The Role Of Individualism In Ayn Rand's Anthem

1003 Words3 Pages

Ayn Rand’s strong opinion of individualism is exaggerated in a most extreme way in her world famous novel Anthem. Her book focuses on “we” rather than “I,” and about the community rather than individuals. She magnifies communism to every possible extreme. Though her book may only be an extended hyperbole, Rand was wrong to go that far into her distorted “future” reality. She should not have gone that far because we could never come to a point where the following things aren’t valued. Communism could never take away the importance of: names and families, learning and individual beliefs, and friendship. We will never have to recite to ourselves, “We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the greater WE, One indivisible forever,” …show more content…

Families are there to build each other up and help prepare each other for the future. “Family is the single most important influence in a child's life”(Smart Beginnings). Family names and individual names show personality and individuality. Treating people like they are just another number makes it easier for them to give up on themselves; and eventually take their own life. In an article published in 2009 Jim Connolly expresses, “These people have feelings. They have good days and bad days. They have ups and downs. They have days where they want to cry with joy and days where they cry with sorrow. These unique, immeasurably valuable individuals are many things to many people, but they are NOT numbers”(Connolly). In Anthem, Ayn Rand exaggerates the use of communism by identifying characters with numbers carelessly chosen by the government. explains, ¨Our name is Equality 7-2521, as it is written on our iron bracelet which all men wear on their left wrists with their names upon it¨(Anthem …show more content…

However, when communism is adopted so is collectivism. In history collectivism hasn’t been very beneficial; The Soviets tried to use it in 1928. “The state’s requisition of crops, livestock, and farmland was paid for by the farmers and by the lower class in general, some ten million of whom starved to death in five years.
” China also tried this approach in 1958 but it only lasted for three years. In those few years, almost 33 million people died from starvation (Communism Sucks). Furthermore, Anthem went too far by never using the word “I.” “We have broken laws...We are alone here...We strive to be like all our brother men”(Anthem 17&19). All about “we” communism

Open Document