Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of halfway houses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of halfway houses
Pros of Halfway houses Supervised It is made known to the residence in the community Offenders and addicts are in intervention programs to help build a sober life It allows the offenders to transition in the community No ties to the community for a peaceful living If ran supervised and ran the right way, no one would even notice it Offenders are often drug tested Cons of Halfway houses Lowered property values Not guaranteed that the house would be properly supervised Some residents may not feel safe in their own neighborhood Occupied by drug addicts and/or convicts If not managed properly it could lead to the escape of offenders If offenders are not attending or following the programs it could lead to unwanted activities Being an individual
Managing case assignments allows for the offender to have the best opportunities for reintegration into the community as well as for the criminal justice system to successfully supervise the offender. There exist 4 different case assignment models that are used most frequently to provide the offender with his or her most basic needs and services.
Correctional program writing nowadays is at a level of efficiency that surpasses earlier outlooks. In territories all over the United States, there are several curriculums that use research-based curriculums to teach, instruct, and inspire inmates. Disappeared are the days of hit-or-miss execution of curriculums that seemed good, but over and over again just occupied time for the inmates. The previous evolution happened for several reasons (Corrections Today, 2010). The largest wake-up demands was the claim composed around thirty years ago. The statement made was not anything works in corrections systems, mainly rehabilitation. Even though this commonly revealed report was taken from its context, it did in detail carry some notice to the mystery that several penitentiaries were not operational as change
There are elements that should be considered in having a winning business proposal. These elements include Solutions, Benefits, Credibility & Samples and Targeted. Solution includes stating the needs and problems that could or would occur then one would give solutions that one could be implemented. Benefits would include an outlined plan as to what benefits to be gained in doing business with this particular halfway house. Credibility and Sample is having a familiarity with clients in the area or having had a previous experience that can give a third-party endorsement that will give one the credibility.
This approach has been instituted in California and the PI believes it should serve as a model for the entire country’s juvenile justice systems to help teens discover the alternatives to crime and to prevent offending or re-offending in youth.
In the New York Times article, “Safety and Justice Complement Each Other,” by Glenn E. Martin, the author informs, “The Vera Institute for Justice found a 36 percent recidivism rate for individuals who had completed alternative drug programs in New York City, compared with 54 sentenced to prison, jail, probation or time served.” Alternative programs are more likely to inhibit future criminal acts, while incarceration seems to lack long-lasting effects on individuals. In continuance, the author adds that 3 percent of treatment participants were rearrested for violent crimes, while 6 percent of untreated criminals were rearrested for violent crimes. Diversion programs are able to treat one’s motivation for their criminal acts, rather than assuming that illegal habits will go away with time. Instead of sending nonviolent offenders to jail, legislators should consider introducing practical
and local criminal justice systems to manage. These offenders are considered unresponsive to incarceration as a ...
... or minor vehicle offenses. This programs proved to be very effective in other countries like England due to the fact that they utilize this program more as an alternative to prison rather than just a condition. For that, it is hard to say whether it is effective in the United States in its current state. It might just be a problem of implementation.
Lipsey, M. W., Chapman, G. L., L & Enberger, N. A. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. The annals of the american academy of political and social science, 578 (1), pp. 144--157.
The definition of motivation according to Kennedy (2000), “[t]he internationalist view asserts that internal and external factors influence the change process From this perspective, motivation is seen as an interpersonal process that can be influenced in a positive way by the professional (para.18). A high-risk youth is defined as a male or female between the ages of 12-17 years old who has had some contact with the law or is at risk of becoming an offender. There is a lack of motivation in some high-risk youth to positively change their lives around. According to Stinson (2009), risk factors associated with juvenile delinquency include “poor academic performance, early childhood aggression, and hyperactivity; lack of parental involvement/interaction and inadequate parental supervision and monitoring; and community/environmental factors, including access to drugs and weapons, and lack of access to community resources due to poverty” (p. 11). At risk youth that engage in community based programs in Ridge Meadows, B.C. such as KidStart, Connex, Yardworks, Community Work Service, sports and leisure and counseling, are more successful later on in their young adulthood versus high risk youth who do not attend such programs. The KidStart program is a mentoring and one-on-one program that works with youth who are at-risk and experiencing difficulties in their lives. According to PLEA (2010), “[t]he primary objective of the program is to strengthen the young person's resilience to the risk factors that are known to lead to victimization, violence and criminal activities” (para. 1). Yardworks is a program that provides youth with work experience and life skills to allow them to enter the workforce and work alongside with a PLEA staff membe...
In recent discussions of prison reform, a controversial issue has been whether diversion programs are more beneficial than not. On the one hand, some argue that diversion programs give convicted criminals a chance to hopefully better themselves and get back into society. On the other hand, however, others argue that these programs are allowing dangerous criminals back into the streets with no guarantee of them changing their behaviors. In sum, then, the issue is whether society and the government should allow these unguaranteed hopes to continue. While some believe that diversion programs may be a good substitute for prison, diversion programs are not an efficient substitute because they release potentially dangerous criminals and felons out onto the streets.
There are three primary principles of effective intervention. First, interventions should target the criminogenic risk factors of the offender (Cullen & Jonson, 2017). Logically, if an intervention is to impact recidivism it needs to address the factors that contributed to the criminality. For example, if an offender is someone who has antisocial associates. Then, one goal would be for them to associate with more prosocial, law-abiding people who can help them stay on track with. Therefore, the intervention targets dynamic rather than static, unchangeable factors (Cullen & Jonson, 2017).
Using the MST significantly reduces recidivism in juvenile offenders. When recidivism does occur it is much less severe. In one study, juvenile offenders enrolled in MST had a recidivism rate of 22.1% in comparison to an individual therapy group which had a recidivism rate of 71.4%. This study also noted that even when a juvenile offender was only involved in MST temporarily their recidivism rate still dropped to 46.6% in comparison to the control group (Bourdin et al. 1995). MST programs ' net cost was $4,743 for each juvenile offender. However, MST is so effective that for each juvenile offender enrolled in MST, the public saves $131,918 (Osher et al. 2003).(May, Osmond, and Billick 2014)
... offenders who were “worse off.” As a result, local criminal justice officials are encouraged to evaluate their current correctional situation in terms of organizational impetus (are key stakeholders behind the initiative?), political culture (will new programs be supported?), and prospective clientele (what type of offenders are being targeted?) to identify the most appropriate program or approach. A common approach being employed by law enforcement agencies around the country to address these questions and identify problems is the utilization of the SARA model. SARA involves:
The caseloads for those considered on low probation are very high. These individuals don’t require high supervision, because they are offenders who have a job and the nature of their crime was non -violent. However, those who are on high supervision are often repeat offenders of violent crimes or have multiple DUIs. They are required to finish their sentence on house arrest and wear an ankle monitor that tracks their every move or a SCRAM device that monitors their alcohol intake. If an offender breaks their probation the PO can send them back to county jail for the remainder of their sentence. Nevertheless, the goal is to try and reduce recidivism by addressing the needs of these individuals by providing them with resources and aid to change their
There is still ongoing research about the most effective program to reduce recidivisms and prevent delinquent behaviors. Prevention program helps children and family in many ways, including bullying, helping young mothers, life skill training programs, and school based programs like STATUS and STEP. Community based intervention helps those that are in probation or out of the juvenile justice system. community intervention programs provide family therapy and work with the family or caretaker of the offender. Also, Intensive Protective Supervision (IPS) is a program where juveniles that caused non-serious offense are supervised by a case manager. Even though these programs have shown to be effective and are available for everyone. The population that needs these kinds of services, most are the minority and those that are