Consent and confidentiality The questionnaire The questionnaire was designed to be easily understood and was available in both English and Maltese. It took roughly thirty minutes to complete. A pilot questionnaire was completed to be sure that the questions were not difficult to understand and were easy to answer. The names of the parents and their children were not written down and the parents just needed to put the completed questionnaire in the self addressed envelope and post it, thus ensuring anonymity. Participation in the research was voluntary. Apart from the questionnaire the parents received an information letter explaining the purpose of the study and what was expected from them. The parents were asked to sign a consent form. They …show more content…
The clinician explained that where possible, consent to break that confidence would be obtained. When consent is not given, or is refused, the information may still be lawfully shared if there is justification that it is in the interest of the public for it to be shared but still consent should be sought and is the first option when possible. The parents were informed that there may be times when the researcher has to break confidentiality but that, if this happened, they would be informed why this has happened and who the researcher is going to inform. Confidentiality would only be broken if the researcher is informed of, or suspects historical, immediate or possible future harm to the child, parent, another person or clinical malpractice. None of the above reasons were detected by the clinician so there was no need to break …show more content…
If a parent appeared to become distressed during the interview then the researcher would have given them the chance to stop the interview for a few minutes or take time out to compose themselves. Participants were informed at the start of the interview that they could take time out or terminate the interview at any time. None of the participants that finished the interview seemed to be struggling. Had there been a problem the researcher would have referred them back to the appropriate clinical service for
...rt of the medical profession, the therapists are expected to maintain the confidentiality of their clients. A psychologist must be able to acquire a client’s trust in order to keep quality confidentiality amongst the two parties. Only on seriously occasions should the patient’s records be shared, under certain other conditions the psychotherapy records of a minor can be reviewed by others without prior written consent. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), psychologists can usually give way the patient records to parents or legal guardians. Some of the ethical rules that apply to the practice of child and adolescent psychiatry are clear and generally agreed upon For example, rules against sexual contact or harsh or abusive treatment are encoded as boundary violations. A psychotherapist must be able to respect the boundaries of the client.
Confidentiality is a major topic within care environments. When it comes to deciding what information is shared and who it is shared amongst can be difficult. Confidential information, is information that is ‘not to be told to anyone’ (The Open University, 2015, p. 58). Information that is sensitive or not publicly known is confidential, also if information is given by a person who is in a setting where confidentially is expected then that information should remain private and not shared with others. It can be very difficult for a staff member to find the balance between knowing what information is confidential and appropriate information that needs to be shared between the staff team.
First of all, if the physician is talking with a middle-aged man about his state of health before talking with his family, the patient might result in depression, can regret or even feel the need to give up treatment. If the doctor is talking with an elderly patient about his or her condition, it is likely that the older patient will choose not to pursue the treatment because his or her life is lived and there is no purpose to agonize and hurt relatives in the process of treatment. A possible exception is if a doctor’s patient is a child. For a doctor, it is not necessarily important to be completely honest directly with the young patient without talking with family first. This is mainly because the child is not very educated to understand the severity of their condition or the potential outcomes. In addition, the child cannot make decisions independently. It is important for a physician to talk with a child’s parents or guardians prior to discussing the child’s condition with the child itself. This allows the physician be certain that after a diagnosis, the child will be less likely to be psychologically traumatized. ...
... child, but that is not always the case. When it comes to the health of the baby, whose at fault? Is the parents the ones that caused the health problem, or is it the doctors fault for not taking the extra measures to insure the safety of the child. When the health and the safety of the child is involved everyone wants to blame everyone, but who is really at fault? Do doctors have the right to disclose information from their patients? Doctors have a duty to give the information to their patients whether it is good or bad. Doctors should not have the right to withhold information from any of their patients. A doctor should have to tell their patients all the information they know specially when it comes to their unborn child. The health and the information about their child should be told to the parents so they can make the decision that they feel would be best.
Although medicine is a field that is constantly evolving and we have obtained a vast amount of knowledge since Hippocrates’ era, it is telling to see that confidentiality is consistently valued in the care for patients. Beauchamp and Childress highlight the need for consent to divulge patient information. This shows how confidentiality promotes the autonomy of the patient, thus promoting a patient centered model where the patient holds power in the physician-patient relationship. This is a point that is further stressed by Ludwig and Burkie. The GMC includes the importance of confidentiality in maintaining the trust that both patients and the public have for doctors. This is vital for public heath because a general mistrust for doctors can form a culture where individuals refrain from seeking medical advice. This could potentially increase the prevalence of disease and mortality rates. It is seen that various methodologies indirectly support the concept of confidentiality, implying that its ethical basis is principally inarguable. In the UK patient privacy is enforced by the law and the two aforementioned cases demonstrate the severe consequences that can ensue when health professionals breach confidentiality. In both cases there was an elaborate procedure following the breach which evaluated the situation and decided the punishment. It necessary to have such
In response to the question set, I will go into detail of the study, consisting of the background, main hypotheses, as well the aims, procedure and results gathered from the study; explaining the four research methods chosen to investigate, furthering into the three methods actually tested.
Without patient confidentiality, patients would not be willing to tell about themselves or their family member for fear of it getting out (tTelegraph). If they were asked
Respecting a person’s sovereignty is essential when working in the medical field. The “rules” of upholding one’s autonomy is to respect the privacy of others, to not lie, to maintain confidentiality, to obtain consent, and to advise one when needed. Physicians should dismiss a person lacking the capacity to make decisions for themselves however it will defy the “ to obtain consent” and “to respect the privacy of others”
In today’s society with the blogs, the gossip sites and the other forms of social media, confidentiality is a thing of the past. However, for, physicians and other health professionals, they are held to a higher standard to maintain a level of ethics and confidentiality for their patients. Confidentiality is a major duty for a health professional, but is there ever a time to where it is okay to tell what a patient says in confident? What if the patient is a minor, or a senior citizen or someone who is mentally challenged? What if a patient is being abused or wants to commit suicide? Does it matter if it is a nurse, or a dentist, or a psychologist or is all medical professional held to the same moral standard? What roles does a consent form or Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act plays in the medical world in being confidentiality? I would like to explore Confidentiality and the moral effects it has on the health profession.
...esearch is not always an easy choice. There is often a fine balance between respecting the information gained from a child which has been freely given on a confidential basis and ensuring adequate protection for the child. Similarly ensuring that informed consent is given may result in some children not taking part in the research, but it also protects children from covert research which may not show them in a true light. As we have seen ethical issues are not always easy to resolve, but it is important to identify potential ethical problems so that ways of addressing them can be determined. Whether or not a piece of research is required to be approved by an ethics committee or not, by raising ethical questions during the planning stage it helps to ensure protection for both children and researchers and ultimately leads to better, well thought out research.
...d for consent to proceed with the study. The participants were given thorough instructions that at any during the survey you can withdrawal your participation in the research, and that this is to benefit research to society. Participation is this survey was voluntary was emphasized. Participants were told that the surveys should take no longer than fifteen minutes and the personal information will remain confidential their results may be shared, but for research purposes only. The questionnaire will have a demographic sheet and a 50 item questionnaire divided into two sections. One part has a four point Likert scale (0= Almost Never, 1=Sometimes, 2= Often, 3 =Almost Always) and the other part is a selection of A or B. It was also reiterated that the participants had the right to withdraw from the research study at any time; there will be no consequences or penalty.
Confidentiality will always be an important component in medical discussions, but confidentiality on the other hand is not a right and has to be stable against counter claims (Chalmers, 2003). Some arguments and facts that were used in the article were how are health care providers supposed to be able to correct the stability? Should overt content always be required from clients for any use of their health care information separately from the direct clinical care? The proof suggests that where the informed consent is needed completeness of health information hurts and unfinished health ...
Confidentiality in health care is a growing concern as nurses are often faced with the challenges of reacting to question regarding patient’s progress (McGowan, 2012). Confidentiality as defined by Gregory, Raymond-Seniuk, Patrick and Stephen (2015) is the promise given to a person that his or her personal information will not be disclosed randomly if no consent has been given regardless of who is seeking such information (p.600). This paper will attempt to explore the concept of confidentiality as a sensitive issue, challenges that nurses face as they try to protect patient’s health information and some guidelines that govern protection of information and when this information can be divulged.
There are many kinds of situations when you would break confidentiality. These types of situations includes; if there is an evidence or a reasonable cause that the child is suffering or is at risk of suffering significant harm or suspecting any kinds of abuse happening at home. If there are any concerns, you have to contact the department of Community Services and explain to them about your concerns for the child.
When some states require specific disclosure laws or guidelines. To establish in legal matters confidential moral responsibility for professional level of confidentiality. Abortion, the issue is required by state law, many states require parental notification. Doctor-patient confidentiality, from the English common law in many countries codification regulations. Doctors have a responsibility to warn patients who are threaten bodily harm people. Doctor-patient confidentiality is not absolute. Doctors must disclose personal information, it is clearly in the interests of the patient. Doctors can not pass moral judgment; they are here just to make sure your child has the best preventive care possible. Please note that when it comes to