FFG plays a role in face detection (Pelphrey, Shultz, Hudac & Vander 2011). Support for this model can be found in numerous studies. For example, in an fMRI study of facial identity and expression, it was found that the amygdala was activated to various degrees when subjects were shown different emotional expressions (Gläscher, Gläscher, Weiller & Büchel 2004). In another fMRI study, the STS was activated when subjects observed humans moving, but not while inanimate objects moved (Pelphrey, Shultz, Hudac & Vander 2011). Furthermore, evidence for the OFC as an important structure for reward was seen when monkeys worked for electrical stimulation of this region when they were hungry, but not if they were satiated (Rolls 2000). Finally, the FFG, which contains a region called the fusiform face area (FFA), was shown to be

More about The Social Brain Hypothesis

Open Document