Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of the sniper and just lather thats all
The sniper compared to just lather
Political parties throughout american history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of the sniper and just lather thats all
We all have our own opinions on what is right and wrong and what makes us feel sympathetic or considerate to what is going on around us. No matter how much you dislike or look down on decisions and judgements of your neighbor we all have certain traits that make us resemble others. The Sniper and Lather and nothing else are two different short stories that at first seem completely different, but after looking deeper into them they may not be as different as they may seem. Before comparing these two stories you might ask yourself, How could two different time periods relate to each other? And can places on opposite parts of the world share the same issues? It shows us that in some ways we are all very different but in some ways we are all the …show more content…
Three similarities that overshadowed any others were that they both did their job for a reason, they were both republicans, and even though these stories occurred on opposite parts of the world they were both in war. In our society working plays a big role in sustaining our quality and way of life. To some working may be a must but to these two characters they worked for what they loved and believed in. Working to neither the barber or sniper was a form of income, but a form of their passions and beliefs in the society they were living in. The sniper was a republican and had such a strong belief in this form of government that he decided to join them in fighting in the civil war. To put your life at such risk and danger it would no longer be about any money you could be paid but the cause you are fighting for. The sniper shows true devotion for his belief by working a job that supports that. The barber has a sincere passion for his job as a honorable barber working hard to not let a single drop of blood be drawn from any of his customers. With his belief he went undercover as a revolutionary to get inside information on the free state. Both jobs that he worked showed different aspects of his personality, being a barber exhibited his passion, and ended up not killing torres because he loved it so much. Being an undercover republican brought great danger to his life but indicates the sacrifices he would make for what he believes in. The next similar trait is that both characters exhibit their beliefs in a number of audacious ways. The sniper was willing to kill numbers of people in the civil war under the name of being a republican and fighting under their rules and beliefs. He wanted a republican government so bad that he was willing to put his life and the lives of innocent others at risk. The reason he ended up losing his brother was
Rainsfords, Montresor, Walter Palmer, and The Sniper all killed. The Sniper was most justified killing his enemy. Three reasons why are because the brother shot first, he didn’t know it was his brother, he didn’t want to die he was already shot,it was a war. This could have happened to anyone. It was sad when that happened. This is why Why The Sniper is justified for killing his brother
These two stories, although written by two different authors present similarities in the characteristics of the main character. Sammy and Tommy are presented with adversity they had previously never faced. Sammy has to decide should he stand up for the girls by quitting and be the hero or should he mind his own business and keep his job. Sammy is forced to quickly make a decision which his boss Lengel feels he made to rashly. “’I don’t think you know what you’re saying,’ Lengel said” (Updike, pg. 146). For Sammy his decision is what he feels he needs to do and he never regrets his choice. Tommy is faced with adversity of a different kind, he has to decide should he believe the teacher and listen to what she is saying or should he, like the other children, think she is strange and a liar. When she loses her job Tommy is forced to make a decision, confront the child who got her fired, or stay quiet and let the matter slide as it is not his problem. For both the boys their actions could be beneficial to them or it could cause them future problems. An example, if Sammy...
In Liam O'Flaherty´s The Sniper, all of these are brought to an acute reality in a single war-torn city. Strong cerebral convictions and opposing philosophies, due to which people want to destroy.
The underlying themes of the stories are l valid contrasts between the works. In some portions the themes are of the same facets, such as how in both books two men have a direct conflict between
time of their works, they both had many similarities in the theme of their stories and their goals of writing the stories.
The perspective of the two stories allow the reader to perceive the sense of proximity the protagonist has with their victim. The Sniper is told in an objective point of view, the reader is presented only with short and factual information, keeping a distance between the reader and the story. Just Lather, That's All on the other hand, is told from a first person point of view, the reader intimately experiences the thoughts and feelings of the barber. The different points of view are used to give the reader an understanding of the distance the protagonists have with their victims. The third person point of view in The Sniper presents factual information, similar to how the sniper only knows what he sees of his targets. There is no compassion for the sniper when he is shot because it is stated in a neutral stand, just as he feels no compassion for his victims because he has not personally known them nor does he know their thoughts and feelings. The first person point of view in Just Lather, That's All gives a sense on empathy for the barber, as his thoughts and reasoning is presented, there is an understanding to why he d...
The sentence, “Placing a cigarette between his lips, he struck the match, inhaled the smoke hurriedly and put out the light.” demonstrates that the Republican sniper is exposing himself to snipers surrounding him, since there was visible light from igniting the match (1). In other words, a sniper that is waiting patiently to eliminate his victim, the Free Stater sniper, will notice the cigarette being lighted and will immediately shoot the source of the light. When the story continues, it is detected that the Free Stater sniper notices a light source, and quickly takes aim at it, believing the light source leads to an individual. This is noticeable because the Republican sniper is nearly dead a few seconds after lighting the cigarette, since the Free Stater sniper fired his gun after seeing suspicious activity of a match being illuminated. Also, the sentence shows that the Republican sniper did not presume that a possibility of his consequential action’s is that an enemy is going to shoot him, since he obviously exposed himself for others to detect. Even though the action of lighting the cigarette was not the most consequential action, it still caused a drastic situation for the main character. However, O’Flaherty’s description is not the only craft move he develops to convey the theme, action, without thought, to the reader. He also uses suspense
The main character of “The Sniper” is the republican sniper and the main character of the “Cranes” is Songsam. In “The Sniper”, the sniper is in a war and he is trying to kill his enemy. At the beginning of the story, he is on a rooftop near O’Connell Bridge lay watching. Beside him lay his rifle and over his shoulders was slung pair of field glasses. He looked like he was a student. He was self disciplined but was extremely devoted towards the war. He was eating a sandwich because he eaten nothing since morning. He is going to smoke but he paused and thought whether he should or shouldn’t but he did. In the “Cranes”, Korean War is going on. During this war, many villages along the thirty-eighth parallel changed hands several times.
Wes (the author) has a family who wants to see him succeed. Although Wes didn’t know his father for long, the two memories he had of him and the endless stories his mother would share with him, helped guide him through the right path. His mother, made one of the biggest effects in Wes’s life when she decided to send him to military story, after seeing he was going down the wrong path. Perhaps, the other Wes’s mother tried her best to make sure he grew up to be a good person, but unfortunately Wes never listen. His brother, Tony was a drug dealer who wish he could go back in time and make the right decisions and he wanted Wes to be different than him. He didn’t want his brother to end up like him and even after he tried everything to keep Wes away from drugs, nothing worked and he gave up. As you can see, both families are very different, Wes (the author) has a family who wants him to have a bright future. Most importantly, a family who responds fast because right after his mother saw him falling down the wrong hill she didn’t hesitate to do something about it. The other Wes isn’t as lucky, as I believe since his mother already had so much pressure over keeping her job and her son Tony being involved in drugs. Same thing with Tony, he was so caught up in his own business that no one payed so much attention to
Comparing The Sniper and Ambush There are many similarities and differences between the two short stories The Sniper and Ambush. Both short stories have very interesting settings that take place in different places. Ambush and The Sniper also have very similar characters but with very different outlooks and feelings. The two short stories have very intriguing but very similar themes. The settings in the short stories The Sniper and Ambush are very different but have a few similarities.
In both books, these two gangs decide to have a rumble, a fight with all the members of the two gangs. This is one similarity between these books.
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
Three stories, “The Most Dangerous Game”, “The Sniper”, and “Just Lather, That’s All”, each with their own plots and conflict, yet they are all quite the same. Examples of conflict are, man vs man, man vs self, and man vs nature. Comparing the stories and writing down detailed descriptive notes shows the similarities between all three interesting stories. To compare the stories may take some time but with careful analyzing and good descriptions, the comparing may not be as hard.
works of literature have tremendous amounts of similarity especially in the characters. Each character is usually unique and symbolizes the quality of a person in the real world. But in both stories, each character was alike, they represented honor, loyalty, chivalry, strength and wisdom. Each character is faced with a difficult decision as well as a journey in which they have to determine how to save their own lives. Both these pieces of literatures are exquisite and extremely interesting in their own ways.
“Miss Brill” is written by Katherine Mansfield. The protagonist, Miss Brill, is from an English town, but she now lives in a French town. The story does not say whether or not she has a support system; so, we assume she does not. Krebs is the protagonist in the short story “Soldier’s Home” written by Ernest Hemingway. Krebs is a character in this short story that has come to his home town, Oklahoma, after shielding his country in World War I. Although Krebs and Miss Brill are from two altered environments, they share some of the same isolated qualities and obstinate habits.