The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

1265 Words3 Pages

The Civil War was a bloody and vicious war that alienated two regions and pitted family members against family members or friends against friends. Despite the popular belief that the war would be quick, it was actually not. Thousands of men were lost in these battles and these soldiers and citizens lives would never be the same again after experiencing Shiloh or Antietam. The Union was led by President Abraham Lincoln and General Ulysses S. Grant while the Confederacy was backed by President Jefferson Davis and General Robert E. Lee. While the Union had a seemingly never ending supply of able-bodied men and supplies, they lacked the tactful generals the Confederacy had. If the Confederates had the amount of supplies the North had combined
The Union already had a stable, potent government and without the South’s opposing views, more laws on business could be passed to boost their economy. The northern states were already self-sufficient. Although, the citizens would have suffered great grief and loss from losing such a bloody war and their most-hated custom still existed, slavery. Nevertheless, I surmise another war would break out between the two countries on the issue of slavery because the Union had a strong opposition towards it that most likely would not be pacified unless the institution was abolished completely. The two needed each other because the South provided raw goods that were used to manufacture finished products the country and other ones could use, which profited for the both of them. As shown through the many brutal battles of the Civil War, both sides were intelligent and tactful in the ways they fought and evaded the other army, so together as one country they would, without a doubt, be an intimidating military. Eventually, the countries would have united once again, even if the Confederates won the

Open Document