The Representation Of Human Nature In Frankenstein And Mystery Road

1324 Words3 Pages

The representation of human nature in literature can reveal an author’s or director’s views on flaws in characters and societies. This is evident in the texts, Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and Mystery Road by Ivan Sen, as they both make interpretations on the deadly sin, Greed. There are many characteristic traits that make up human nature; greed is one such example, representing a flaw in people that drives an intensive, destructive and selfish desire for something. Through Shelley’s characters, Victor Frankenstein and Robert Walton, she portrayed examples of extreme greed through their unabated obsession for knowledge. So much so, that their ambition leads to irresponsible behaviour and ultimately unwanted loneliness. Similarly, Sen conveyed …show more content…

They were ruthless in their pursuit of cash, ruining people’s lives by producing drugs with no visible guilt or regret. The main reason that the police could do this unhindered is that they had the responsibility to enforce the law and due to the isolation weren’t held accountable. They were willing to take any action to maintain their illegal dealings including the murder of a fellow officer, Bobby. His wife Peggy said “Bobby always spoke a certain way... talking to another cop… Like he trusted them,” which shows that most people will fully trust the police. Throughout the film, written codes such “Massacre Creek” and “Slaughter Hill” on signs provide contextual information relating Indigenous and European history to the treatment of indigenous hundreds of years ago. It can be assumed that these names were given to the areas after indigenous were killed for their land out of greed. When the Sargent took Jay for a beer he used the metaphor, “Ah, come on, Jay. Your hands are gonna get a bit grubby from time to time,” suggesting that Jay would need to become crooked if he was to stay in the job. He was advised by Sarge to not get “caught in the middle” as a passive aggressive threat to either join them or face the same fate as Bobby. Sarge had gathered a lot of wealth from his unlawful practices as shown by his personal life as a landowner with horses “worth a buck. or two.” His nature and his many of his fellow officers, to retain and accumulate wealth by any means necessary, show immense greed with no regard for the huge influence he was making on the

Open Document