The Pros And Cons Of The Thirty Years War

830 Words2 Pages

There have been many wars fought throughout history, due to different religious beliefs. One of these wars would be, the Thirty Years War, which took place from about 1618-1648. This war happened to be one of the most disastrous ones ever in history, though it was spread all through Europe. It was initially between the Protestants and Catholics, that were involved in the Holy Roman Empire. It started off as a religious conflict, where the Lutherans were being converted back to Catholicism, and the two religions formed alliances in the empire. The violence had first started when Ferdinand II, the Holy Roman Emperor inflicted upon promoting one state religion to all other religious beliefs. The Protestants were furious by that violation of their own rights that was permitted …show more content…

Then had come the Swedish period, where the Habsburgs had granted Protestant tolerance by a letter of majesty. But during the early stages of conflicts with the Swedes, they had won many victories until their own commander fell in the battle of 1632. Their Protestant leader happened to be Gustavus Adolphus, (1611-1632). The battle that was in the time of 1632 was the Battle of Lutzen, there were pros and cons to this battle. The pro was that the Swedes had defeated Wallenstein, but the con was that the commander/king himself was killed. Wallenstein came in contact and made secret discussions with Sweden and France, but then he was assassinated a few days later. Those two deaths of Gustavus and Wallenstein brought an end to the war. But then they had reached the final period of time, which was the French Period. It happened around 1635 to when it ended in 1648. Cardinal Richelieu, who was the ruler of France had a goal. His goal was to block block out the growth of Habsburg power with the chance to interfere with the Protestant side. In the beginning of this phase, in 1635 Richelieu marched the French army into Germany had joined the Swedish

Open Document