The Pros And Cons Of The Hydrogen Bombs

1393 Words3 Pages

The creation of the hydrogen bomb, moreover the summoning of an arms race, spawned worldwide desire for nuclear arms, and worldwide fear for those who had them; The effects of such can be seen in the economic and diplomatic benefits exhibited by those with enough stamina and vigilance to endure its costs, and in the extreme measures taken by countries, nominally the United States, to respond to the security threat posed when other countries owned the bomb. Furthermore: For those whose economy could afford it, nominally the U.S., USSR and India, economic and diplomatic benefits followed its creation; For the U.S., following the creation of the bomb by enemies were extreme defense tactics; For all the benefits and costs compelled a worldwide …show more content…

After the first Hydrogen bomb was tested on November 1st 1952, many nations desired its power and a worldwide arms race for hydrogen bombs began. “August 12 [, 1953]: First test of Soviet thermonuclear device (Andrei Sakharov 's "Layer Cake") takes place.”(9). The USSR is the first to follow in the footsteps of the United States, since it was during the cold war, the USSR was basically forced to build and test a hydrogen bomb to prove their power and technological advancements. For the USSR, building this bomb had many prospects that made it very desirable, one was an increase in nationalism, and a showcase to the world of their power; possibly a fear tactic for easier imperialism, secondly: this gave them an economic boost as well as a boost to production: workers would take pride in what they did and therefore were more motivated to work hard. “NEW DELHI, May 17 [, 1998]— In a disclosure with potential to accelerate further a nuclear arms race with Pakistan, Indian scientists confirmed today that the largest of the five underground nuclear tests they conducted last week involved a hydrogen bomb”(10) India too followed in the arms race, their test came later yet “The news conference in New Delhi turned into another occasion for Indians to demonstrate soaring pride over the nuclear tests. The scientists were applauded by Indian reporters, asked for their autographs and generally treated much …show more content…

As a result, after the testing of the Hydrogen bomb there are immediate, visible, positive fluctuations in economic affairs. As seen in these graphs of GDP, Employment Rate, Inflation Rate, Revenue, and Producer Price changes (to other countries),(appendix 1-6) which are all great tools of measuring the health of an economy, at the time of the first Hydrogen bomb testing in the United States there was a spike in inflation, GDP, employment and revenue. Considering that the spike occurs at the same time as the first Hydrogen bomb test, and that no other spikes are seen on these graphs except on the days of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (another first use of a massive bomb), it can be reasonably inferred that there is a direct correlation between the creation of the Hydrogen bomb, and these economic benefits/increases. Furthermore, “By mid- 1955, the country had pulled out of the previous year 's recession and gross national product was growing at a rate of 7.6 percent. The boom was so great that the budget for 1956 predicted a surplus of $4.1 billion.”(14) The Hydrogen bomb not only stimulated the economy, but it also helped pull the country out of a recession. As another example, it can be seen that soon after the testing of the Tsar bomb in 1961, which was the most powerful bomb in the world to be ever tested, The USSR’s GNP

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Hydrogen Bombs

Open Document