Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hillary Clinton's leadership style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hillary Clinton's leadership style
With the elections being a prevalent part of American society for the past year, there has been much debate as to who should be our next president of the United States and how they can steer us into the right direction. Endorsing a leader can be challenging, especially when social media has repeatedly bashed all the possible candidates equally. However, when the time and effort has been put into doing research on exactly what each candidate stands for, and what they can do for our country, the choice is obvious. Hillary Clinton has many good values and has previous experience which indicate she can be the leader that brings positive change to all Americans for the next four to eight years.
To first evaluate Hillary Clinton and how she will
…show more content…
With her future plans to try and move this country forward and create progress, make her capable of being a great leader for the nation. On her campaign website, she states her future plans which include giving tax breaks to working families struggling to make ends meet ("Hillary Clinton's Plan for a Fair Tax System"). Elaborating, she adds that she wants to add a relief to those paying out-of-pocket costs for health care and for those caring for sick or elderly citizens. She also stated that she wants to pay for aspiring investments while remaining financially responsible ("Hillary Clinton's Plan for a Fair Tax System"). Clinton provides illustrations such as advancing well-paying jobs, striving for debt-free college, and other measures to create equality for everyone. Both of those examples are what democrats and myself believe in. Her previous voting and working experience show that she can make these changes and will steer our country to success. Tony Nitti, a Tax Partner in Withum Smith + Brown’s National Tax Service Group, summarized Clinton’s pervious actions well. He documented that she voted against the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, otherwise known as the Bush tax cuts, named after George W. Bush (Nitti). The purpose of the bill was to reduce the tax rates for all the taxpayers. Continuing through his article, he stated that while Hillary was running for president against Barack Obama in 2008, she proposed that taxpayers who earn less than $250,000 get a tax break, and making college and health care more affordable (Nitti). She has the same ideologies over the years, which shows that she will most likely continue to have the same views. It is important that her beliefs are consistent because it shows predictability and stability, which is what this country
It is obvious the Republican Party has no brains. If they elect Donald Trump to run for president, they are going to lose big time. They can blame themselves for being so stupid. The establishment runs the Republican Party. They are the ones who lose major elections. The leadership of the Republican Party shifts the blame to conservative wing of the Republican Party; however, it is the moderate wing of the Republican Party who loses elections. Does John McClain ring a bell? If the Republican Party hopes to win the presidency, they must run a conservative or face another trouncing in the next election. It is that simple. Therefore, the Republicans had better wake up fast if they want to
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a well-recognized woman in the United States. Her great contribution as secretary of State impact people’s lives. One of many remarkable speeches Hillary gave was the “The women rights speech”, in the 4th World Conference on Women Plenary Session where she uses strong words and emotions to appeal the audience. Even though the speech talks about women rights, she wants everyone, including men and children to listen and take action. Her use of ethos, logos and pathos throughout the speech made the audience believe in her words.
Hillary Clinton, never having a legislative record, has been the First Lady to the President for 8 years. Clinton has been a resident of New York State for only a few months previous to the time she began running for office. Clinton is challenged by her opponent because radio and television ads seem to turn the public against Clinton. This is an example of Lazio criticizing her because of his negatively directed ads towards Clinton. Because Clinton has never been involved in a legislature before, she has no voting record. This could prove to be a disadvantage for Clinton because voters cannot see what she has previously supported. Hillary has an advantage in the election because the New York Times endorsed her. Being the most prominent newspaper in New York, this is a sign of success as the last two politicians endorsed by the NYT have won their elections. Another disadvantage that Clinton has is that she is not a born New York citizen. She has been “carpetbagging”, or buying property in a state just so she can run for office in the state. Hillary takes a firm stand on many of the issues facing New York State and the Congress today. Hillary Clinton’s views on abortion are that she supports the Roe vs. Wade ruling. This act was passed in 1973 when the US Supreme Court legalized abortion. She would vote to ban late-term abortion, unless the mother or child was threatened by the birth. Clinton would reject Supreme Court jurors who are opposed to abortion rights. Hillary also agrees with federal funds spent on abortions at military hospitals. Hillary acknowledges the competition between her and Lazio by retaliating to a comment he made by saying, “My opponent [Lazio] is wrong. I have said many times that I can support a ban on late term abortion including partial-birth abortions, so long as the health and life of the mother is protected”.
Clinton repeats the words “If women” followed by “will” (Clinton), this gives the audience a reason to accept her propositions. Good outcomes come with good actions. When she concluded her speech, Hillary kept using the repetition of the words dignity, respect, family and children. Clinton’s credibility is not questioned when she says she has been working in the case, “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families” (Clinton) this is the way she knows about women and their necessities, “I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton).Her goal is definite, “To strengthen families and societies by empowering women to take greater control over their own destinies”( Clinton). This change will not only affect women, but everyone who surrounds them.
Donald Trump is a highly successful business titan, real estate mogul, reality television personality, and now a 2016 presidential candidate. Since announcing his candidacy this past June, he has been very loquacious on his views pertaining to foreign policy. He takes a very realist approach when addressing these issues. His views are very much in line with the belief that the international political arena is not dominated by altruistic ideologies, but rather nation-states that are self-interested. His foreign policy platform centers on using hard power to achieve America’s goals in the Middle East and to eradicate illegal immigration.
Still, as one Republican official described her, Clinton is often viewed as “‘grating, abrasive and boastful’” (236). Generally, female candidates are expected to be “more caring, compassionate, and emotional than their male counterparts, who tend to be seen as tough, assertive, and decisive” (Bauer). This issue is common among female candidates, and this expectation has certainly impacted Clinton’s campaign. Despite her background as Secretary of State, Clinton is continually questioned by her opponents about her strength.
The 2016 presidential election has been one of the most talked about elections because of one man, Donald Trump. When the billionaire real estate mogul announced that he would be running for the Republican Party candidacy in the 2016 presidential election, he sent this country into an uproar. Donald Trump, who has never shied away from the media, has become one of the most talked about presidential candidate in history. On the day of his announcement for the republican candidacy, he sparked controversy because of his comment about the Mexican people, stating:
Information in today’s world is available to almost everyone, every second of the day. The news seems to cover every topic a person can imagine, and occasionally something that no one would have thought to imagine. Speeches by politicians’ stream across our televisions and computer screens it seems almost nonstop. However, one particular topic seems hard to find and very rarely every talked about, the positions the republican party stands for. Democrats seem to be very vocal about their positions. Republicans aren’t as vocal and when given the opportunity to talk about their positions they often are more concerned about defending themselves against rivals. The truth of the matter is, if you take the time to do some research and listen to a republican talk when they aren’t on the defensive, you can learn a lot about their policies and where they stand on the issues.
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
During her early life, Hillary Clinton learned that a huge problem across the globe was gender inequality. Women and men were not equal. Men were making more money than women for the same jobs. She believed she could change this. On September 5, 1995 Hillary Clinton gave a speech at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Clinton uses powerful rhetoric in order to create an air of sympathy for women among her audience. She is hoping to make the world become more aware of the inequalities women face daily while also making them feel ashamed for their previous actions of discriminating women, which would cause them to change their ways. She uses her speech “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights” to create awareness of the discrimination
Hillary Clinton, the nominated candidate of the democratic party, who is running for
Examples of her claims of cause is stating that if women are treated equally then the result of that is “their families will flourish” (Clinton, par. 7) and this shows that because women are limited because of their gender, their family is suffering the consequences. Clinton’s claims of facts are “Women comprise more than half the world’s population, 70% of the world’s poor, and two-thirds of those who are not taught to read and write” (Clinton, par. 10) and “Women are also dying from diseases that should have been prevented or treated” (Clinton, par.10). These are stated to show that because women are mistreated, these statistics are happening all around the world. Her claims of value such as “We need to understand there is no one formula for how women should lead our lives” (Clinton, par. 15) show that cultures that think little of women are limiting them in all their abilities and capabilities. Clinton’s examples of policy claims are as follows “It is time for us to say here in Beijing, and the world to hear, that it is no longer acceptable to discuss women’s rights as separate from human rights” (Clinton, par. 17) and “Women must enjoy the rights to participate fully in the social and political lives of their countries, if we want freedom and democracy to thrive and endure” (Clinton, par. 27). These are stated to show that injustice is happening
Many Americans are beginning to wonder who will run as the Democratic candidate for the next president of the United States. Since the 2008 election, one particular name has been the topic of conversation around most media outlets and households across the county. With over one million supporters who believe in her abilities to lead, Hillary Clinton possesses the qualities that meet the leadership criteria that would help her to become the leader of the free world. I choose to research Hillary Clinton because I admire the drive and passion she puts into her work. She is a unique global leader whose activism has promoted social change around the world.
As both "conservatism" and "liberalism" have had various meanings sooner or later and transversely countries, the word liberal conservatism has been used in relatively different sanity. In political science, the word is used to pass on to ideologies that merge the support of capitalism, for instance value for contracts, protection of private property and free market require reference to validate with the principle in natural discrimination, the significance of religion, and the worth of traditional integrity need reference to validate in the course of a construction of inadequate, legitimate, representative government (Abdou & Zaazou 2013). It contrasts with traditional liberalism and particularly aristocratic conservatism, rejecting the belief of correspondence as a little in discordance with human nature, instead emphasizing the thought of natural inequality (Crozier. 2012).As the conservative thought in democratic countries hold typical liberal institutions such as the rule of law, private property, market economy, and constitutional representative government, the liberal factor of liberal conservatism
The nation is split between these two and many people are describing it as a ‘pick your poison’ which is not a very comforting phrase while choosing the next leader of the nation. Looking at different polls and trends, I had a very difficult time predicting the outcome. In the end, I predict and hope that the next president of our nation to be Hillary. With her background involved in politics and government she would not need such a long period to adjust into a power holding position. Her values and her positions on foreign affairs would also benefit America more than the values carried by