The Reflection Of Film And Roman Polanski's Macbeth

884 Words2 Pages

With the exception of the Bible, I contend, no other body of work has been more revisited and retold than William Shakespeare’s. In this essay I will analyze two scenes in Macbeth in terms of how the story is retold through the lens of film. Specifically, I will be examining Roman Polanski’s 1971 adaptation of Macbeth. I contend that the Polanski, while maintaining the spirit of Shakespeare, employs visual devices unavailable to Elizabethan era authors. My points of comparison and contrast will focus on Act III, Scene 4 and Act IV, scene 1. When Shakespeare, during the banquet scene in Act III, starts expounding on Macbeth’s descent into madness, much is left, textually, to the imagination. While Shakespeare was linguistic genius, he was also well versed in the art of subtlety. Roman Polanski, while a man of many talents, did not have subtlety in his quiver. That is to say, his representation of Macbeth is unflinchingly gory. In reviewing the stage directions for Macbeth, the ghost of Banquo is left undefined. He is not played by an actor upon the stage, at least not according to the stage directions. We …show more content…

While Shakespeare leaves the mystery of Macduff’s “untimely” birth to the end of the play, Polanski foreshadows the strange manner of Macduff’s birth for the viewer. In the film, Macbeth drinks the potion prepared for him by the witches. This sets off a montage of images, including a particularly bloody depiction of a woman receiving a caesarian section. In depicting a caesarian section, he foreshadows the fact that Macduff, by accident of the manner of his birth, will be Macbeth’s potentially deathly foe. This is a function of the visual medium, which Polanski beautifully exploits here. Polanski is employing foreshadowing in the manner of a literary device without fully revealing the circumstances of Macduff’s birth, which becomes such a crucial plot point in the

Open Document